Dua Lipa Supports Albanian Protests Against Ivanka Trump Luxury Resort Plan

Dua Lipa’s Intervention and the “Flamingo Revolution”

The protest movement, which demonstrators have dubbed the “Flamingo Revolution,” has gained international momentum following remarks from British singer Dua Lipa. During a recent episode of her Service95 Book Club podcast, Lipa—whose parents are Kosovan Albanians—described the ongoing demonstrations as inspiring and criticized the Albanian government for fast-tracking legislation to allow the development.

Her intervention was welcomed by local activists, including Besjana Gurri, who noted that Lipa’s voice helps amplify the concerns of citizens protesting in the capital, Tirana. Aleksandër Trajçe, executive director of the Protection and Preservation of the Natural Environment in Albania (PPNEA), told The Guardian that the timing of the singer’s comments was fantastic and resonated deeply with younger Albanians who view her as an idol.

Project Scope and Environmental Stakes

The proposed development, spearheaded by Jared Kushner’s investment firm, Affinity Partners, involves two primary sites: the uninhabited Sazan Island and a strip of white, sandy shore on the Zvërnec peninsula. As reported by NPR, Ivanka Trump described the project as a personal endeavor, noting that she and her husband were working on a real estate project on a massive scale after she found the island when she was on a friend’s boat and swam out to it. However, local residents and environmentalists dispute the feasibility of that narrative, citing the island’s rugged, mine-littered terrain.

The Zvërnec peninsula is a protected ecological zone within the Vjosa-Narta Delta, a critical habitat for endangered species, including monk seals, loggerhead sea turtles, and migratory birds such as flamingos and the Dalmatian pelican. Conservationists argue that construction—which includes plans for up to 10,000 villas—threatens to destroy these ecosystems. Protesters have reported that bulldozers and barbed-wire fencing appeared at the site earlier this year, often before required environmental impact assessments were completed.

Political Fallout and Government Response

The protests have evolved beyond environmental advocacy into a broader rejection of Prime Minister Edi Rama’s government. Critics allege the administration is prioritizing foreign capital over the needs of its own citizens. In December 2024, the Albanian Parliament amended legislation to permit construction in environmentally sensitive areas, a move that critics say paved the way for the Kushner-linked project. While there is no evidence that Kushner influenced this specific legislative change, opposition leader Sali Berisha has alleged that Rama may have been seeking to buy political influence from Donald Trump by approving the development plans.

Prime Minister Rama has defended the project as a blessing for the Albanian economy and a step toward the country’s goal of joining the European Union by 2030. Despite the mounting pressure, Rama has remained defiant, telling critics that the investment will not stop under his watch. European officials have also entered the fray; Dutch MEP Tineke Strik, who led a fact-finding mission to the country, warned that Albania’s EU accession talks could be jeopardized if the government fails to uphold environmental standards, as noted by The Independent.

Regional Context and Economic Discontent

The unrest in Albania mirrors a wider wave of environmental and anti-corruption protests across the Balkans. In a commentary for Jacobin, observers highlighted that both Albania and Serbia are experiencing a growing disconnect between state structures and citizens, driven by foreign-led development projects. The economic reality in Albania remains strained; official UN estimates suggest that over 43 percent of the population has left the country since the 1991 transition to capitalism, leading to significant “brain drain.”

The protests show little sign of dissipating. While developers associated with the project have stated that they remain committed to responsible stewardship and job creation, the opposition continues to demand the removal of heavy machinery and the restoration of the protected sites.

Find more reporting in our World section.