Legal Petitions Signal Growing Distance Between Brad Pitt and His Children
Zahara Jolie-Pitt and Maddox Jolie-Pitt have filed formal petitions in Los Angeles to legally remove “Pitt” from their surnames, according to court documents obtained by the Daily Mail. These filings, published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal throughout June and July, represent a phase in a pattern of estrangement between the actor and several of his children. Court hearings for the name changes are scheduled for September.
The Legal Process of Surname Renunciation
In California, individuals seeking a legal name change must adhere to procedural requirements, including the publication of a “Order to Show Cause” in a newspaper for four consecutive weeks before a court date. Maddox filed his petition in late May, while Zahara’s request followed shortly after.
This legal shift follows similar actions by other family members. Shiloh Jolie-Pitt legally dropped “Pitt” from her name upon reaching her 18th birthday last year. According to a statement provided to People by her attorney, the decision followed “painful events” and was an “independent and significant” choice. Similarly, Vivienne Jolie has been credited as “Vivienne Jolie” in the playbill for the Broadway musical The Outsiders since May 2024, despite not having completed a formal legal name change at that time.
Sources of Family Friction and Public Allegations
The public distance between Pitt and his children intensified following a 2016 private flight involving the family. Angelina Jolie subsequently filed for divorce, alleging that Pitt “choked” one child and “struck” another during a confrontation, leaving the family feeling like “hostages.” Pitt’s representative initially denied these claims to CNN as “completely untrue.” In subsequent statements, the actor’s team maintained that while Pitt has taken responsibility for his actions, he denies the allegations of abuse, noting that various public authorities investigated the matter over the past several years.
The divide has extended to the actor’s extended family. Sources reported to the Daily Mail that Pitt’s mother, Jane Eta Pitt, remained estranged from the children for approximately nine years prior to her death. Meanwhile, public comments from the children have been stark. Reports indicate that Pax Jolie-Pitt previously referred to his father as a “world-class asshole” in a social media post, accusing him of causing his younger siblings to “tremble in fear.”
Conflicting Perspectives on Parental Engagement
While the trend toward name changes suggests a separation, the narrative surrounding Pitt’s involvement remains polarized.
* The Perspective of Estrangement: Sources close to Jolie have stated that Pitt has failed to maintain consistent visitation, including missing Zahara’s college graduation ceremony. These sources argue that the current state of the relationships is a direct consequence of Pitt’s past behavior.
* The Defense of the Actor: Conversely, multiple sources speaking to the Daily Mail have defended Pitt, asserting he is not an absent father and maintains a desire to reconnect with all six of his children. According to these accounts, Pitt remains hopeful that time will eventually heal the fractures within the family.
Did you know?
California law requires a four-week newspaper publication period for name change petitions to ensure public notice is provided before a judge grants the final decree.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are all of Brad Pitt’s children changing their names?
While Zahara, Maddox, Shiloh, and Vivienne have either filed for legal changes or ceased using the surname publicly, it is currently unconfirmed if Pax has taken similar steps.
What is the legal status of the divorce between Pitt and Jolie?
Following their 2016 separation, the couple has been involved in litigation regarding both child custody and the ownership of their shared winery.
Has Brad Pitt commented on the name changes?
Pitt has not issued a personal statement regarding the specific name changes. However, his legal representatives have consistently maintained that the actor continues to address family matters through the appropriate court channels.
***
Are you interested in the latest developments in entertainment law and high-profile family proceedings? Subscribe to our newsletter for verified updates and in-depth reporting.
Keep reading