The Latvian Armed Forces have begun utilizing the Natrix NXU unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) as of early May 2026. The deployment was highlighted during NATO’s Crystal Arrow 2026 military exercise held in Latvia.
Expanding Unmanned Capabilities
The Natrix NXU platform is primarily designed for logistics and casualty evacuation (CASEVAC). However, the vehicle is versatile and can be fitted with a remote weapon station (RWS).
Weaponization and International Collaboration
To enhance the platform’s combat utility, Natrix is collaborating with an undisclosed number of Ukrainian companies. This partnership is focused on integrating a 40 mm MK-19 grenade launcher onto the NXU.
The company is also working to integrate a 7.62 mm FN Herstal Minimi Mk3 machine gun. Kristaps Puke, CEO of Natrix, stated, “We’re going through the test phase with the gun. It is not in production.”
Strategic Integration and Next Steps
The collaboration between the Latvian Armed Forces and Natrix is currently in its early stages. The integration of these systems follows the broader procurement efforts announced by the Ministry of Defence in April.
In the coming months, Natrix is likely to engage in discussions with Latvian personnel. These consultations may lead to additional modifications of the platform to better meet operational requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the primary functions of the Natrix NXU?
The platform’s primary use cases are logistics and casualty evacuation (CASEVAC), though it can also be equipped with a remote weapon station (RWS).
Which weapon systems are being integrated into the UGV?
Natrix is working to integrate a 40 mm MK-19 grenade launcher through collaboration with Ukrainian companies, and is currently testing a 7.62 mm FN Herstal Minimi Mk3 machine gun.
Which companies are involved in the Latvian Ministry of Defence’s UGV contracts?
The Ministry of Defence signed contracts with three Latvian companies: Natrix, Brasa Defence Systems, and LV-Teh.
How might the shift toward unmanned logistics and casualty evacuation change the operational risks for ground troops?
