Trump Escalates Trade War: 15% Tariffs Loom After Supreme Court Defeat
Following a Supreme Court ruling that struck down his previous tariff program, former President Donald Trump announced a temporary 15% tariff on imports from all countries – the maximum allowed under a separate law known as Section 122. This move signals a potential escalation of trade tensions and introduces significant uncertainty for global commerce.
Supreme Court Ruling and the IEEPA Challenge
The Supreme Court’s decision centered on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), finding that Trump had exceeded his authority when imposing a broad array of tariffs under the guise of a national economic emergency. The court’s 6-3 ruling doesn’t address potential refunds for the over $200 billion in tariffs already paid by importers, a point Justice Brett Kavanaugh raised in his dissenting opinion, suggesting potential complications and the need for government refunds.
Section 122: A New Avenue for Tariffs
Trump’s swift response leverages Section 122, a previously untested law requiring congressional approval to extend tariffs beyond 150 days. This presents a key challenge: the Republican-majority Congress may be hesitant to extend the tariffs, particularly given polling data indicating growing public dissatisfaction with the duties and their contribution to higher prices. The White House has indicated exemptions for critical minerals, metals, and energy products.
Potential Trade Impacts and Winners/Losers
The immediate impact is widespread uncertainty for trading partners. Trump has signaled his intention to explore other “legally permissible” tariffs during the 150-day window, potentially relying on statutes allowing import taxes based on national security or unfair trade practices. Some countries could benefit from the shift. For example, Brazil, which currently faces a 40% tariff rate, could see its rate temporarily reduced to 15%. Conversely, countries like Malaysia and Cambodia, with negotiated rates of 19%, will continue to be taxed at that level.
The Broader Economic Context
This escalation comes as Trump’s approval rating on economic handling has been declining, with a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll showing 34% approval and 57% disapproval. The employ of tariffs has historically been a key component of Trump’s economic strategy, often used to extract concessions from trading partners.
Legal Challenges and Future Outlook
The invocation of Section 122 is likely to face further legal challenges, given its untested nature. Trade experts, like Wendy Cutler, a former senior US trade official, express surprise at the initial 15% rate, highlighting the unpredictable nature of the current trade landscape. Trump’s insistence on retaining tariff power, even after the Supreme Court ruling, underscores his commitment to this strategy.
Pro Tip
Businesses heavily reliant on imports should proactively assess their supply chains and explore alternative sourcing options to mitigate potential disruptions caused by the evolving tariff situation.
FAQ
Q: What is Section 122?
A: Section 122 is a law allowing tariffs up to 15%, but requires congressional approval for extension beyond 150 days.
Q: Will the Supreme Court ruling result in refunds for importers?
A: The court did not rule on refunds, but Justice Kavanaugh suggested they may be required, potentially totaling billions of dollars.
Q: What is IEEPA?
A: The International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which the Supreme Court ruled Trump exceeded his authority under.
Q: How long will the 15% tariffs last?
A: The tariffs are temporary, lasting up to 150 days unless Congress approves an extension.
Q: What does this indicate for consumers?
A: Increased tariffs could lead to higher prices for imported goods.
Did you know? Trump has frequently described tariffs as his “favorite word,” highlighting their central role in his economic policy.
Stay informed about the latest developments in trade policy. Follow live updates on the New York Times.
