Could the FCC yank ABC’s TV licenses amid Trump spat with Kimmel?

by Rachel Morgan News Editor

The Federal Communications Commission has ordered an expedited review of the broadcast licenses for Disney’s ABC television stations. This action is part of an ongoing investigation into the company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices.

ABC currently owns eight TV stations, including KABC-TV in Los Angeles and WABC-TV in New York. The move has drawn immediate scrutiny due to its timing, occurring one day after President Trump called for the firing of late-night host Jimmy Kimmel.

The call for Kimmel’s removal followed a joke on his ABC show that angered President Trump and Melania Trump. Some analysts suggest the FCC’s action is a method to pressure Disney and ABC to change their programming or terminate Kimmel.

Allegations of Discrimination

The FCC’s probe, which began in March 2025, focuses on whether Disney’s DEI policies violate federal anti-discrimination rules. The agency has accused ABC of using race-based hiring practices and limiting corporate fellowships to specific demographic groups.

From Instagram — related to Chairman Brendan Carr, Robert Iger

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr previously claimed in a letter to then-CEO Robert Iger that mandatory “inclusion standards” may have resulted in racial and identity quotas. Carr has alleged that these practices created “racially segregated spaces inside the company.”

This investigation is part of a wider effort by the Trump administration to roll back DEI initiatives across federal agencies, universities, and other employers.

Did You Know? In 1975, the FCC denied the renewal of five radio station licenses after finding that the parent company’s owner had instructed the stations to provide favorable coverage of two Senate candidates.

Legal Challenges and Industry Reaction

The National Association of Broadcasters has called the request “nearly unprecedented,” stating that requiring a single company to quickly reapply for all its licenses creates significant uncertainty for all broadcasters.

Disney has defended its record, with a spokesperson stating the company has a “long record” of operating in full compliance with FCC rules. The company indicated it is prepared to defend its qualifications under the First Amendment and the Communications Act through legal channels.

Legal experts note that the FCC faces a high bar to strip licenses. Public interest lawyer Andrew Jay Schwartzman stated that the legal standard for license revocation is “insurmountable,” as the FCC must prove the most gross forms of misconduct.

Expert Insight: The core of this conflict lies in the intersection of regulatory employment obligations and First Amendment protections. If the FCC attempts to link license renewals to programming content or the employment of specific personalities, they may face severe legal challenges regarding free speech.

Potential Next Steps

The FCC could attempt to decline the renewal of ABC’s licenses, which are typically granted in eight-year terms. However, this may trigger a lengthy legal process involving an administrative law judge and multiple appeals.

Trump FCC challenges ABC’s licenses amid Kimmel controversy

Another possible path is license revocation, though experts suggest this is unlikely given that such actions have almost never been exercised for TV stations in recent decades.

If the FCC pursues the case, it would likely need to document exactly how Disney’s diversity policies are discriminatory. Analysts suggest that focusing on programming issues rather than DEI could create further complications under the First Amendment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the FCC reviewing ABC’s broadcast licenses?

The review is part of an investigation into whether Disney’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies violate federal anti-discrimination rules, including allegations of race-based hiring and the use of identity quotas.

What are the possible outcomes of this review?

The FCC has the authority to either decline to renew the licenses or revoke them entirely. However, legal experts suggest both actions face a exceptionally high legal bar.

How many stations are affected by this order?

The order affects ABC’s eight TV stations, which include WABC-TV in New York and KABC-TV in Los Angeles.

Do you believe government regulators should have the authority to review broadcast licenses based on a company’s internal hiring and diversity policies?

You may also like

Leave a Comment