Government Restructuring Faces Legal Challenges: ANCOM Case Highlights Concerns Over Independence
A recent legal battle surrounding the restructuring of Romania’s National Authority for Administration and Regulation in Communications (ANCOM) has raised critical questions about government overreach and the independence of regulatory bodies. The Curtea de Apel București (Bucharest Court of Appeal) initially suspended the reorganization plan, citing concerns that the rapid implementation and resulting layoffs – approximately 80 employees – threatened the institution’s functional independence. Although ANCOM contested this decision, the case has now been escalated to the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (High Court of Cassation and Justice) for a final ruling.
Rapid Reorganization Sparks Legal Pushback
The core of the dispute lies in the speed and manner of the restructuring, initiated by the Bolojan Government late last year for ANCOM, the Financial Supervisory Authority (ASF), and the National Energy Regulatory Authority (ANRE). Employees, anticipating lengthy legal proceedings, sought a provisional suspension of the measures – specifically, salary cuts and job reductions – while the courts reviewed the legality of the broader reorganization.
The Court of Appeal sided with ANCOM employees on December 30th, suspending the decisions signed by ANCOM President Valeriu Zgonea on December 16th. A total of 326 ANCOM employees initiated the legal challenge, even though 250 were not directly impacted by the initial reforms. The employees were represented by the law firm of AUR Member of the European Parliament, Gheorghe Piperea.
Arguments Center on Constitutional and EU Law
Piperea’s legal team argued that the government’s actions aimed to subordinate ANCOM, violating both the Romanian Constitution and relevant European directives guaranteeing the authority’s independence. They claimed the restructuring was driven by a political pressure to reduce the budget deficit, potentially at the expense of ordinary citizens. The lawyers asserted that both European regulations and Romanian law prohibit the executive branch from controlling ANCOM.
ANCOM’s legal counsel countered that Law 145/2025, which enabled the reorganization, had been deemed constitutional, making its implementation mandatory.
Court Cites “Temeinous Indications of Illegality”
The Court of Appeal’s decision to suspend the ANCOM reorganization stemmed from concerns about the lack of transparency and clear criteria in the restructuring process. The court found “temeinous indications regarding the illegality of the reorganization decisions.” Specifically, the court highlighted that the rapid implementation, without a thorough analysis of the impact on staffing levels, jeopardized the institution’s ability to function independently.
The court’s motivation detailed that the restructuring, including the division of departments and the resulting layoffs, lacked a “real analysis” of the necessary staff reductions and negatively impacted the workload of remaining employees. This, the court argued, undermined ANCOM’s functional independence.
Subjective Criteria and Potential for Harm
The court as well criticized the criteria used for reducing staff, describing them as “evidently subjective and unclear regarding the order of application of the stages.” It concluded that the reorganization decisions violated principles of legality, transparency, and non-discrimination, creating uncertainty and instability within the institution. The court emphasized that the lack of clear standards created a risk of “serious and imminent individual harm.”
ANCOM had planned to eliminate 84 positions by January 1, 2026, as mandated by Law 145/2025. This included 89 currently occupied positions, with 50 being specialist roles and 110 support roles. Laura Zgonea, the wife of ANCOM President Valeriu Zgonea, resigned following the announcement of the restructuring measures.
Salary Levels at Regulatory Authorities
ANRE, ASF, and ANCOM are known for offering some of the highest salaries in the Romanian public sector. These authorities are self-funded through various taxes and fees levied on the sectors they regulate, ultimately impacting consumer costs for services like RCA insurance, electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications.
Recent data shows average net salaries of 18,635 lei at ANRE, 13,562 lei at ASF, and 12,934 lei at ANCOM.
ASF and ANRE Reorganizations Upheld
Notably, the Curtea de Apel București rejected similar appeals from employees of ASF and ANRE seeking to suspend the reorganization and salary reduction decisions in those agencies. These decisions are not final and have not yet been formally justified by the court.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is ANCOM?
A: ANCOM is the National Authority for Administration and Regulation in Communications, responsible for regulating the Romanian communications market.
Q: What is the main concern regarding the reorganization?
A: The primary concern is that the rapid restructuring and layoffs could compromise ANCOM’s independence and ability to effectively regulate the communications sector.
Q: What is the current status of the legal case?
A: The case has been escalated to the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (High Court of Cassation and Justice) for a final decision.
Q: What were the average salaries at these agencies?
A: Average net salaries were 18,635 lei at ANRE, 13,562 lei at ASF, and 12,934 lei at ANCOM.
Pro Tip: Understanding the role of independent regulatory bodies is crucial for a functioning market economy. Their ability to operate without political interference is essential for fair competition and consumer protection.
Stay informed about the evolving legal landscape and its impact on Romania’s regulatory environment. Explore our other articles on economic policy and regulatory affairs for further insights.
Related reading