A coalition of nine European Union nations, including the Czech Republic and Sweden, is lobbying for a reduction in the protected status of the great cormorant to allow for population culls. Proponents argue the birds’ fish consumption—estimated at 180kg per adult annually—outstrips sustainable levels for commercial fisheries, while conservationists like BirdLife International maintain that native predators are vital to ecosystems and should not be managed as nuisances.
Why are EU nations calling for a cormorant cull?
Member states argue that the great cormorant population has expanded beyond economically sustainable levels since receiving protected status in 1979. According to a note submitted by nine EU nations to the Council of the European Union, the species currently numbers up to two million individuals across the continent. Finnish Agriculture Minister Sari Essayah noted that the birds are causing significant problems specifically within the Baltic Sea, where they compete directly with human fishing operations.
In the early 1960s, the great cormorant was nearing local extinction, with only a few thousand breeding pairs remaining in key ranges like Germany, Denmark, and the Netherlands.
How does the proposed cull compare to previous wildlife policy shifts?
The push to manage cormorant numbers follows a successful precedent set by the European Union regarding the wolf. Last year, the EU moved to lower the protection status of the wolf, a policy shift that serves as a strategic blueprint for proponents of the cormorant cull. While both cases involve human-wildlife conflict, the scale of the cormorant population—which rebounded from near-extinction to two million—presents a different set of challenges for fisheries compared to the relatively lower population density of apex predators like wolves.
What are the arguments against changing the bird’s status?
Conservation groups, led by organizations like BirdLife International, argue that altering the bird’s legal status would be an ineffective measure for restoring fish stocks. Marion Bessol of BirdLife International stated that nature does not belong exclusively to humans and that native predators possess an inherent right to their food sources. Critics of the cull point out that previous efforts to control the species—which involved the use of military forces and fire brigades to destroy colonies—were drastic measures that failed to account for the bird’s ecological role.
When tracking environmental policy, monitor the European Parliament’s official reports on biodiversity, as these documents often contain the specific population data used to justify or oppose legislative changes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current protection status of the great cormorant?
The great cormorant is currently a protected species in the European Union, a status it has held since 1979, which has allowed its population to grow to an estimated two million birds.
How much fish does a single cormorant eat?
According to data submitted by the Czech Republic and eight other EU nations, an adult great cormorant consumes approximately 180kg of fish annually.
Will a cull definitely happen?
Not necessarily. Proponents must secure a majority vote from EU member states to successfully change the bird’s protection status, a process that faces stiff opposition from environmental advocates.
What is your take on the balance between wildlife conservation and commercial fishing interests? Share your thoughts in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on European environmental policy.
