The District Court in Kraków has ordered Cardinal Stanisław Dziwisz to provide proof of his scheduled travel after he failed to appear as a witness in a civil lawsuit brought by Janusz Szymik. Szymik, a former altar boy from Międzybrodzie Bialskie, is seeking 20 mln PLN in compensation from the Archdiocese of Kraków for alleged systemic abuse by priest Jan Wodniak between 1984 and 1989. While legal representatives for the archdiocese have cited the cardinal’s poor health as the reason for his absence, the presiding judge has questioned this justification, noting that the cardinal plans to spend July traveling abroad.
Dispute Over Witness Testimony and Health Claims
Cardinal Dziwisz was summoned to testify regarding his knowledge of the case, as he was previously informed of the allegations against Father Wodniak in 2012. However, the retired hierarch has not appeared for scheduled hearings. In a letter to the court, the cardinal stated he has no knowledge of the case, as he resided in Rome from 1978 to 2004. He further requested to be excused from future hearings, citing his age, health, and medical advice that he should avoid stressful activities.
The court has demanded that the cardinal submit formal documentation, including hotel and flight reservations, to verify his stated travel plans for July. The judge warned that failure to substantiate his absence or provide a court-certified medical excuse will result in a financial penalty. A new hearing date has been set for August 3.
Did You Know?
The current lawsuit follows a previous legal action initiated in 2021 against the Bielsko-Żywiecka Diocese, which resulted in a settlement for Janusz Szymik.
Judicial Warnings and Potential Consequences
The presiding judge has publicly expressed dissatisfaction with the cardinal’s repeated absences, labeling the approach as a lack of serious regard for the court. During previous proceedings, the judge emphasized that the court maintains the authority to order a compulsory appearance by the police if the witness continues to ignore summons. The judge noted a clear contradiction between the cardinal’s claim that his health prevents him from attending court and his plans for a month-long trip to the Vatican.
Background of the Allegations
Janusz Szymik alleges he was molested by Father Jan Wodniak several hundred times during the 1980s. Despite reporting the abuse to the then-bishop of Bielsko-Żywiecka, Tadeusz Rakoczy, no intervention occurred. It was not until 2014 that Bishop Roman Pindel removed Father Wodniak from his position.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Cardinal Dziwisz being called as a witness?
The court considers him a significant witness because he was notified of the abuse allegations involving Father Wodniak in 2012, yet the priest remained in his position until 2014.
What is the cardinal’s current stance on his testimony?
Cardinal Dziwisz has requested to be excused from testifying, stating that he lacks knowledge of the case due to his long-term residence in Rome and that his health prevents him from participating in stressful activities.
What happens if the cardinal does not appear on August 3?
The court has warned that the cardinal faces financial penalties for failing to substantiate his absence. Additionally, the judge has indicated that the court retains the power to order a compulsory appearance by police.
How does the court’s demand for travel documentation change the trajectory of this high-profile civil case?