Россия

Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,037 – Al Jazeera”>Russia‘s Military Mobilization: A 8-10 Year War on Ukraine Possible

According to retired Ukrainian general and former Joint Forces Commander, Sergei Naiev, Russia could sustain a full-scale war with Ukraine for up to 8-10 years given its current mobilization resources. In a Radio NV interview, Naiev revealed that by 2024, around 400,000 people had signed contracts to serve in the Russian armed forces, including 65,000 former prisoners.

Russia’s Military Might

Naiev noted that the Russian army currently stands at over 2 million personnel, with over 1.5 million active soldiers. He also shared that Russia has been rapidly forming new regiments, with approximately 15 territorial control regiments created in 2024, and two motorized rifle divisions still in the process of formation.

However, Naiev warns that Russia’s ability to replenish its military hardware won’t keep pace with its losses in Ukraine. Due to extensive equipment destruction by Ukrainian forces, Russia has been forced to deplete its storage stockpiles, which previously held around 12,000 tanks and 10,000 old-model armored vehicles.

Long-term War Strategy

Naiev’s insights align with previous statements by Ukrainian officials, such as the Chief of Staff of the Ukrainian Presidential Office, Andriy Yermak, who suggested that Russia aims to maintain the capability to wage war for several years.

Read more:

• Ukraine’s Defense Minister on Russia’s War Plans
• Russia’s Military Conscription Changes: A Closer Look

Russia‘s Occupation of Ukraine: A Permanent Fixture?

In the current geopolitical climate, the prospect of Russia returning occupied territories to Ukraine appears nil, according to journalist Vitaly Portnikov. As long as the Federal Security Bureau (FSB) maintains dominance in Russia, this sensitive topic is likely to be off the table in negotiations between Moscow and Kyiv.

Portnikov, speaking on the "Espreso" channel, emphasized that Russian President Vladimir Putin has refrained from specifying a timetable for reasserting control over the Kursk region. Similarly, the timeline for Russian forces to fully seize all Ukrainian territories reportedly annexed—namely Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson regions—remains uncertain.

Russian forces, Portnikov pointed out, are not merely seizing territories but are also committed to restoring and developing these regions. The journalist highlighted that Russia’s expenditure on territories in Eastern Ukraine far exceeds its investment in regions like the Primorsky Krai in the Far East.

Ausdruckend seiner Überzeugung betonte Portnikov, dass das Thema der Rückgabe der von Russland besetzten Gebiete an die Ukraine niemals Teil des Verhandlungsprozesses zwischen Moskau und Kiew sein wird, solange Russland von Vertretern des FSB und Personen geführt wird, die in schyttische Ideale vertieft sind. Die Clayierung, dass russische Truppen als politisches Denkmalen einmal die ukrainischen Gebiete verlassen könnten, wird als verschwindend gering eingestuft. Die Ukrainian wird verbleiben auf dem Geaë Werband entsch строен militärisch gegen russische Aggression verteidigt werden kann.

Title: Trump‘s Return: Expert View on Russia–Ukraine Peace Deal in 2025

As the world waits for Donald Trump’s return to the White House, questions arise about his plans for international relations, particularly concerning Russia and Ukraine. Newsweek surveyed experts to gauge the likelihood of a peace deal in 2025 between Russia and Ukraine.

The Genesis of the Conflict and Suggestions for Resolution

Freshly elected U.S. President Trump has expressed his intent to broker peace talks between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin in early 2025. However, experts disagree on the feasibility of this mission.

Fabrice Ponast, the current CEO of Rasmussen Global and ex-Director of Political Planning at NATO, believes that a just peace agreement is essential to keep the world at peace. Ukraine has shown readiness for negotiations, but a perception of fairness among the Ukrainian people is crucial for a lasting peace. Ponast also underscored the significance of NATO membership for Ukraine’s security, suggesting that European nations demonstrate their commitment to underwriting these guarantees.

Vladimir Milov, a former Russian Deputy Minister of Energy and opposition politician, posits that a 2025 peace deal may result from U.S. administration pressure and mutual exhaustion between Ukraine and Russia. Still, Milov cautions that any agreement may be fragile, resembling the failed Minsk accords.

U.S. Role and Sanctions in the Negotiations

Cory Shaio, a senior research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, asserts that any 2025 peace accord demands sustained U.S. and Western support for Ukraine. He notes that Trump’s administration could طبص الثامن والأربعين clocks change with sanctions on Russian oil, making further aggression unaffordable.

Meanwhile, geopolitical expert Charles Kupchan predicts a truce but doubts a comprehensive peace agreement. He envisages a "frozen conflict" scenario akin to the Korean Peninsula, wherein Russia and Ukraine mutually recognize the current frontline as a de facto border.

Russian Intentions and Western Fatigue

Kateryna Stepanenko, a Russia-focused analyst at the Institute for the Study of War, deems a 2025 Russian-Ukrainian peace deal unlikely, as the Kremlin aims to eliminate the Ukrainian state. Conversely, former U.S. State Department Director Anne-Marie Slaughter believes a ceasefire could grant Russia a respite and enable Ukraine to rearm.

James Shea, an associate fellow at Chatham House, notes growing U.S. and European fatigue with supporting Ukraine. While they may nudge Ukraine towards talks, a genuine peace seems improbable in 2025 due to complex negotiations and substantial Western investments required.

Previous Statements on Russian-Ukraine Dialogue

Recently, Former U.S. Army Europe Commander Ben Hodges opined that Russia’s eagerness for negotiations hinges on winning the war. Former U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul previously outlined how increased military aid to Ukraine could pressure both sides to engage in talks.

Stay tuned for further developments in the Russia-Ukraine conflict and Trump’s approach to international relations upon his return to the White House.

Headline: Syrian Citizens to Russia’s war in Ukraine – CNN”>Ukraine: Stay United, Persevere, and You WillPrevail Against Russian Occupation

In a show of solidarity, Syrians, who have recently witnessed the fall of the Assad regime, have a message for the people of Ukraine as they grapple with Russian occupation. A British-Lebanese journalist, Oz Katerji, interviewed Syrians in Damascus, posing questions about their thoughts on Ukraine, Russia, and their advice for Ukrainian citizens.

The resounding sentiment from the Syrians was one of empowerment and hope. They encouraged the Ukrainian people to remain patient and steadfast, urging them to continue their resistance until victory is achieved. "Russia killed our country, killed our people, violated all the norms, killed innocents," a man said, recalling Russia’s presence in Syria. "I want to tell the Ukrainian people to continue their revolution. They will win, just like we did."

Others echoed this sentiment. A woman wished for Ukrainian unity and staying power, stating, "We, Syrians, resisted and were united, and, fortunately, we defeated Bashar al-Assad." She expressed her hope that Ukrainians would experience the same liberating joy soon. Another added, "My message to the Ukrainian people from Syria is: stay strong, work together. Teamwork never fails. I believe in you, guys. You are really good people, and God is always with you and will always help you. Evil always loses."

The UK’s Fund for Journalism Integration funded Katerji’s trip to Syria, where he documented murder, torture, and disappearances by Assad’s regime and Russia. His findings highlight the stark similarities between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and Syria, further solidifying the powerful connection Syrians feel towards the Ukrainian struggle.

Last year, Ukraine called on Syria’s new leadership to remove Russian troops from their soil. Despite the conflict, the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry hinted at the possibility of restoring relations with Syria once the situation stabilizes.

The world watches as Ukraine battles Russian aggression, echoing the resilience demonstrated by the people of Syria during their own struggle against oppression and foreign interference. As both nations fight for sovereignty, their shared plight serves as a poignant reminder of humanity’s relentless pursuit of freedom and justice.

Headline: Russia Standing at the Brink of Revolution: The Inevitable Fall of Putin‘s Regime

Article:

Brace yourself for a seismic shift in the geopolitical landscape as Russia teeters on the edge of a socio-political abyss in 2024. Russian analyst Anatoly Nesmiyan has sounded a stark warning, predicting an implosion of the Russian political and social system, with its leadership’s myopic focus on decimating alternative narratives hastening its own downfall.

Nesmiyan asserts that Russia’s current trajectory echoes the harbingers of the 1917 revolution, which saw the Russian Empire crumble under the weight of World War I and internal strife. His prognosis is bleak: Russia stands on the precipice of a revolution, civil war, and a power struggle reminiscent of the Romanov era’s chaotic unraveling.

The seminal issue, according to Nesmiyan, is that Russia’s governance model, rooted in mobilization dynamics, has reached itslimit. Instead of fostering stable development, Putin’s regime thrives on perpetual crises, clinging to power through control and subterfuge. Yet, this strategy sows discord within the ruling elite, setting the stage for an internal clash of titans.

As resources dwindle, internal schisms within the elite sharpen, echoing the fractious atmosphere preceding the 1917 revolution. Nesmiyan contends that an elite-led coup or civil conflict is now unavoidable, with rival factions vying for power and plunging the nation into further chaos.

The Inevitable Revolution

Nesmiyan is unequivocal: Russia will experience revolutionary changes, but their character will hinge on the dynamics of the elite power struggle. Despite this, he remains skeptical of the emergence of ‘ narodnye lidery’—charismatic leaders capable of galvanizing the masses. He suggests that the current political landscape is suffocating, rendering such figures mere proxies for external or internal forces.

The Russian leader’s penchant for fomenting crises to retain power is, ironically, expediting his regime’s demise. Nesmiyan compares the impending collapse to the February 1917 revolution, but raises doubts about the recurrence of an October-style Bolshevik takeover, citing the lack of a unifying figure capable of mobilizing the multitude.

As 2025 approaches, Nesmiyan foresees a prolonged crisis leading to catastrophe. While the inevitability of change is clear, its nature and consequences remain a cipher.

Meanwhile…

In unrelated news, prominent regional banks in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have begun predicate scrutiny andBeen massively blocking transactions of Russian entrepreneurs.

Russian President Vladimir Putin Signs New ‘Countering Extremism’ Strategy

Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a decree outlining a new strategy to counter extremism in the country. The document, published on the official portal of legal information, updates the previous strategy that had been in effect since 2020.

In a significant development, the new strategy introduces the term "Russophobia" to describe "negative, biased, hostile attitudes towards Russian citizens, the Russian language, and culture." It also includes discriminatory actions by authorities of "unfriendly states" towards Russia.

The new strategy highlights serious threats from the spread of neofascist ideas, the growth of radical nationalist armed groups, and foreign interference. It identifies Ukraine as a key source of these threats, arguing that the "Ukrainian crisis" is being exploited by unfriendly states to wage hybrid wars against Russia and stir up anti-Russian sentiment.

Uncoordinated protest actions, often intentionally fomented into mass disturbances, and migrations contributing to criminal activities are also flagged as factors contributing to instability.

To tackle these issues, the strategy proposes tracking individuals traveling abroad for extremism training or to attend centers in "unfriendly states," though details of which centers and what data will be collected are not specified. The document also outlines measures to combat online extremism, including data analysis and de-anonymization techniques.

"Ukraine‘s Resilience: Former Propagandist Acknowledges Success Despite Russian Attacks"

A surprising turn in the information war has emerged as Russian collaborator Oleh Tsarev admitted that Ukraine, far from being ‘destroyed’ as he had long claimed, is thriving in military production. Tsarev’s revelations underscore the failure of Russia’s aggression and the resilience of the Ukrainian people and industry.

Met with shock, Tsarev recently discovered Ukraine’s astonishing military industrial strength. Data from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine shows a remarkable surge, with the production of weapons and military transport more than doubling since 2014. These developments starkly contradict Tsarev’s previous narratives and the broader Russian propaganda machine.

"Ukraine’s defense industry isn’t just surviving, it’s thriving," Tsarev noted, acknowledging that these achievements undercut the Russian narrative. Indeed, Russia’s intended weakening of Ukraine has backfired, with the country not only preserving but bolstering its industrial base under adversity.

Commenting on Tsarev’s admissions, journalist and blogger Dенис Казанский remarked, "Unfortunately, Tsarev didn’t specify the fate of thousands of Russian rockets. Supposedly, they should have decimated all military factories by now. His post is essentially an acknowledgment of Russia’s failure to hit any significant targets, instead senselessly attacking civilian areas."

These revelations raise serious questions about the effectiveness of Russia’s ‘precision’ strikes and spotlight Ukraine’s enduring resistance and growing strength. Previously, Dialog.UA reported that Kyiv’s weapons outrange Britain’s Storm Shadow and SCALP munitions.

Author: Mark Voroshilov

Title: Russia – BBC”>Ukraine Conflict Nears Endgame as World Powers Weigh Peace Scenarios

Meta Description: As Russia gains ground in Ukraine, Western media reports suggest a peace agreement may be nearer than ever. How the conflict might conclude and Ukraine’s future security come under scrutiny.

Article:

The war in Ukraine appears to be entering its final stages, with numerous outlets suggesting a peace deal could be on the horizon. While former U.S. President Donald Trump has stated resolving the conflict is a top priority, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky insists there will be no freezing of conflict or capitulation.

Ukraine Rejects Conflict Freeze

President Zelensky maintains that Ukraine will not capitulate to Russia or agree to freezing the conflict. In an interview, he stressed that Ukraine has been fighting for its sovereignty for years and will not compromise its independence. Zelensky noted that while Trump is eager to resolve the conflict swiftly, he currently lacks access to crucial intelligence and diplomatic channels.

Putin Open to Peace Talks?

The New York Times reports that despite Ukraine’s mounting losses, President Vladimir Putin remains open to discussing a peace agreement with Trump. Citing five sources familiar with Putin’s thinking, Reuters reports that the Russian leader is open to talks but rejects any significant territorial concessions and insists Ukraine abandon its NATO aspirations.

Analysts predict several possible outcomes for the conflict and Ukraine’s future security. The New York Times highlights four scenarios: Ukraine joining NATO, a coalition replacing U.S. protection, European troop deployment, or a armed neutrality scenario. Meanwhile, Reuters reports three ‘peace plans’ proposed by Trump’s team, all of which reject Ukraine’s NATO bid.

Trump: The Key to Peace?

Trump’s team believes he may be the only figure capable of uniting both sides for meaningful peace talks. However, it remains unclear if Trump has a concrete plan to end the conflict.

Watch: Video Link – Ukraine Conflict: Endgame or Stagnation?

Title: Biden Set to Approve New Security Aid Package for Ukraine

U.S. President Joe Biden is poised to approve another security assistance package for Ukraine in the coming days, White House officials confirmed during a press briefing on Friday, December 27. The package will reportedly include systems to strengthen Ukraine’s air defense capabilities, a crucial element in its ongoing defense against Russian attacks.

John Kirby, the National Security Council Coordinator for Strategic Communications, reiterated the U.S.’s unyielding commitment to bolstering Ukraine’s air defense systems, particularly following the recent deliberate strikes on Ukrainian regions during the Christmas holiday.

"In the next several days, Ukraine will receive another security assistance package from the United States," Kirby said. "This package will include, of course, air defense systems to help Ukraine repel these attacks and continue its defensive operations against the Russian aggression."

This announcement comes on the heels of reports that the U.S. will soon unveil the final package under the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI), utilizing remaining funds earmarked for the purchase of new military equipment for Ukraine.

On December 26, President Biden condemned Russia‘s massive attacks on Ukrainian regions over the Christmas holiday and pledged to enhance Ukraine’s air defenses. Coincidentally, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba held a phone call with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken on the same day to discuss bolstering Ukraine’s air defense systems and maintaining international pressure on Russia.

With the U.S. continually demonstrating its support for Ukraine, both parties remain focused on countering Russia’s military actions and strengthening Ukraine’s defensive capabilities, especially its air defense systems.

Title: The World Under Trump: A Perfect Storm of Uncertainties

In just 20 days, on January 20, 2025, Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the President of the United States, marking the beginning of a new era. America, the world’s most powerful nation, is at a crossroads, with Russia and China eager for change. Here’s what could unfold during Trump’s presidency, according to a scenario analysis by the Financial Times.

A New Grand Bargain
Trump strikes deals with Russia and China, granting them spheres of influence while focusing on U.S. dominance in its own region. He imposes a peace deal on Ukraine, with no security guarantees. Sanctions on Russia are eased, and Vladimir Putin is invited to a Thanksgiving dinner at Mar-a-Lago. With China, the U.S. loosens tech restrictions and tariffs in exchange for increased Chinese purchases and favorable business deals. U.S. allies in Europe and Asia scramble to fortify their defenses in an increasingly unstable world.

The Slippery Slope to War
Escalating geopolitical and economic tensions weaken the West. China, Russia, or North Korea—alone or in combination—launch surprise attacks, drawing the U.S. into a conflict reminiscent of the world wars of the 20th century.

A World Leaderless and Lawless
Trump’s "America First" policies on trade, security, and international institutions create a power vacuum. Global conflicts intensify, refugee crises escalate, and populist forces strengthen. More nations descend into "violent anarchy."

A World Without America
The U.S. exits the World Trade Organization and imposes protectionist tariffs. Europe signs new trade deals with Latin America, India, and China, embracing Chinese electric vehicles and clean tech in exchange for Chinese investments and containment of Russian aggression. The global South integrates further with the Chinese economy, strengthening BRICS nations. The dollar’s status as the world’s primary currency erodes.

America First: Mission Accomplished
Trump’s belief in American exceptionalism is validated. Investment flows into the U.S., solidifying its tech and financial leadership. Europe and Japan bolster their defenses, deterring Russian and Chinese aggression. China’s economic growth stalls, triggering a crisis in its system. The Iranian regime collapses. Trump’s prestige soars both at home and abroad. Critics are silenced, some even incarcerated. Stock markets reach new highs.

The reality of the next four years will likely be a peculiar blend of these scenarios, compounded by unexpected twists. As Italian philosopher Antonio Gramsci once wrote, "The old is dying, and the new cannot be born. In this interregnum, a great variety of morbid symptoms appear."

Read Also:
Trump’s Plan for America: Death Penalty Restoration and Ukrainian Peace

After his inauguration, President-elect Donald Trump plans totask the Department of Justice with reinstating the death penalty for violent criminals, stating that it is needed to protect American families and children from criminals, murderers, and monsters. Regarding the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, Trump repeatedly vowed to resolve it within 24 hours but later acknowledged the complexity of ending Russian aggression. His special envoy for Ukraine, General Keith Kellogg, assured that Trump will strive for a just and durable peace in Ukraine.

You may also be interested in:
Russia-Ukraine War: Latest Developments and World Response
Global Trade: The Shifting Landscape Under Trump