A Gauteng homeowner owing over R681,000 in unpaid levies has been granted leave to appeal a High Court order that declared her luxury property in Pretoria’s Lombardy Estate specially executable for a public auction, after a judge found reasonable prospects that another court could reach a different conclusion on the constitutional proportionality of the foreclosure.
Tshwane Property Foreclosure Battle Leads to Appeal
Lillian Mokgalakane Makgolela and her husband, Kingsley Makgolela, secured the right to challenge the execution order following a legal battle brought by the Lombardy Home Owners Association (HOA). According to court records, Judge Leicester Rock Adams initially ruled in favor of the HOA in May, ordering the 796-square-metre luxury home to be sold at public auction with a set reserve price of R3.5 million.
During the leave to appeal proceedings, Makgolela represented herself. She argued that the initial court committed factual and legal errors, specifically failing to properly determine the property’s true equity and incorrectly assessing its market value. According to her submissions, these miscalculations resulted in a disproportionate execution order.
Judicial Reasoning on Constitutional Proportionality
Judge Adams dismissed several of Makgolela’s procedural complaints, noting that court documents had been properly served and that her submissions improperly revisited underlying debts that could not be relitigated. The judge reiterated that while a foreclosure order limits the right to adequate housing, debtors cannot indefinitely avoid satisfying lawful judgments simply because a home may be lost.
However, the presiding judge shifted stance on the core issue of proportionality. Judge Adams stated that he was persuaded the arguments regarding proportionality warranted higher scrutiny. “I am persuaded that the issues raised by the first respondent… especially the issue relating to proportionality, are issues in respect of which another court is likely to reach conclusions different to those reached by me,” the judge noted, granting the appeal.
Did you know? Courts in South Africa are legally required to carefully balance the competing constitutional interests of homeowners facing eviction against the contractual and financial rights of community home owners associations.
Rejection of Additional Evidence Applications
Alongside granting leave to appeal, the court dismissed Makgolela’s separate application to introduce additional evidence. This material included email correspondence regarding the property valuation and a letter from Absa Bank stating it had not authorized the valuation.
Judge Adams ruled that the application was legally misconceived. According to the court, only an appeal court holds the statutory power to receive further evidence during appeal proceedings.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was the Lombardy Estate property declared executable?
The High Court initially ordered the property to be sold at a public auction after the owners accumulated over R681,000 in unpaid levies owed to the Lombardy Home Owners Association.
What grounds did the homeowner use to secure leave to appeal?
The homeowner successfully argued that there are reasonable prospects another court could reach a different conclusion regarding the constitutional proportionality of the foreclosure order.
Can new evidence be submitted during the leave to appeal stage?
No. According to the ruling, only an appeal court possesses the statutory authority to receive further evidence during actual appeal proceedings.
Stay Informed on Legal Property Rulings
Join our newsletter or share your thoughts in the comments below to follow developments in property law and court judgments across South Africa.
Related reading