издание

Title: Uncontrollable Firestorm: Los Angeles Wildfires Rage On, Forcing Mass Evacuations and Silicon Beach Shutdown

Article:

The wrath of nature is unleashing a fiery inferno unlike any other in the heart of Los Angeles, with terrifying winds of up to 160 km/h fanning the relentless flames. The "Pacific Palisades," home to countless Hollywood stars, is under siege, as reported by the BBC. An unprecedented state of emergency has been declared in Los Angeles County, with Santa Monica and Malibu also in the line of fire. The Woolsey Fire alone has engulfed over 3,000 hectares, claiming lives and leaving thousands without power.

More than 52,000 residents have been evacuation orders, with another 47,000 under warning. According to Poweroutage.us, over 330,000 Californians are left without electricity, including over 223,000 in LA County. Though the numbers fluctuate, as power is gradually restored.

Firefighters are battling the blazes, but "extreme fire behavior" makes containment nearly impossible. The Woolsey Fire has been moving so swiftly that it’s equivalent to burning five football fields per minute. Meteorologists predict that winds will remain strong, with worse conditions yet to come. Residents have described the fire as sudden and unpredictable, with conditions changing rapidly.

Among those affected are some of the most recognizable faces in entertainment. Actors like Tom Hanks, Ben Affleck, and Mark Hamill, best known as Luke Skywalker in "Star Wars," have been forced to evacuate. Hamill tweeted that he fled his Malibu home at the "last possible second," describing the fire as the worst since 1993.

Mid-storyàct breaks

After the break:

The Woolsey Fire is expected to be one of the most destructive in the LA area since 2011, according to the National Weather Service. The unusually hot summer followed by scant rainfall has left the region tinder-dry and vulnerable. Climate change, as factors like UCLA’s Center for Climate Science director Alex Hall notes, is also playing a significant part.

In the meantime, Bulgarian officials have confirmed the safety of the Panagyurishte Treasure at the Getty Museum in Los Angeles. The treasure, along with other Bulgarian artifacts, has been secured in the museum’s fire-resistant vaults. Earlier, Minister of Culture, dr. Nadia typical increased security measures, as the museum faced potential danger from the nearby wildfires.

Headline: Bulgaria‘s Parliament Rushes Through Five Election Reform Bills; DPS-DPS Opposes All

In a swift and somewhat chaotic session, Bulgaria’s National Assembly approved five election law amendments in just over an hour, with minimal debate. The voting concluded at 18:15, leaving many questions unanswered and concerns unaddressed.

Key Debate Points and Votes:

• Restore Trust’s (ITN) proposal: 202 For, 8 Against (DPS-DPS), 9 Abstained (DPS-DPS)
• BSP‘s proposal: 200 For, 3 Against (DPS-DPS), 15 Abstained (DPS-DPS)
• Democratic Bulgaria’s (DB) proposal: 174 For, 37 Against (28 DPS-NN, 9 DPS-DPS), 9 Abstained (DPS-DPS)
• PP’s proposal: 172 For, 39 Against (DPS faction), 6 Abstained (DPS-DPS)
• Revival‘s proposal: 171 For, 45 Against (28 DPS-NN, 17 DPS-DPS), 1 Abstained (DPS-DPS)

The session began at 9:00 AM and culminated around 17:04, with a single, unofficial 45-minute recess. Representatives had just one official 15-minute break, which was extended unofficially. Each party presented its amendatory motions, with DPS-DPS being the sole party to oppose all proposals.

DPS-DPS’s Concerns and Stance:

DPS-DPS deputy Rembzi Osman criticized the rushed process, arguing that past changes to the Electoral Code (IK) had failed to address key issues. He warned that the current proposals could lead to confusion, with potential disenfranchisement of Bulgarian voters abroad andChaotic handling of ballot papers due to the removal of party numbers.

Osman argued that the focus should be on changing politicians’ behavior, not just electoral rules. He expressed doubt that the proposals would address issues like voter turnout and fraud. DPS-DPS demanded that the law changes be reconsidered in a calmer atmosphere, not rushed through before elections.

Other deputies, including ITN’s Alexander Rashhev and Revival’s Svetoslav Todorov, welcomed the debate but voiced support for the respective party proposals, expressing hope that a compromise could be reached during the second reading.

The Assembly then moved on to discussing the Judiciary Act, adjourning around 21:00.

Title: "Bulgaria’s Old Calendarists: A Growing Presence After Decades of Division"

After 56 years of separation, the Bulgarian Old Calendarists (BPCS) have been legally recognized by Bulgaria’s Supreme Cassation Court, raising various questions about their origins, motivations, and potential impact. Here’s a closer look at the group and the implications of their registration.

The Birth of a Splinter Group

The Old Calendarists, also known as the Bulgarian Old Rite, emerged in 1968 when a group of clergy refused to adopt the new calendar and formed a separate community centered around the Knyazhevo Monastery. They argued that the introduction of the new calendar was a compromise with modernity that undermined the authenticity of Orthodox faith.

Financing and Growth

Despite being an unregistered religion, the Old Calendarists have managed to establish a network of around 20 churches and have amassed a community of approximately 1,000 adherents. They’ve been funding their activities through donations, despite paying taxes on their properties and receiving no state subsidies, as reported by BTA.

"Legalization Hunger" and External Support

The Old Calendarists’ recent push for legal recognition is seen by some as an attempt to expand their influence. ProfessorIvanov notes, "They’ve been trying to get registered for a long time. Now they’ve found a loophole in the law." Some observers suggest that the group could be backed by external forces, with speculations pointing towards Russia, the West, or even the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Constantinople.

Legal Concerns and Potential Impact

The BPCS’s registration raised eyebrows due to potential constitutional issues. The Bulgarian Constitution grants special status to the Bulgarian Orthodox Church (BOC), and the opposition party "Democratic Bulgaria" has already tabled a bill to clarify this issue. The BOC’s Holy Synod, meanwhile, denounced the registration, warning of potential schisms.

What’s Next?

Now recognized legally, the BPCS could potentially expand its influence, attract more adherents, and assert more significant demands. However, the BOC remains the dominant religious institution in Bulgaria and is backed by the state. The registration process also seems to have highlighted certain constitutional ambiguities that will likely be addressed in the near future.

SEO Keywords: Bulgarian Old Calendarists, BPCS, Bulgarian Orthodox Church, religious schisms, legal recognition, Bulgaria’s Supreme Cassation Court, unregistered religions, external influences.

Title: Chaos in Parliament: Lawmakers Clash Over Agenda and Ministers’ Hearing

Article:

The Bulgarian National Assembly kicked off its 2025 session with a storm of controversy, as lawmakers griped over a changed agenda and hashed out issues ranging from narco-contraband in vapes to the pricing of electricity. The manic hour of debate ended with a threat to delay the reports on the Electoral Code and the Law on the Judiciary.

The source of the chaos was the speaker herself, Dr. Natalia Kisielova. She sparked anger by inserting the fourth item on today’s agenda, the Law on the Judiciary, into the morning session. The move sent shockwaves through the parliamentary halls, with leader after leader claiming they had no knowledge of the change, demanding further debate before the vote.

Kisielova’s opening remarks of health, success, and happiness for all Bulgarians faltered under the onslaught of complaints. She attempted to rally with the Bulgarian national anthem and the EU’s, but the "Revival" party’s pious protest against Beethoven’s "Ode to Joy" was in stark contrast to the divisiveness already palpable.

Speaker Kisielova appeared before the chairperson’s council to defend her decision, but her explanations fell flat. She was castigated by Roshen Zhilazkov of GERB for not accurately reading the agenda and by Raya Nazarayana for rushing through the Law on the Judiciary’s clauses.

Stanislav Anastasov of DPS-NN accused Kisielova of disregarding his party’s resolutions on energy prices and guanylate cyclase inhibitors. He demanded an immediate vote on their proposals, berating the speaker, "We’ve had rush votes before without a committee consultation. Why not today?"

Paula Mitova of ITN berated Kisielova for oversight and promised a review of the speaker’s performance. Kisielova dug in her heels, repeating that the Law on the Judiciary was today’s fourth point. But Tosho Yordanov of BSP insisted that the Electoral Code was the day’s fifth item, giving Kisielova an ultimatum: delay the Law on the Judiciary or face consequences.

The chairperson’s council finally acquiesced to a re-vote, but the damage was done. Parliament was divided, another victim of Bulgaria’s political squabbles, and the year ahead threatens more of the same.

Bulgarian Parties Resume Government Talks, Hopes for Progress by Friday

In a surprising turn of events, just two days after GERB announced pausing government talks, key parties have decided to resume negotiations. Optimism is high among participants, who believe significant progress could be made by Friday.

Two crucial ‘yes’ votes echoed in the National Assembly yesterday, leading to the revival of negotiations in the budgetary and legal committees. TheiletDNA (DDB) did not support Asen Vasilev’s proposal to scrutinize the caretaker government’s budget, allowing the committee to pass a special law. GERB, meanwhile, backed changes to the judiciary law.

In the upcoming days, all eyes will be on the possibility of a quadripartite coalition’s formation. If negotiations fail, Boyko Borissov is prepared to avoid early April elections by forming a minority cabinet. This option has been discussed among GERB members, who believe they can rally support from BSP, ITN, and Movement 21 (MECH), aggregating 119 deputies and bypassing DDB and PP.

Last weekend, GERB walked away from talks after 21 days of deadlock. The party’s frustration stemmed from DBB’s refusal to accept either of their premier candidates, Boyko Borissov or Rosen Zhelyazkov.

As the political drama unfolds, all parties involved are eager to form a stable government and steer Bulgaria through its ongoing challenges. Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.

Title: Democratic Bulgaria Keeps Promise, GERB‘s Push for New Budget

In a surprising turn of events, Democratic Bulgaria (DB) honored its commitment by voting against the extension of last year’s budget, lending support to GERB’s push for a new budget. Meanwhile, GERB, the party of Prime Minister Boyko Borisov, backed the changes that would halt the appointment of Borislav Saraffov as the new chief prosecutor.

Two key votes took place in the National Assembly’s Budget and Legal Affairs Committees just two days after GERB officially terminated coalition talks. DB’s "yes" vote helped GERB advance its proposal to extend last year’s budget rather than considering the cabinet’s 2025 budget proposal drafted by Finance Minister Ludmila Petkova. This move was a U-turn for DB, who had previously agreed with GERB, the ITN, and BSP to only extend the old budget until the end of March.

"We have an understanding that the new budget frame should be prepared by the regular government," a GBERB party official said.

However, DB’s Martin Dimitrov voted against Asen Vassilev’s, the chair of the committee and a DB MP, proposal to prioritize the cabinet’s projects. Dimitrov, along with his GERB, ITN, and BSP colleagues, voted to approve BSP’s propositions for zero VAT on medicines paid for by the healthcare system and the extension of the zero-rate for bread.

In the Legal Affairs Committee, the three projects to amend the Judiciary Act were approved. These amendments, supported by GERB, aim to block Borislav Saraffov’s appointment as the new chief prosecutor. The vote was a green light for GERB, signaling DB and ITN’s approval. The projects will now move to the plenary session, where another vote is required before they can become law.

While the voting session was underway, GERB acknowledged that they would proceed politically, legally, and responsibly. Party spokespersonrays muttered no surprises about the voting results.

Before the votes took place, all parties observed a respectful silence after President Rumen Radev urged them to not rush into a stalemate. The unofficial agreement was to wait until Wednesday to find out if the quadripartite coalition could be realized. If the negotiations fail, Borisov may attempt to form a minority government instead.

Earlier today, GERB calculated that they had the support of 119 MPs from GERB, BSP, ITN, and MIR; this figure would be sufficient to form a minority government. However, the recent developments show that GERB’s coalition partners from "Yes, Bulgaria" and DB are honoring their agreements. MEP Radostin Vasilev, leader of MIR, was non-committal about supporting a minority government, citing his aspirations to increase his party’s representation in the next general election.

The unexpected decision by "DPS-New Beginning" to support the texts of PPDB and ITN, opposing Saraffov’s election, raised eyebrows in the Legal Affairs Committee. The judicial reforms are set to be voted on next Tuesday.

Former Interior Minister Vuchkov Predicts Drama in CEO Election, backing Sarafo

In a revelation to Nova News, former Minister of Interior, Professor Veselin Vuchkov, has shared his insights into the upcoming election of the Chief Prosecutor, a position set to be filled by Borislav Sarafo, according to Vuchkov.

Vuchkov believes that the Legal Commission in the National Assembly has accepted three bills that could potentially halt these elections. "These bills might be passed, it could be a theatrical play, but I think these bills will indeed materialize," he said. Despite this, Vuchkov maintains that the only candidate for the position, Sarafo, will still be proposed to President Rumen Radev by the Supreme Judicial Council. However, Vuchkov predicts a twist in the tale, "Radev will refuse to sign the decree and send it back for reconsideration, or he might simply hold onto it, leaving us with months of holding the position."

Vuchkov adds that in the coming days, a sort of ‘race’ will ensue. Meanwhile, he also comments on the unpassed proposal in the Budget Committee for increased wages for police and military personnel. "The introduced draft law, which is temporary for two or three months, also provides for an increase in police wages. Regardless of whether a regular budget is adopted later or this extended budget, the wage increase is guaranteed," Vuchkov emphasizes. He concludes by stating that the Ministry of Interior should ensure it fulfills its public contract towards its funders.

Lastly, Vuchkov stresses the urgency for the re-evaluation of the National Security Strategy, which expired in 2018. He advises that everyone should focus on Russia’s aggression towards Ukraine, calling for Europe to reassess its position and policies in light of the current situation.

Headline: Vanesa Kostova’s Childhood Home Transformed into Orthodox Temple in Burgas

Subheadline: Bulgaria’s legendary singer’s former residence in Dolno Ezerovo is now a sanctuary for the Old-Calendar Bulgarian Orthodox Church.

Article:

The humble abode where Bulgaria’s late music icon, Vanesa Kostova, spent her childhood has been reborn as a haven of tranquility and spirituality. The single-story house, once home to the rising star and her mother, a singer in her own right, is now the seat of the Old-Calendar Bulgarian Orthodox Church in Burgas.

Nestled at 15 Ulitsa "Khimik" in the once-rural community of Dolno Ezerovo, now a bustling quarter of Burgas, the house holds a unique place in Bulgarian cultural history. Kostova, who was born in the industrial city of Dimitrovgrad, moved to Burgas as a child with her mother, renting the property during their formative years.

The house, initially owned by local entrepreneur and philanthropist Stoyan Ganchev, passed through various hands after Kostova relocated to Sofia, where she lived with her son, Boian Mihaylov, a respected doctor and accomplished musician. The property’s subsequent fate remains shrouded in mystery, with theories ranging from its nationalization after 1944 to possible private sale without heirs.

Despite her extraordinary career, Kostova rarely spoke of her early life in Burgas. She would, however, acknowledge the influence her mother’s musical journey had on her own legendary path.

Now, the house that nurtured Bulgaria’s beloved "Tonika S.V." star has been meticulously restored and transformed into a place of worship. The Rev. Kiril Tabutov, Burgas’ Old-Calendar Orthodox Church representative, currently manages the property.

Ironically, the Old-Calendar Orthodox Church’s growing presence in Burgas has sparked debate among local churchgoers. Despite longstanding calls for a separate Burgas diocese, the region remains under the Sliвен (Sliven) Diocese’s jurisdiction. The newly formed "BURGAZLII" organization and local mayors have weighed in on the contentious issue, hoping to preserve spiritual unity amidst restituted church properties like Kostova’s childhood home.

Judicial Minister Maria Pavlov: Procedural Changes Aim to Complicate Borislav Saradov’s Appointment as Chief Prosecutor

In a unanimous vote, the Legal Affairs Committee of the Bulgaria Parliament has approved changes to the judiciary law proposed by GERB-UDF, ITN, and Revival. The amendments, which include introducing double majorities for the election of leaders of the Supreme Court of Cassation (VSS) and Supreme Administrative Court (VSAS), were supported by 23 votes from GERB-UDF and ITN, and 20 votes from Revival. The changes are expected to make it more difficult for Borislav Saradov to be appointed as chief prosecutor.

The proposals consist of three main components:

1. Double Majorities: GERB-UDF and ITN’s project reintroduces the concept of double majorities, where decisions for the top courts should be made by a majority of VSS Plenum members elected by judges, following international standards.
2. Appointment Procedure: All three projects suggest increasing the number of votes required for the president to re-nominate the chief prosecutor from 13 to 17 in case of a re-vote.
3. Mandates: GERB-UDF proposes barring individuals from serving two terms as chief prosecutor or head of VSAS and VSS, and preventing former acting judges from running for full terms.

The project from Revival aims to prevent the outgoing VSS from electing the chief prosecutor and the head of VSAS, emphasizing morality as a guiding principle. In contrast, ITN suggests appointing two deputy chief prosecutors and eliminating the possibility of appointing magistrates to unoccupied positions.

Minister of Justice Maria Pavlov and Theodosia Tochkova, head of the Supreme Judicial Council’s inspection body, attended the committee meeting. However, representatives from the Supreme Court of Cassation, Supreme Administrative Court, and Supreme Prosecutorial College could not attend due to ongoing holidays and the courts’ absence from their deliberations.

The next committee meeting is scheduled for January 16, the date set for Borislav Saradov’s appointment as chief prosecutor. Petar Petrov from Revival and Atanas Slavov from GERB-UDF discussed the potential consequences of Saradov’s prolonged tenure.

GERB deputy Raya Nazaryan supports all three projects but noted the lack of input from professional circles. She emphasized the need for a short deadline to finalize the texts, stating that their goal is clear, and they will approach the issue responsibly. Alexander Rashkov from ITN and BSP – United Left also highlighted the absence of professional input and the need to swiftly finalize the texts.

Judicial Minister Maria Pavlov criticized the rushed nature of each subsequent judicial reform, stating, "This is not the way – hastily and piecemeal. The procedure will not end on January 16; this is a lengthy process."

Parliamentary Committee Approves Four Electoral Code Amendment Bills at First Reading

In a significant development, the Legal Affairs Committee has approved four bills proposing changes to the Electoral Code at first reading. The move splits the committee’s political Landscape, with "DPS-Novo عيدChooser" voting against.

ITN’s Radical Proposal

Leading the charge was ITN with its comprehensive project, which includes a novel provision for the establishment of electoral commissions. This innovation aims to oversee the tallying of votes transparently and effectively.

GERB‘s 91-Point Plan

GERB presented a vast proposal covering 91 articles. Their flagship changes include dismantling the traditional paper ballot box ("We believe it should vanish from the electoral process," explained Petr Petrov) in favor of digital innovation.

Videosurveillance and Section Caps

GERB also backed video surveillance during the aggregation of results and proposed a cap on the number of electoral sections outside the European Union (a move opposed by other factions due to logistical concerns).

BSP, PP, and DPS-Novo مابisperse Their Views

Diverse opinions echoed through the committee as BSP and PP presented their respective proposals. BSP advocated for a return to mechanical counting machines, dubbing it a vote of confidence in citizens’ trust. PP, on the other hand, routed for greater flexibility in electoral procedures without elaborating on specifics.

ITN and GERB.animate Unity

In a rare display of bipartisanship, both ITN and GERB signaled support for all four bills at first reading, vowing to work together to refine the proposals by the second reading.

The ‘Hurry Up, Slow Down’ Dilemma

Maia Manolova, a guest at the committee, cautioned that the Supreme Court’s ongoing case on electoral procedures might stump future plans. She urged against hastening the electoral process (despite political pressures), warning that repercussions could be severe if the Court’s ruling is overlooked. Time, it seems, remains of the essence in Bulgaria’s democratic journey.