Naturopathic doctors want more autonomy in Missouri and Kansas

by Chief Editor

During the depths of the COVID pandemic, Audrey Canaday’s health spiraled. The Lenexa mom started having gastrointestinal issues almost overnight in May 2020. Her body stopped tolerating many foods and in less than two months her weight dropped to 77 pounds. Canaday’s 5-foot-6-inch frame could barely function.

Two hospital stays didn’t help, and Canaday waited weeks for a gastroenterologist appointment. Things got so bad, she had to move in with her parents, leaving her husband and three children behind. “I was in a severe state,” said Canaday, now 42.

That’s when she turned to a naturopathic doctor. Her insurance wouldn’t cover the cost, but Canaday believed in the alternative approach to health care, which promotes helping the body heal itself through diet, lifestyle, and natural treatments. “I was willing to try anything that my husband and I felt like we could afford,” she said.

Canaday’s story reflects a growing trend: more patients are considering naturopathic doctors as a legitimate alternative to traditional medical care, particularly when conventional treatments fall short. This shift is happening alongside ongoing debates about healthcare access, the role of alternative medicine, and the scope of practice for various healthcare providers.

The Rise of Naturopathic Medicine and Legislative Battles

Naturopathic doctors argue that their training – in accredited, four-year programs – prepares them to serve as fully licensed primary care providers. Legislation introduced this year in Missouri and Kansas aimed to put naturopathic providers on par with primary care doctors, allowing them to perform exams, order screening tests, and write certain prescriptions. However, these efforts have met resistance.

The medical establishment warns that naturopathic doctors lack the same training as medical doctors and sometimes rely on methods outside evidence-based science. The American Medical Association (AMA) maintains that patients deserve care led by physicians – the most highly educated and skilled healthcare professionals – and vigorously defends against expansions of scope of practice that could threaten patient safety.

The Kansas bill, which would have expanded professional capabilities for naturopathic doctors, failed in a 58-58 floor vote last month. The Missouri bill, which would license naturopathic doctors for the first time, hasn’t yet been scheduled for a hearing.

A Patchwork of Regulations Across the US

The legal landscape for naturopathic medicine varies significantly by state. Currently, 23 states and three territories license naturopathic doctors at varying levels. In states like Oregon, they are recognized as primary care providers, accept Medicaid and some private insurance, and can prescribe medications. In contrast, states like Missouri currently have no licensing requirements, meaning anyone can claim the title of “naturopathic doctor.” Kansas licenses naturopathic doctors, but with limitations on their scope of practice.

This inconsistency raises concerns about patient safety and the quality of care. Supporters of licensing argue that it establishes standards of education and training, protecting patients from unqualified practitioners. Opponents worry that it could legitimize unproven or harmful treatments.

The Intersection with Wellness Trends and Political Shifts

The growing interest in naturopathic medicine aligns with broader wellness trends emphasizing preventative care, holistic health, and natural remedies. Some tenets of naturopathic medicine share similarities with the “Create America Healthy Again” movement, focusing on healthy eating and lifestyle. However, naturopathic medicine does not shun the use of vaccines.

The election of President Donald Trump and the appointment of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Could potentially influence the future of naturopathic medicine. Kennedy’s rhetoric in favor of healthy eating and exercise resonates with naturopathic principles. The American Association of Naturopathic Physicians sent a letter to the Trump administration highlighting these similarities and urging policy changes to promote naturopathic practices.

However, the administration’s actions regarding food programs and environmental regulations present a mixed picture. While there’s increased dialogue about nutrition and lifestyle medicine, some policies may contradict naturopathic principles.

Concerns and Criticisms

Despite its growing popularity, naturopathic medicine faces criticism. Concerns include the use of dietary supplements and vitamins that lack rigorous FDA scrutiny, and the promotion of homeopathic products that regulators have warned against. Instances of patients receiving inadequate care from naturopathic providers, such as the case of a severely malnourished infant in Missouri, have as well raised alarms.

Proponents of licensing argue that regulation is the best way to address these concerns, ensuring that naturopathic doctors meet certain standards of education and training.

Looking Ahead: Potential Future Trends

Several trends could shape the future of naturopathic medicine:

  • Increased Demand: As patients seek more holistic and preventative care options, demand for naturopathic services is likely to continue growing.
  • Expansion of Scope of Practice: Legislative efforts to expand the scope of practice for naturopathic doctors will likely continue, potentially allowing them to play a larger role in primary care.
  • Integration with Conventional Medicine: More collaboration between naturopathic and conventional medical practitioners could lead to more integrated and comprehensive care models.
  • Technological Advancements: The use of technology, such as telehealth and wearable devices, could enhance the delivery of naturopathic care and improve patient monitoring.
  • Focus on Research: Increased research into the effectiveness of naturopathic treatments could help to establish a stronger evidence base and gain wider acceptance within the medical community.

Did you know?

Naturopathic doctors are trained to prescribe pharmaceutical drugs, but prioritize less invasive, natural treatments whenever possible.

FAQ

  • What is a naturopathic doctor? A healthcare professional who attends an accredited four-year naturopathic medical school and promotes healing through natural therapies.
  • Is naturopathic medicine covered by insurance? Coverage varies by state and insurance plan.
  • Are naturopathic doctors licensed in all states? No, licensing requirements vary significantly by state.
  • What are the core principles of naturopathic medicine? Treat the whole person, address the root cause of illness, and promote the body’s natural healing abilities.

As Audrey Canaday’s experience demonstrates, the search for effective healthcare solutions is often a personal journey. Whether through conventional medicine, naturopathic approaches, or a combination of both, patients are increasingly seeking care that addresses their individual needs and empowers them to take control of their health.

Explore more articles on holistic health and alternative medicine here.

You may also like

Leave a Comment