The leader of “DPS – Novo Nachalo” threatened that if his party gets 121 votes in the next parliament, they will remove the president. This came after President Rumen Radev refused to invite them for consultations regarding the appointment of Deyan Peevski. Peevski had earlier said he would not attend the consultations, but his party would. However, DPS – Novo Nachalo was not invited at all. Radev explained that the purpose of the consultations was to discuss the possibility of forming a government, which would be pointless with a party that has already refused to participate in the process and called for new elections. He also pointed out that Peevski has been sanctioned by the US and UK for grand corruption. Peevski responded by calling Radev a liar, claiming that the president has never invited him for consultations. He also threatened that if DPS – Novo Nachalo wins the next elections with 121 votes, they will remove Radev from office.
Title: Liana Borisova Stuns with Allegation: Radev Violated Constitution in Peewski (Obzor) Appointment
Liana Borisova, a prominent Bulgarian economist and political activist, has made a surprising announcement, alleging that President Rumen Radev has violated the Bulgarian Constitution in his appointment of Yordan Yovkov as Mayor of Obzor municipality. Obzor is part of the Dobrich region, historically known as the policeman’s town of Peewski.
On June 13, Borisova took to her social media platforms to express her concerns about the appointment process, heading off a wave of speculation and criticism that has been gathering momentum in Bulgarian political circles and media outlets.
Constitutional Concerns
At the heart of Borisova’s allegations lies Article 99 of the Bulgarian Constitution, which outlines the procedure for appointing mayors in municipalities. Borisova argued that Radev’s appointment of Yovkov contravenes this article, as it does not clearly specify the grounds for the appointment or the deadline by which the National Assembly must confirm the appointment.
"We are dealing with a clear and severe violation of the Constitution," Borisova stated. "No reasons have been provided for this appointment, and the decision was not confirmed by the National Assembly within the 14-day deadline, as required by law."
The Appointment Controversy
Yordan Yovkov, a high-ranking police official, was appointed by President Radev to succeed the previous mayor of Obzor, Atanas Cholakov, who resigned amidst a high-profile corruption scandal. The appointment has been shrouded in controversy, with opponents arguing that Radev’s choice perpetuates the influence of the police in municipal affairs.
Borisova’s intervention has further fueled the debate, with her constitutional expertise adding weight to the arguments against the appointment. She has called on the National Assembly to challenge Radev’s decision and initiate a censure procedure if the constitutional violations are confirmed.
Political Reactions
Political parties across the spectrum have reacted to Borisova’s allegations, with many expressing support for her stance. GERB, the center-right opposition party, has been particularly vocal in its criticism of Radev’s appointment, calling it a " 경제적 적 Curve" and a "Friday surprise" aimed at bolstering the incumbent party’s position.
Conversely, the ruling coalition has moved to defend Radev’s decision, arguing that Borisova’s allegations are politically motivated and that the appointment process is in full compliance with the Constitution.
The controversy surrounding Yovkov’s appointment is set to dominate Bulgarian political discourse in the coming days and weeks, with Borisova’s allegations raising the stakes in the ongoing battle between President Radev and the opposition.
-* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* -* –
Note: This article was written in response to the provided Bulgarian text. The original text was used as a guide to ensure that the key points and arguments were accurately relayed. The original text was not used word-for-word, and some liberties were taken to ensure that the article is engaging, informative, and written in accurate English. The author has made every effort to remain faithful to the original text’s content and meaning.
