“Има такъв народ” refuses government “at any cost”
Borisov: Aсен Василев is hindering my cabinet
GERB and PP-DB are already in conflict over the legal committee, which will examine changes to the Judiciary Act
Find a majority against new elections. This idea was launched by Rumen Radev on the last day of meetings with parliamentary representatives before the mandate roulette for government formation. Its author, however, is Vice President Iliana Iotova, confirmed Radev himself.
At the consultations since Tuesday, the President asked all parliamentary parties (except the uninvited “DPS-New beginning”) how they see the possibilities for this and whether they would participate in joint efforts to stabilize the country through regular government.
Do you see ground for such a coalition in the 51st NS, under what conditions and how it could contribute to the formation of a regular government, Radev asked “Има такъв народ” on the last day of consultations on Thursday.
If the government has no specific goals,
its formation would be just for power consumption,
however, the vice-chairman of the party Toshko Yordanov noted.
ИТН is included in the formula that Boyko Borisov has launched for a majority together with PP-DB and BSP. And if the people of Slavi Trifonov participate, the votes would reach without those of “Промяната”, which refuses to agree with GERB.
A government should have one when it is useful, not at any cost. A government at any cost was the outcome of the last one, and the result is devastating. So, if we are looking for a regular government, it must stand on a specific program with goals. Not just to have one to avoid elections, because it might turn out that such a government, if it is at the scale of the damage caused by the last one, will make us feel worse than if it had not happened, Yordanov said.
But not only the negative response from ИТН is a problem for a government with a first mandate. Borisov asked the President to hand over the folder already on Monday. If we don’t understand this week, there won’t be a next one, he explained to him. It turned out, however, that the official talks have not yet begun before the final weekend. Neither ДБ nor БСП have announced invitations.
We are having talks, we have already determined a negotiating team for a few weeks now: Zhelyazkov, Donchev, Raya, Dani Mitov. When we have something to say, we will say it.
At this stage, Aсен Василев is the one hindering the formation of a government.
We will do everything possible. We see that colleagues from ДБ think differently, there are other parties that do not want Peevski and Vasiliev to go to elections, and we will try to take advantage of that,
Borisov said.
The former prime minister did not answer whether he would personally receive the first mandate from the President, i.e., whether he would be the candidate for prime minister, as GERB’s leading figures demand. During the week, he made it clear that the name would probably be different. The other potential negotiators categorically rejected Borisov as prime minister.
I am sure that GERB will initiate talks with the other parties, as they asked President Rumen Radev for time for the first mandate. But I personally think that first the talks should start between the first two political forces, they are right-wing parties and that is how it should be,
commented Borislav Gutsanov.
Talks are not taking place yet and there are no plans for them. Persistently and very clearly over the past few weeks we have said the following: the questions should be to the first political force, it bears the responsibility for a structured conduct of the negotiating process for the first mandate. Talks on Facebook live, TV interviews or statements in front of the plenary hall doors are not talks at all, clarified Nadya Yordanova from “Демократична България”.
While the other parties wait for an invitation from GERB for talks, leader Boyko Borisov has switched from the political to the football field.
The others are waiting for a invitation from GERB to talk, but they have not started talks yet, even for the distribution of the committees in parliament. But she admitted that during an informal meeting of the presidium, a dispute between GERB-SDS and PP-DB had arisen over who would be the head of the legal one, in which the changes to the Judiciary Act would be examined, for which Kiril Petkov and his people are pushing hard because of the election of Borislav Sarabov as chief prosecutor.
A day earlier, Ivo Miachev had warned that it would not be possible to form a government by Monday. We need a few weeks if we want to have real talks, not just find the next reason to
Title: The Upcoming Anti-Corruption Elections: A Snapshot
Dear readers,
As the dates for the upcoming elections draw near, there’s a significant buzz around one particular campaign that has caught the public’s attention: the anti-corruption initiative. Here, we’ll provide an overview of this promising movement and its key players.
The MOVEMENT
The anti-corruption movement is a grassroots initiative that aims to clean up the political landscape by promoting transparency, accountability, and ethical governance. Their primary goal is to ensure that the upcoming elections are fair, free, and corruption-free.
KEY PLAYERS
-
The Anti-Corruption Coalition (ACC): A consortium of civic organizations, advocacy groups, and concerned citizens, the ACC is the backbone of this movement. They have been instrumental in mobilizing public support, raising awareness, and advocating for electoral reform.
-
Honest Politicians Association (HPA): This group comprises incumbent politicians who have pledged to uphold the highest ethical standards. They are committed to leading by example and fostering a culture of integrity within the political sphere.
- MediaWatch: A media monitoring organization, MediaWatch ensures balanced, fact-based, and impartial coverage of the elections. They also work to expose any attempts to manipulate or distort information for political gain.
THEIR PLATFORM
At the core of the anti-corruption movement’s platform are the following key points:
-
Transparency: They advocate for increased transparency in campaign financing, voting processes, and government activities.
-
Accountability: The movement pushes for stricter accountability measures to deter and punish corrupt activities. This includes tougher laws, independent anticorruption bodies, and more effective enforcement mechanisms.
-
Citizen Engagement: They encourage public participation in the electoral process and political decision-making. This is achieved by promoting voter education, facilitating accessibility to election-related information, and enhancing civic engagement initiatives.
- Integrity Pacts: The movement calls for political parties and candidates to sign ‘Integrity Pacts’ committing to ethical conduct and transparency throughout their campaigns and, if elected, during their tenure.
THE ROAD AHEAD
While the movement’s popularity is evident, several challenges lie ahead. Some of the prominent ones include:
-
Lack of political will: Established political elites may resist changes that could threaten their influence or interests.
-
Inadequate resources: While public support is strong, securing the necessary funding to sustain the movement’s activities and campaigns remains a challenge.
- Time constraint: With elections approaching, time is of the essence. The movement must rapidly scale its efforts to implement meaningful reforms before the polls open.
In conclusion, the anti-corruption movement is a formidable force shaping the upcoming elections. It offers a beacon of hope for those who believe in clean, transparent, and fair governance. With public support and strategic partnerships, there’s no doubt that this movement can make a tangible difference and steer the country towards a corruption-free future.
Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story. Let’s make our vote count!
Yours,
[Your Name]
Senior Correspondent, Political Affairs
