Peru’s Presidential Hopefuls Embrace Hardline Security Measures, Raising Concerns Over Human Rights
As Peru prepares for presidential elections on April 12th, a striking trend has emerged: a widespread willingness among candidates to consider drastic measures to combat rising insecurity. The most prominent of these is a potential withdrawal from the Pact of San José, Costa Rica – as well known as the American Convention on Human Rights – to enable the implementation of the death penalty and the use of anonymous judges.
The Rise of “Populist Penal” Policies
Analysts are labeling this shift towards extreme security proposals as “populist penal” policies. A significant number of the 34 candidates participating in the debates have offered tough-on-crime solutions in response to growing public anxiety over extortion and threats from criminal gangs. The increasing insecurity is a major concern for Peruvians, with over 27 million eligible voters heading to the polls.
Key Candidates and Their Stances
Rafael López Aliaga, representing the ultraconservative Renovación Popular party, and Keiko Fujimori, daughter of former President Alberto Fujimori, are both vocal proponents of leaving the Pact of San José. Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Trinidad and Tobago are the only other nations to have taken this step.
López Aliaga has explicitly stated his intention to withdraw from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Corte IDH), which he deems “inhumane,” to facilitate the application of the death penalty and the use of judges operating under anonymity. He also proposed harsh prison conditions, including deprivation of basic necessities for inmates when murders occur.
Fujimori, while also open to withdrawing from the Corte IDH, clarified that her focus isn’t on reinstating the death penalty – arguing it wasn’t necessary to defeat terrorism in the 1990s during her father’s presidency. Instead, she advocates for the return of anonymous judges and a system where prisoners must work for their food.
Beyond the Death Penalty: Extreme Proposals
The proposals extend beyond capital punishment. Álvaro Paz De la Barra, of Fe en el Perú, suggested a national state of exception suspending fundamental rights and guarantees. He proposed life imprisonment without due process, presumption of innocence, or habeas corpus for those convicted of corruption or involvement with criminal organizations.
Paul Jaimes, from Progresemos, claimed the Corte IDH only defends criminals and called for the death penalty for murderers and those who sexually abuse minors.
Voices of Opposition and Alternative Solutions
Not all candidates support these hardline approaches. Ronald Atencio, of the Venceremos alliance, explicitly opposed withdrawing from the Pact of San José, advocating for a solution based on upholding the rule of law.
More centrist candidates, such as Marisol Pérez Tello, Jorge Nieto, and Alfonso López Chau, have focused on investing in intelligence gathering, establishing specialized prosecutor’s offices, and reforming the National Police.
The Implications of Leaving the Pact of San José
Withdrawing from the Pact of San José carries significant consequences. It would mean victims of human rights violations would lose access to international justice through the Corte IDH when the Peruvian judicial system fails. It could also weaken constitutional guarantees and potentially lead to international isolation and sanctions.
What Happens if Peru Leaves the Pact of San José?
Leaving the Pact of San José would have several key implications:
- Loss of International Justice: Victims of human rights abuses would be unable to appeal to the Corte IDH.
- Weakened Rights Protections: Peru would lose a supranational framework reinforcing human rights.
- Potential Isolation: The country could face diplomatic repercussions and sanctions.
Constitutional Amendments and the Death Penalty
Should Peru withdraw from the Pact of San José, any attempt to implement the death penalty would require an amendment to Article 140 of the Constitution to expand the list of crimes punishable by capital punishment.
FAQ
Q: What is the Pact of San José?
A: It’s the American Convention on Human Rights, a treaty establishing a system of protection for human rights in the Americas.
Q: What is the Corte IDH?
A: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights is the judicial body responsible for interpreting and applying the Pact of San José.
Q: Why are candidates proposing to leave the Pact of San José?
A: Primarily to allow for the implementation of the death penalty and the use of anonymous judges in criminal trials.
Q: What are the potential consequences of leaving the Pact?
A: Loss of access to international justice, weakened human rights protections, and potential international isolation.
Did you know? The Pact of San José establishes that human life begins at conception, a point of contention with the Corte IDH’s interpretation.
Pro Tip: Staying informed about the candidates’ positions on key issues like human rights and security is crucial for making an informed decision at the polls.
Explore more articles on Peruvian politics and current events to deepen your understanding of this critical election. Read more here.
Keep reading