Joyce Thomas, a 78-year-old British widow residing in Sweden for 21 years, is currently facing deportation following the rejection of her post-Brexit residency application. This case is part of a broader trend involving 2,500 British nationals ordered to leave Sweden since Brexit, a figure that represents one-third of all such removal orders issued across the European Union.
The Legal Battle Over Residency Status
The dispute centers on the interpretation of “reasonable grounds” for late applications under the UK-EU withdrawal agreement. Joyce Thomas, a retired nurse living in Hammarö, was notified in November 2023 that she must leave the country within four weeks. Her initial application was rejected in 2024 because authorities determined she failed to provide sufficient justification for the delay. A subsequent appeal under national immigration law was also unsuccessful.
Thomas stated that her late husband, Gwynne, had managed the family’s administrative tasks before his death from cancer in 2023. She noted that they only became aware of the formal residency requirement during a trip to the UK in 2022. Thomas is currently pursuing a challenge in a higher court with the assistance of pro bono legal counsel, describing her situation as an “unbearable limbo.”
Sweden’s Enforcement Strategy Compared to EU Peers
According to the most recent annual report on the implementation of the withdrawal agreement, Sweden refused nearly 4,000 out of 14,200 applications. This results in a 27.5% refusal rate, which is more than seven times the EU average of 3% to 4%.
A comparison of enforcement statistics highlights the disparity in national policies. For example, Bulgaria, which processed a similar volume of approximately 16,000 applications, issued only five refusals. Belgium, with 13,000 applicants, recorded 605 refusals. UK government sources have characterized the Swedish approach as “considerably stricter” than that of other nations, noting that “reasonable grounds” for late filings are rarely accepted in practice by Swedish officials.
Official Responses and Humanitarian Concerns
The UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) has formally raised concerns with both the Swedish government and the European Commission regarding the treatment of British citizens. Former business secretary and MP for Brighton, Peter Kyle, described the situation as “deeply concerning.” Kyle has urged Swedish authorities to review the case, citing the humanitarian factors involved, including Thomas’s long-term residency and her close ties to family members living in Sweden.
The Swedish immigration authority, Migrationsverket, maintains that late applications are only considered under “exceptional circumstances.” A spokesperson for the agency stated that “simply stating that the person was unaware of the requirement to apply is not, in itself, considered a sufficient explanation.” This hardline stance follows previous controversies, including the 2022 case of a British woman with dementia who was threatened with deportation while in a care home shortly before her death.
Did you know?
According to Eurostat data, Sweden has issued the highest number of Brexit-related deportation orders for British nationals of any EU member state, accounting for roughly 33% of all such orders across the entire 27-member bloc.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was Joyce Thomas’s residency application rejected?
The Swedish immigration authority rejected her application because it was filed after the post-Brexit deadline and she did not provide what the authorities deemed “reasonable grounds” for the delay.
What is the “reasonable grounds” clause?
Article 18 of the EU-UK withdrawal agreement allows for late residency applications if the applicant can demonstrate specific, reasonable grounds for why they could not apply on time.
How does Sweden’s refusal rate compare to other EU countries?
Sweden’s refusal rate for post-Brexit residency applications stands at 27.5%, significantly higher than the EU average of 3% to 4%.
What is the current status of the case?
Joyce Thomas is currently working with pro bono lawyers to appeal the decision in a higher court.
If you have information regarding similar residency challenges or would like to follow updates on this case, please subscribe to our newsletter for the latest developments.
Related reading