A federal judge in Washington dismissed criminal charges on Monday against two former senior FBI counterintelligence officials accused of lying to Congress about the bureau’s Hunter Biden investigation, sharply rebuking the Justice Department for bringing a politically charged case without probable cause.
Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui tossed the criminal complaint against former Foreign Influence Task Force Chief Nikki Floris and former section chief Bradley Benavides during an extraordinary, hour-long oral ruling in federal court. The case had centered on testimony the two officials provided to the House Judiciary Committee in 2023 regarding their knowledge of a laptop abandoned at a repair shop and the bureau’s handling of related counterintelligence operations.
Prosecutors alleged the pair downplayed their involvement in discussions surrounding the laptop and whether it was linked to foreign intelligence operations. But after a three-day evidentiary preliminary hearing that scrutinized the charging documents and featured testimony from the case agent, Faruqui ruled that the government failed to establish probable cause across every element of the false statement offense.
Judge Faruqui Rebukes Prosecutor Strategy and Timing
From the bench, Faruqui delivered a scathing critique of the prosecution’s approach, describing the legal filing as a rush job ordered by the executive branch. He noted that the case was brought through an unusual criminal complaint—a charging document typically reserved for exigent public safety or national security threats—rather than being presented to a federal grand jury.
BREAKING: A judge dismisses a criminal complaint against two former FBI officials accused of lying to Congress about Hunter Biden. https://t.co/QyVNjax369
Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui described the prosecution as a slapdash complaint, spaghetti at the wall, Hunter Biden conspiracy fever dream
while asserting that facts still matter in a courtroom.
The judge also pointed directly to the calendar, noting that the prosecution was brought just ten days before the midterm elections. He criticized the timing and declared that he would not pretend to ignore the political context surrounding the indictment.
During the evidentiary hearings, FBI Special Agent Bryan Witt acknowledged under cross-examination that the investigation was opened at the behest of FBI Director Kash Patel just one day after a primetime address on election security. Witt also candidly admitted that the case had not been handled like any other in his career.
Defense Arguments and the 2020 Task Force Role
Attorneys for Floris and Benavides argued throughout the proceedings that their clients were innocent public servants caught in a politically motivated smear campaign. Legal representation praised the judge for carefully weighing the evidence against the law and rejecting the government’s low burden of proof.
The scrutiny traced back to the Foreign Influence Task Force, a unit established after the 2016 presidential election to police foreign interference. In August 2020, Floris and Benavides delivered defensive briefings to Republican Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson regarding financial connections to foreign governments. Those briefings later drew sharp criticism from GOP lawmakers who accused the bureau of using the sessions to cast their inquiries as vehicles for Russian disinformation.
During the congressional hearings in 2023, lawmakers questioned the officials about their oversight of operations such as Round River
, which prosecutors claimed involved collecting derogatory information on the Biden family and flagging it as foreign influence. Defense lawyers maintained that any contested statements were the result of vague questioning or honest mistakes of memory rather than willful deception.
Legal Fallout and Potential Next Steps for the Justice Department
While the dismissal ends the current criminal complaint led by the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia under Jeanine Pirro, legal avenues remain technically open. Prosecutors could theoretically attempt to present evidence to a federal grand jury to secure an indictment.
However, legal analysts note that such an outcome faces significant hurdles. Grand juries in Washington, D.C., have previously shown skepticism toward politically sensitive cases brought against individuals viewed as targets of the administration. Defense counsel expressed hope that the government would not pursue closed-door grand jury proceedings where the defense cannot present its side.
Faruqui concluded the marathon proceedings by expressing regret for the toll the process had taken on all participants, addressing the defendants directly before adjourning.
This case is dismissed. I am sorry you have been dragged through this process.
Related reading