Crin Antonescu has identified Alexandru Nazare as the only viable solution for the Romanian premiership, citing Nazare’s technical expertise and diplomatic experience. Speaking to Antena 3 CNN, the former liberal leader explicitly rejected Ilie Bolojan for the role, claiming Bolojan served primarily as an “electoral asset” for Nicușor Dan during the campaign.
Why Crin Antonescu Backs Alexandru Nazare for Prime Minister
Antonescu argues that Alexandru Nazare possesses the specific professional profile required to end the current governance crisis. According to Antonescu, Nazare is the only solution who responds to the essential points that you ask of a prime minister and in the situation we find ourselves in.
The former liberal leader pointed to Nazare’s tenure as Minister of Finance, specifically his second mandate in that role. Antonescu stated that Nazare handled the critical communications with the European Commission, banking institutions, and international creditors, rather than Ilie Bolojan.
Beyond financial management, Antonescu highlighted Nazare’s diverse political background. He noted that Nazare had been a parliamentarian, an MEP, and had also been a minister at other portfolios, providing him with a broader administrative scope than his competitors.
Did you know? According to Crin Antonescu, the ability to dialogue with political forces is important in a coalition government—a skill he attributes to Alexandru Nazare.
The Rejection of Ilie Bolojan as a Governing Option
In a direct response to Antena 3 CNN, Antonescu confirmed he would not have appointed Ilie Bolojan as prime minister had he won the presidency. He distinguished himself from other top candidates by stating he never said he would put Mr. Bolojan as prime minister.
Antonescu characterized Bolojan’s role in the electoral process as strategic rather than administrative. He asserted that Nicușor Dan utilized Bolojan in the electoral campaign as an “electoral asset”.
Comparing the Profiles: Nazare vs. Bolojan
Implications for Nicușor Dan and the Governance Crisis
Antonescu extended his analysis to the current leadership, suggesting that Nicușor Dan should have designated Nazare for three months. He maintains that naming Nazare remains the way for Dan to finish this crisis in an honorable way and with a governing solution.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who does Crin Antonescu believe should be Prime Minister?
Crin Antonescu has stated that Alexandru Nazare is the only solution for the premiership due to his experience in finance and European diplomacy.
What was Antonescu’s view on Ilie Bolojan?
He stated he would not have appointed Bolojan as prime minister, viewing him as an “electoral asset” for Nicușor Dan rather than a governing choice.
What specific experience does Alexandru Nazare bring?
According to Antonescu, Nazare brings experience as a Minister of Finance, a parliamentarian, an MEP, and a minister at other portfolios.
What do you think about the shift toward technocratic leadership in Romania?
Share your thoughts in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for the latest political analysis.
Related reading