The Sejm’s Justice and Human Rights Committee on Wednesday voted 21 to 13 to support Mateusz Szpytma for the position of President of the Institute of National Remembrance (IPN). The decision comes despite an appeal signed by over 240 academics criticizing Szpytma and alleging the politicization of the IPN.
Mateusz Szpytma’s Qualifications and Concerns
During the committee meeting, Professor Tadeusz Wolsza highlighted Szpytma’s over 20 years of association with the IPN and his expertise in the institution’s work. He specifically noted Szpytma’s research on the history of the Ulma family and his role as the originator and member of the program council of the Ulma Family Museum of Poles Saving Jews in World War II.
However, the nomination has faced opposition. A group of over 240 signatories, including historians such as Professor Rafał Wnuk, Dr. Hab. Dariusz Libionka, Professor Andrzej Friszke, and Professor Andrzej Zakrzewski, issued a statement asserting that Szpytma is a key figure in the increasing politicization of the IPN, characterizing it as effectively an extension of the Law and Justice (PiS) party over the last decade.
During the committee proceedings, MP Tomasz Zimoch read excerpts from the appeal, stating that Szpytma’s appointment would ensure the continuation of the IPN’s current policies, designed to safely navigate upcoming parliamentary elections.
MP Patryk Jaskulski (KO) echoed these concerns, expressing a sentiment that candidates are consistently presented as “worthy” successors to former President Karol Nawrocki, but in a way that perpetuates the institution’s association with a single political side rather than fostering independence and impartiality. He argued for a leader who could restore the IPN’s authority.
Political Reactions and Next Steps
Szpytma refuted the accusations of politicization, stating, “I do not agree with these assessments. It is not the case that the IPN operates to the benefit of only one political option.”
The committee vote saw support from MPs representing PiS, the Polish People’s Party (PSL), and Tomasz Rzymkowski (Direct Democracy). Opposition came from MPs representing Civic Coalition (KO), Sławomir Ćwik of the Center, and independent MP Tomasz Zimoch.
Following the committee’s endorsement, the candidacy of Mateusz Szpytma will now be considered by the Sejm during a plenary session.
Following the vote, MP Przemysław Czarnek of PiS stated on social media that the vote was “excellent” and thanked Piotr Zgorzelski of PSL, noting that he had spoken with Zgorzelski beforehand. He suggested this could be a model for future cooperation. MP Tomasz Zimoch reacted to the outcome by alleging a deal between the PSL and PiS regarding the appointment, questioning the leadership of the Polish People’s Party and appealing for them to engage with protesting academics.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Institute of National Remembrance (IPN)?
The IPN is an institution dedicated to researching and preserving the memory of individuals who suffered as a result of political repressions during the communist era in Poland.
What concerns have been raised about Mateusz Szpytma’s candidacy?
Over 240 academics have signed an appeal alleging that Szpytma is responsible for the politicization of the IPN, claiming it has develop into an extension of the Law and Justice party.
What is the next step in the appointment process?
The full Sejm will now vote on Mateusz Szpytma’s candidacy for the position of President of the IPN.
As Szpytma’s nomination moves to the Sejm, what impact might continued debate over the IPN’s independence have on the broader political climate in Poland?
