JSC finds Mbenenge guilty of gross misconduct

by Rachel Morgan News Editor

The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) has found Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge guilty of gross misconduct and sexual harassment. This ruling overturns a previous decision by a Judicial Conduct Tribunal, which had found the judge guilty of misconduct that did not amount to gross misconduct.

Overturning the Tribunal’s Findings

The case originated from a 2022 complaint filed by Andiswa Mengo, a secretary at the Eastern Cape High Court in Makhanda, who accused Mbenenge of sexual harassment. While a Judicial Conduct Tribunal initially characterized the exchange of WhatsApp messages between the two as a “consensual, flirtatious relationship,” the JSC has now rejected that interpretation.

The JSC argued that the tribunal “understated the significance” of Mbenenge’s actions. Specifically, the commission found that the tribunal failed to account for the massive imbalance of power between a Judge President and a junior staff member.

Did You Know? During the proceedings, Mbenenge’s legal representative, advocate Muzi Sikhakhane, argued that the judge was enacting “Xhosa cultural courting rituals” that could not be understood by a Western or “liberal” worldview.

Lack of Remorse and Judicial Integrity

In its written ruling, the JSC stated that Mbenenge’s conduct constitutes an affront to the propriety of judicial office and the values of the Constitution. The commission noted that the behavior undermines core judicial values, including integrity, accountability, equality, respect, and dignity.

From Instagram — related to Mbenenge, President

The commission further highlighted that Mbenenge showed “no remorse” for his conduct. This finding serves as a significant blow to the tribunal’s original report, which had been chaired by retired judge Bernard Ngoepe.

Expert Insight: This ruling underscores a critical shift in how judicial oversight bodies view power dynamics within the court system. By rejecting the “consensual” narrative in favor of recognizing the power imbalance, the JSC is reinforcing a standard where the seniority of a judicial officer creates a heightened responsibility to maintain professional boundaries.

Potential Impeachment and Suspension

The JSC will now submit its findings, reasons, and the full report to the Speaker of the National Assembly in accordance with the JSC Act. This process opens the possibility of impeachment for the 64-year-old judge under Section 177 of the Constitution.

the commission may call on President Cyril Ramaphosa to suspend Mbenenge. The JSC has requested written arguments from the involved parties regarding whether such a suspension is necessary while the constitutional process to determine his fate continues.

For more on the initial proceedings, you can read the previous report where EC Judge President Mbenenge was cleared of gross misconduct.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the difference between the Tribunal and JSC findings?

The Judicial Conduct Tribunal found Mbenenge guilty of “misconduct simpliciter,” describing the interaction as a consensual, flirtatious relationship. The JSC overturned this, finding him guilty of both sexual harassment and gross misconduct.

Frequently Asked Questions
Mbenenge President Judicial

Who filed the original complaint against Judge President Mbenenge?

The complaint was filed in 2022 by Andiswa Mengo, a secretary at the Eastern Cape High Court in Makhanda.

What could happen to Judge President Mbenenge next?

He may face impeachment proceedings under Section 177 of the Constitution and could potentially be suspended by President Cyril Ramaphosa pending the final decision of Parliament.

How should judicial bodies balance cultural traditions with constitutional standards of professional conduct?

Mbenenge Tribunal | JSC finds Judge Mbenenge guilty of gross misconduct

You may also like

Leave a Comment