• Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World
Newsy Today
news of today
Home - DEST:OCADNM
Tag:

DEST:OCADNM

News

Trump Claims US Would Benefit Without USMCA Agreement

by Rachel Morgan News Editor June 17, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

President Donald Trump stated Wednesday that the United States could fare better without the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). While the president expressed a preference against the existing trade pact, he acknowledged he may still sign a renewal. The three nations face a July 1 deadline to approve the agreement or signal an intent to exit, which would trigger a 10-year transition period.

Did You Know? The USMCA and its predecessor have integrated the North American economy to the extent that nearly $1.6 trillion in trilateral trade occurs annually, with Mexico and Canada purchasing approximately one-third of all U.S. exported goods.

Why the agreement faces uncertainty

The future of the six-year-old trade deal remains unsettled as the U.S. Trade Representative’s Office engages in ongoing negotiations. Talks in Washington this week are centered on agriculture and establishing what the office describes as a “level playing field.” A subsequent round of discussions is set for the week of July 20 in Mexico City.

Why the agreement faces uncertainty

The stakes for the U.S. economy are significant, given the current trade deficits. In 2025, the U.S. recorded a $46 billion trade deficit in goods with Canada and a $197 billion deficit with Mexico. Despite these figures, Mexico has maintained its position as the top U.S. trading partner since 2023.

Industry pressure for an extension

Major economic sectors are lobbying for a long-term renewal of the pact. Agricultural groups are pushing for a 16-year extension that includes duty-free status for farm products, improved access to Canada’s dairy market, and clearer provisions for ethanol and genetically modified corn.

Lighthizer testifies on Trump's trade policy, USMCA

Automotive manufacturers are similarly seeking stability. Matt Blunt, who represents General Motors, Ford Motor, and Stellantis, noted that North American auto manufacturing currently faces a competitive disadvantage compared to other regions. He stated that the USMCA renewal serves as an opportunity to address these trade imbalances.

What happens next

If the countries fail to reach an agreement by the July 1 deadline, they may signal an intention to exit the pact. This would initiate a 10-year process, which could provide a window for further negotiations and alterations to the existing framework. Given that 80% of Mexican exports and nearly 70% of Canadian exports are destined for the U.S., the outcome of these talks will likely dictate the landscape of continental trade for the coming decade.

What happens next

Expert Insight: The tension between the administration’s skepticism and the private sector’s demand for predictability highlights the fragility of integrated supply chains. While the threat of withdrawal serves as a bargaining tool, the sheer volume of $1.6 trillion in annual trade suggests that any departure from the current framework would create profound, long-term disruptions for both domestic manufacturers and regional exporters.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the deadline for the USMCA renewal?
The three participating countries must approve a renewal of the existing agreement by July 1 or signal their intention to exit the pact.

What are agricultural groups seeking in the negotiations?
They are urging an extension of the agreement for 16 years, with a focus on duty-free farm products, better access to the Canadian dairy market, and new provisions for ethanol and genetically modified corn.

What happens if the countries signal an intent to exit the USMCA?
An exit signal would trigger a 10-year process, which would effectively buy time for the countries to negotiate potential alterations to the agreement.

How would a shift away from the current trade agreement impact your local economy or industry?

June 17, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Canada Committee Advises Against Euthanasia for Mental Illness Alone

by Chief Editor June 17, 2026
written by Chief Editor

A Canadian parliamentary committee has formally recommended that the federal government indefinitely exclude mental illness as a sole qualifying condition for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID). The report, released in June, warns that the medical and legal systems currently lack the safeguards necessary for the safe and equitable implementation of euthanasia for psychiatric conditions. Justice Minister Sean Fraser stated the government will spend the coming weeks reviewing the recommendations before finalizing policy steps.

Why Is Mental Illness Excluded from Euthanasia Eligibility?

The committee’s recommendation centers on the difficulty of determining whether a mental illness is “irremediable,” a core requirement for MAID under Canadian law. According to Trudo Lemmens, chair of health law and policy at the University of Toronto, the unpredictable trajectory of psychiatric conditions makes it nearly impossible for clinicians to satisfy the legal criteria for permanent, incurable suffering. Unlike physical ailments that may have a clear clinical end-point, mental health recovery remains difficult to forecast, creating a high risk of premature death for patients who might otherwise have recovered or found effective treatment.

Why Is Mental Illness Excluded from Euthanasia Eligibility?
Did you know? While 80% of Canadians support MAID for those with terminal physical illnesses, public support drops significantly to 43% when the condition is limited to mental health, according to Angus Reid polling data.

How Does Canada’s MAID Program Compare to Other Countries?

Canada maintains one of the most permissive euthanasia frameworks in the world, having legalized the practice in 2016 for the terminally ill before expanding it in 2021 to include those with non-terminal, incurable disabilities. This approach contrasts sharply with other jurisdictions. While countries like Belgium, the Netherlands, and Spain do allow euthanasia for mental health reasons, the practice remains a subject of intense global debate. Canada’s recent move to delay the inclusion of mental health reflects a cautious pivot, as the government faces mounting pressure from both disability advocates and civil rights groups.

What Are the Legal Challenges Facing the Government?

The Canadian government is currently navigating two opposing legal battles regarding the scope of its MAID program:

They Approved Her for MAID: The Terrifying Reality of Canada’s New Policy
  • Disability Rights Concerns: Disability advocacy groups argue that expanding MAID to non-terminal conditions creates a discriminatory environment, potentially pressuring vulnerable individuals to choose death due to a lack of social and economic support.
  • Charter Rights Arguments: Conversely, organizations such as Dying With Dignity Canada contend that excluding people with mental illnesses from the program violates their rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, arguing that it denies them access to the same medical autonomy afforded to those with physical conditions.
Pro Tip: When evaluating end-of-life policy changes, track the “social determinants of health” reported by provincial authorities. Reports of individuals seeking MAID due to poverty or homelessness have become a focal point for critics demanding stronger social safety nets before further expanding assisted dying.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is euthanasia currently available for mental illness in Canada?

No. While the law was initially set to expand to include mental illness as a sole underlying condition, the government has repeatedly delayed this timeline. The latest committee recommendation suggests an indefinite exclusion.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does “irremediable” mean in the context of MAID?

Under Canadian law, a patient must have an “irremediable” medical condition to qualify for MAID. This means the condition cannot be cured, and the patient is experiencing intolerable suffering that cannot be relieved under conditions they consider acceptable.

Who decides the final policy on MAID?

The federal government, led by Prime Minister Mark Carney and Justice Minister Sean Fraser, is responsible for determining the next steps following the receipt of the parliamentary committee’s report.


What are your thoughts on the balance between personal autonomy and the protection of vulnerable populations in end-of-life care? Share your perspective in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for ongoing updates on Canadian health policy.

June 17, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Recent Posts

  • Widespread Fuel Crisis Grips Russia

    June 17, 2026
  • North West’s Viral Chaos: Internet Explodes Over ‘Mess’ – The Story Behind the Backlash

    June 17, 2026
  • Latvia Banned from European Rugby Conference for One Year

    June 17, 2026
  • Onimusha: Way of the Sword Preview

    June 17, 2026
  • Trump Claims US Would Benefit Without USMCA Agreement

    June 17, 2026

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Maya Jama flaunts her taut midriff in a white crop top and denim jeans during holiday as she shares New York pub crawl story

    April 5, 2025
  • 2

    Saar-Unternehmen hoffen auf tiefgreifende Reformen

    March 26, 2025
  • 3

    Marta Daddato: vita e racconti tra YouTube e podcast

    April 7, 2025
  • 4

    Unlocking Success: Why the FPÖ Could Outperform Projections and Transform Austria’s Political Landscape

    April 26, 2025
  • 5

    Mecimapro Apologizes for DAY6 Concert Chaos: Understanding the Controversy

    May 6, 2025

Follow Me

Follow Me
  • Cookie Policy
  • CORRECTIONS POLICY
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF SERVICE

Hosted by Byohosting – Most Recommended Web Hosting – for complains, abuse, advertising contact: o f f i c e @byohosting.com


Back To Top
Newsy Today
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World