The House of Representatives authorized an investigation on Wednesday, March 4, into remarks made by Deputy Minority Leader Jesus “Bong” Suntay regarding actress Anne Curtis. The move comes after widespread condemnation of Suntay’s statements, which were perceived as objectifying a woman.
Investigation Authorized
The House adopted a motion allowing the ethics committee to assess Suntay’s remarks, made on Tuesday, March 4, during impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte. Suntay stated he had sexual fantasies about Curtis even as attempting to defend the Vice President.
Laguna 1st District Representative Ann Matibag, chair of the House committee on women and gender equality, requested the ethics committee review. Matibag stated, in Filipino, “The woman is not a joke, she is not a fantasy, and the dignity of women should never be made the subject of humor within Congress.”
Gabriela Representative Sarah Elago added that objectifying women in Congress has “real-life consequences for women who experience various forms of harassment, discrimination, and abuse every day.”
Suntay has apologized for his remarks, claiming he was “arguing on principles” and that the analogy was “in bad taste and taken in the wrong context.” He stated, “There was no malice intended. If there was malice deduced, I wish to apologize to those offended.”
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the investigation?
The investigation was prompted by remarks made by Deputy Minority Leader Bong Suntay about actress Anne Curtis during impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte.
Who requested the ethics committee review?
Laguna 1st District Representative Ann Matibag, chair of the House committee on women and gender equality, requested the ethics committee review of Suntay’s statements.
What was Suntay’s response to the criticism?
Suntay apologized for his remarks, stating they were made “in bad taste” and without malice, while likewise claiming he was “arguing on principles.”
As the House ethics committee begins its assessment, what message does this send about the boundaries of acceptable discourse within the Philippine legislature?
