Tag:

dugaan suap

News

KPK: Bupati Pati Tersangka Korupsi Dana DJKA

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Bupati Pati Under Scrutiny: Corruption Allegations and Public Outcry

The political landscape in Pati, Central Java, is currently turbulent. Bupati (Regent) Sudewo faces a storm of controversy, battling allegations of corruption tied to railway projects and dealing with significant public discontent over tax hikes. What does this signify for the future of regional governance and anti-corruption efforts in Indonesia?

KPK Investigates Bupati Sudewo’s Alleged Involvement in Railway Corruption

The Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK), Indonesia’s anti-corruption commission, has confirmed that Sudewo, a former member of the DPR RI (House of Representatives) and current Bupati of Pati, is under investigation for allegedly receiving funds from corruption related to railway projects in Central Java. Budi Prasetyo, a KPK spokesperson, stated that the investigation into alleged bribery related to the procurement of goods and services at the Directorate General of Railways (DJKA) of the Ministry of Transportation is ongoing.

Reportedly, the KPK previously seized Rp3 billion from Sudewo in connection with this case. The details emerged during the trial of Putu Sumarjaya, Head of the Central Java Railway Engineering Center (BTP), and Bernard Hasibuan, a Commitment Making Officer at BTP Central Java, at the Semarang Corruption Court in November 2023, where Sudewo testified as a witness.

While Sudewo claims the seized money came from his salary as a DPR member and business ventures, the KPK is not letting go. Budi Prasetyo emphasized that investigators will delve into the facts presented in court and that returning funds does not absolve someone of criminal charges. This case highlights the persistent challenges in combating corruption within infrastructure projects and the crucial role of the KPK in holding public officials accountable.

Did you know? Infrastructure projects are particularly vulnerable to corruption due to their complexity and the large sums of money involved. Increased transparency and independent oversight are crucial for mitigating this risk.

Public Protests Erupt Over Tax Hikes and Demands for Resignation

Adding fuel to the fire, residents of Pati have staged large-scale demonstrations demanding Sudewo’s resignation. The catalyst for these protests was a controversial decision to increase the Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan (PBB), or Land and Building Tax, by up to 250%. While Sudewo initially challenged protestors to demonstrate, he later reversed the tax hike and apologized for his remarks. However, the damage was done, and the protests continue, reflecting deep-seated dissatisfaction among the populace.

The DPRD (Regional People’s Representative Council) of Pati has even formed a special committee to investigate the calls for Sudewo’s impeachment, demonstrating the seriousness of the situation and the potential political fallout.

The Interplay of Corruption Allegations and Public Trust

The combination of corruption allegations and unpopular policy decisions has created a perfect storm for Bupati Sudewo. This case illustrates the critical importance of public trust in governance. When officials are suspected of corruption, it erodes public confidence and makes it difficult to implement even necessary policies effectively.

Pro Tip: Local governments should prioritize transparency and community engagement in policy-making processes to build trust and avoid public backlash.

Future Trends in Anti-Corruption and Regional Governance

The situation in Pati provides insights into several future trends:

Increased Scrutiny of Regional Officials

Expect greater scrutiny of regional officials by both the KPK and the public. Social media and citizen journalism are empowering citizens to hold their leaders accountable. The KPK’s efforts to decentralize its operations and collaborate with local law enforcement will also contribute to increased oversight.

The Rise of Data-Driven Anti-Corruption Measures

Data analytics and technology are playing an increasingly important role in detecting and preventing corruption. Tools for monitoring government spending, identifying suspicious transactions, and analyzing procurement data are becoming more sophisticated and widely adopted. According to a 2023 report by Transparency International, countries that effectively utilize data-driven anti-corruption strategies tend to score higher on the Corruption Perception Index.

Focus on Good Governance and Transparency

There will be a growing emphasis on good governance principles, including transparency, accountability, and participatory decision-making. Local governments that prioritize these principles will be better positioned to attract investment, foster economic growth, and maintain public trust. Consider the example of Surabaya, which has implemented e-government systems to improve transparency and reduce opportunities for corruption. Learn more about e-governance best practices.

Citizen Empowerment and Participation

Citizens are demanding a greater voice in how they are governed. Local governments need to create channels for meaningful public participation, such as town hall meetings, online forums, and citizen advisory boards. This can help build trust, improve policy outcomes, and reduce the risk of corruption.

Reader Question: What are some specific steps that local governments can take to improve transparency in procurement processes?

FAQ: Corruption and Governance in Indonesia

What is the KPK’s role?
The KPK is Indonesia’s anti-corruption commission, responsible for investigating and prosecuting corruption cases.
Why are infrastructure projects vulnerable to corruption?
Their complexity and large budgets offer opportunities for bribery, kickbacks, and embezzlement.
What is the PBB?
PBB stands for Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan, or Land and Building Tax.
How can citizens fight corruption?
By reporting suspected corruption, participating in public forums, and demanding transparency from their leaders.

The situation in Pati serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges in combating corruption and promoting good governance in Indonesia. The future requires increased vigilance, stronger institutions, and a more engaged citizenry.

What are your thoughts on the Bupati Pati situation? Share your comments below, and explore more articles on related topics on our website. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay updated on the latest developments in Indonesian politics and governance.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Kubu Hasto’s Bold Protest Against Riezky Aprilia in MPD Sidang: Unraveling the Dynamics and Implications

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Unpacking Legal and Political Accountability

As political landscapes evolve, so do the mechanisms for holding leaders accountable. In recent years, there has been a focus on ensuring that political figures are answerable to the law, fostering transparency in governance. For instance, the prosecution of a high-ranking official like Hasto Kristiyanto in Indonesia raises important discussions around legal frameworks and their effectiveness in combating corruption. This case underscores the need for robust legal systems that can withstand political pressures.

Case Study: Legal Challenges in Political Reforms

One significant challenge is securing evidence lawfully. In high-profile corruption cases, the admissibility of evidence like secretly recorded conversations often comes under scrutiny. For example, cases in countries with active anti-corruption agencies, such as Indonesia, demonstrate the intricacies involved in ensuring such evidence is collected and presented without violating privacy laws. This emphasizes the delicate balance between combating corruption and upholding lawful due process.

Digital Surveillance: The Double-Edged Sword

With technological advancements, digital surveillance has become a key tool in anti-corruption efforts. However, it also presents ethical dilemmas. Modern legal frameworks, such as updates to the Indonesian KPK Law, increasingly require oversight from monitoring bodies like the Dewan Pengawas KPK to approve surveillance activities. Such measures are critical to ensure surveillance does not infringe on civil liberties.

Pro Tip: Balancing Surveillance and Privacy

For organizations and governments implementing digital surveillance, establishing clear guidelines and accountability mechanisms can help balance effective monitoring with personal privacy rights. Regular audits and transparency reports can foster public trust in anti-corruption efforts.

Maintaining Public Trust in Governance

Public trust is paramount for effective governance. Transparency in the legal process and a clear demonstration of accountability help build confidence among citizens. For instance, public broadcasts of trials and court decisions can enhance transparency and keep constituents informed.

Recent examples, such as increased public access to information through reforms in Brazil and India, demonstrate ongoing efforts to bolster trust in political institutions globally. By involving civil society and media watchdogs, governments can work towards a more transparent system.

FAQs on Political Accountability and Anti-Corruption

What are the main challenges in prosecuting political figures?

– Securing admissible evidence while respecting privacy laws
– Overcoming potential political interference in the justice system

How does digital surveillance aid anti-corruption?

– Surveillance can reveal illicit activities and support investigations
– Proper oversight is essential to prevent misuse and protect privacy

Why is public trust important?

– Trust in governance ensures public support for legal and political processes
– Enhances democratic stability and legitimacy

Call to Action

Engage in the discourse on political accountability and anti-corruption by exploring more articles on our site. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest insights and developments in governance and legal reforms.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Effendi Simbolon Reveals: Jokowi’s Actions Have Unexpectedly Aided Hasto

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Former PDIP Member Defends Jokowi: ‘He Helped Hasto, Not Interfered’ as KPK Indicts PDIP Secretary-General

Article:

In a surprising turn of events, former PDIP cadre Effendi Simbolon has come to the defense of former Indonesian President Joko Widodo (Jokowi), stating that he believes there’s no involvement of the latter in the legal troubles faced by PDIP Secretary-General Hasto Kristiyanto. Instead, Effendi asserted that Jokowi actually provided assistance to Hasto during his tenure as president.

Effendi, speaking at an event held at the Ministry of Infrastructure and Regional Development in Jakarta on Wednesday (8/1/2025), was initially asked about the alleged politicization of the case involving Hasto. However, he chose to bring Jokowi into the conversation, stating, "No, to my knowledge, in fact, Mr. Jokowi has helped him, as far as I know."

Hasto’s status as a suspect was recently announced by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) during the tenure of the new leadership, a period in which Jokowi is no longer serving as president. The announcement was made by KPK Chairman Setyo Budiyanto on December 24, 2024.

Effendi pointed out that Hasto’s status as a suspect only emerged during the new leadership’s period, suggesting that the previous leadership had not pursued the case. "The proof is, until the period of the previous leadership, there was no such thing. This is a new period," Effendi explained.

When pressed again about Jokowi’s role in protecting Hasto, Effendi only spoke about the attention the former president had given to the PDIP secretary-general. "It means that he, politically, has actually given attention, there has never been anything like what is being accused," Effendi said.

Effendi also revealed that he had personally informed Hasto about Jokowi’s support. "I also told Mr. Hasto, ‘Mr., to my knowledge, Mr. Jokowi is the one who is helping you.’ ‘Oh, no, this is…’," Effendi recounted.

Expressing concern over the legal troubles faced by PDIP, Effendi suggested that PDIP Chairperson Megawati Soekarnoputri should also bear responsibility. He argued that, according to the Law on Political Parties, the party’s leadership should be held accountable to the public.

"Because this is fatal, all leadership should also resign. The party is not owned by an individual, it is regulated by the Law on Political Parties, so it should also be accountable to the public," Effendi said.

Hasto Kristiyanto, the current PDIP secretary-general, is currently a suspect in the KPK’s investigation into the alleged bribery of the time extension for the position of Harun Masiku, a former election official. He is also a suspect in the obstruction of justice case, allegedly instructing his phone and Harun Masiku’s phone to be submerged and ordering Harun Masiku to flee.

Read more about Jokowi’s involvement in the aftermath of Hasto’s indictment on the next page.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Senior KPK Investigator Proposes to Seal Wahyu’s Testimony to Prevent Hasty Decisions

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Breaking: Ex-KPU Commissioner Wahyu Setiawan’s Testimony Cited as Key in Unraveling PDIP‘s Hasto Kristiyanto‘s Graft Case

Jakarta – Former KPU commissioner Wahyu Setiawan’s (WS) impending testimony has been billed as a potential game-changer in the burgeoning graft case involving PDIP’s Secretary General Hasto Kristiyanto. The ex-prosecutor from the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), Yudi Purnomo, believes that WS’s account will shed new light on the case, which centers around bribery in the parliamentary seat replacement (PAW) dispute involving Harun Masiku, fondly known as ‘Harun Buron.’

"We believe that Wahyu Setiawan’s testimony will clarify this messy case that has made Hasto Kristiyanto a suspect," wrote Yudi in a statement on Friday (3/1/2025). He believes that the crucial aspects of WS’s testimony need to be locked down to prevent Hasto from squirming out of the situation.

Yudi asserted, "The prosecution aims to pin down vital information from Wahyu’s testimony, ensuring that Hasto won’t have the chance to wriggle out of this." He maintains that Wahyu, as the recipient of the bribe, holds crucial knowledge about the money and all parties involved.

Wahyu was initially slated for questioning on Thursday (2/1). However, he requested a rescheduling for next Monday (6/1). KDNEws contacted KPK spokesperson Tessa Mahardhika, who confirmed the rescheduling due to an unforeseen commitment. Tessa hopes that WS will provide accurate information during his testimony.

In other developments, the KPK has officially named Hasto Kristiyanto as a suspect in the PAW graft case involving Wahyu Setiawan. His alleged involvement includes attempting to secure Harun Masiku’s parliamentary seat through a shady PAW maneuver, blocking the inauguration of the rightful winner Riezky Aprilia, and thwarting the investigation by instructing the destruction of evidence. Harun Masiku remains at large.

The Holder of Democracy (KDP) party has strongly condemned the involvement of PDIP’s top brass in this sordid affair. They called on the KPK to thoroughly investigate this case and ensure that no stone is left unturned. As the nation awaits WS’s testimony, one thing is clear: the PAW graft case is far from over.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Indonesian Anticorruption Commission Urged to Reschedule Audit in Hasto’s Case

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Breaking: Ex-KPU Commissioner Skips KPK Summons in Major PAW Bribery Case

Jakarta, Indonesia – Former KPU Commissioner, Wahyu Setiawan (WS), failed to appear for his scheduled KPK interrogation today regarding the bribery case involving PDI Perjuangan Secretary-General, Hasto Kristiyanto, and the manipulation of parliamentary election results.

WS requested a rescheduling to next Monday (January 6, 2025), citing an unavoidable personal commitment. "We’ve received information from the investigating authorities asking to reschedule the interrogation," said KPK spokesman, Tessa Mahardhika, in a press conference at the KPK headquarters in Jakarta.

Tessa expressed hope that WS would provide accurate information about the case. "We hope that WS can provide truthful information," he said. However, WS assured through his legal representative that he would appear at the rescheduled interrogation.

Earlier, KPK started summoning witnesses in the high-profile bribery case involving Hasto Kristiyanto as the main suspect. Today’s interrogation was set for WS, who served as a KPU commissioner from 2017 to 2022.

Hasto Officially Named a Suspect

On December 24, 2024, KPK officially announced that HastoKristiyanto was named a suspect in the case. He is accused of bribing former KPU Commissioner WS to manipulate election results, allowing Harun Masiku to enter the parliament through a by-election (PAW).

KPK chairman, Setyo Budiyanto, explained that Hasto was attempting to replace Riezky Aprilia, the rightful PAW candidate, with Harun Masiku. Hasto reportedly requested a fatwa from a local religious leader and even intercepted Riezky’s appointment letter.

In addition to the bribery charges, Hasto is also accused of obstruction of justice. He allegedly ordered the immersion of his own phone and that of Harun Masiku, and instructed the latter to go into hiding. Harun Masiku remains at large.

The investigation into this case continues.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

PDIP Official in Soroti Implicated, KPK: Room for Discussion

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

PDIP Denies Involvement of Hasto Kristiyanto in Harun Masiku Bribery Case, KPK Stands by Evidence

In a recent development, the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP) has vehemently denied any involvement of its Secretary General, Hasto Kristiyanto, in the Harun Masiku bribery case. The party asserts that there is no concrete evidence linking Kristiyanto to the case, echoing sentiments shared by party officials during a press conference held after Kristiyanto was named a suspect in the case.

The party’s stance was echoed by Tessa Mahardhika, the spokesperson for the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), who acknowledged the Party’s opinion but maintained that the commission’s stance is firm and based on strong evidence. Mahardhika stated, "KPK appreciates all opinions and criticisms, but we will not engage in political discourse. In the realm of law, we have robust evidence."

Meanwhile, PDIP’S Secretary General, Ronny Talapessy, reinforced the party’s position, stating, "The bribery case against Harun Masiku has been finalized in court and is legally binding. All convicts have already served their sentences, including those involved in the case."

Talapessy also highlighted that after evaluating all evidence presented during the trials, from the Court of Corruption to the cassation level, no concrete evidence linked Hasto Kristiyanto to the case. He emphasized, "No evidence has been presented to tie our party’s Secretary General to the Wahyu Setiawan bribery case or the Harun Masiku case that has already been settled."

In response to PDIP’s claims, KPK has stuck to its stance, insisting that it has substantial evidence to support its case against Kristiyanto. The commission has further invited all parties to wait for the upcoming trial to evaluate the strength of the evidence presented.

This developing story underscores the intricate interaction between politics and law in Indonesia, where high-ranking officials are often under public scrutiny. As the trial progresses, Indonesian citizens eagerly await further developments in this case.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

“Accused of Political Meddling: Respect the Legal Process

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Rise in Political Tensions: Gerindra‘s Maruarar Backs KPK, PDIP Alleges Politicization

Jakarta, Indonesia – Maruarar Sirait, a high-profile politician from the Great Indonesia Movement Party (Gerindra), has responded to the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) naming PDIP’s secretary-general, Hasto Kristiyanto, as a suspect in a case involving former General Elections Commission (KPU) commissioner, Wahyu Setiawan. Maruarar emphasized the importance of respecting the legal process.

Maruarar, also known as ‘Ara’,stated, "I believe we should respect the legal process," during an interview at his residence in the Menteng area of Jakarta. He reiterated Indonesia’s status as a nation of laws, stressing the importance of allowing legal processes to run their course.

Regarding the ongoing ‘Capture Harun Masiku’ challenge, Maruarar expressed confidence that the nation could apprehend the legendary criminal. "If anyone can capture him, then certainly, this nation can apprehend Harun Masiku," he said.

PDIP spokesman, Chico Hakim, however, has accused certain parties of attempting to disrupt and sink PDIP’s reputation regarding Hasto’s nomination as a suspect. "There’s a strong political motivation in this case," Chico told reporters. "The fact that two suspects in the BI CSR case were initially cleared is evidence of that. There’s a clear effort to hinder PDI Perjuangan and even take it over."

KPK, meanwhile, dismissed allegations of politicization, insisting that Hasto’s nomination as a suspect was purely a matter of law enforcement. "The decision to name Hasto a suspect is solely based on legal considerations," said KPK chairman Setyo Budiyanto at a press conference in Jakarta.

The political landscape remains tense as Indonesia prepares for the upcoming PDIP Congress, with both parties keeping a close eye on developments and any potential disruptions. The nation awaits further updates on this evolving story.

aliases/whn

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

PDIP’s Role in KPK’s Efforts to Deter Yasonna from Going Abroad: Obscure Reasons

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Title: PDIP Spokesperson Questions KPK‘s Arrest as Yasonna Laoly Restricted from Leaving Indonesia

Jakarta, CNN Indonesia — PDIP spokesperson Guntur Romli has expressed doubts about the reasons given by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) for preventing former Minister of Law and Human Rights Yasonna Laoly from leaving Indonesia. Romli suspects that the KPK might be unjustly targeting PDI Perjuangan officials, as the reasons provided by the commission have been vague and inconsistent.

Romli, who serves as the party’s spokesperson, pointed out that PDI Perjuangan secretary general Hasto Kristianto has also been a target of the KPK, allegedly due to his decision to place Torajan candidate Harun Masiku on the electoral list in South Sumatra. He questioned whether the KPK was acting on orders to attack the PDI Perjuangan.

He raised concerns about the prioritization of the Harun Masiku case, with the KPK showing aggression in handling it while other cases, potentially causing billions in losses to the state, remain unaddressed. Romli mentioned the Blok Medan case and a corruption report against President Jokowi’s family filed by Ubaidilah Badrun, both of which have not seen any updates from the KPK.

KPK spokesperson Tessa Mahardhika Sugiarto confirmed that the travel ban against Yasonna and Hasto was issued by KPK investigators on Tuesday (24/12). The ban is aimed at facilitating the investigation into a case of bribery involving candidates for the 2019-2024 Regional Representative Council (DPD) elections. Yasonna had been questioned as a witness in the case on Wednesday (18/12).

Yasonna had stated that he was asked about a letter requesting a fatwa from the Supreme Court (MA) regarding the replacement of Harun Masiku’s candidacy through the mechanism of a time swap (PAW). The KPK’s decision to ban Yasonna and Hasto from leaving the country will remain in effect for six months.

cnn/rob

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

PDIP Endorses KPK’s Decision to Name Jokowi a Suspect, Urges Respect for Legal Process

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

President Jokowi Reacts to PDIP Secretary-General’s Status as Suspect in Graft Case

In a recent development, Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) has named PDIP Secretary-General, Hasto Kristiyanto, as a suspect in a corruption case involving former KPU commissioner, Wahyu Setiawan. While no longer in office, President Joko Widodo (Jokowi) has found himself entangled in the case, with his name still being mentioned in relation to Hasto’s status.

"I respect the ongoing legal process," said Jokowi during an event at the Graha Saba Buana building in Solo, Central Java, on Wednesday (25/12/2024). When asked about his name being connected to the case, Jokowi responded calmly, stating that he is no longer in office.

KPK announced Hasto as a suspect in the case involving alleged bribery of Wahyu Setiawan during a press conference at their headquarters in South Jakarta on Tuesday (24/12). KPK chairman Setyo Budiyanto explained that Hasto played a role in placing Harun Masiku in the South Sumatra I electoral district and attempting to secure his position in the DPR via a Patent of Appointment (PAW). Hasto even reportedly hindered Riezky Aprilia’s planned installation as an MP by withholding her invitation letter.

The DPP PDI-P’s deputy chairman, Rony Talapessy, has suggested that Hasto’s naming as a suspect is politically motivated. He stated that the true reason behind Hasto’s involvement is his party’s stance against attempts to undermine democracy and the constitution, as well as abuse of power during the final stages of Jokowi’s presidency.

Although no longer in office, Jokowi maintains that he has no issue with his name being linked to the case. "It’s fine if my name is involved in this case," he said, emphasizing that he is retired now.

(afn/afn)

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"StatementStorm: PDIP’s Stance After High-Ranking Member Named Suspect by KPK"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

PDIP Reacts to Hasto’s Ternaksa Status, Megawati’s Statement Confirmed

Jakarta, Dec 24th 2024 – The PDIP party swiftly held a press conference following the KPK‘s (Corruption Eradication Commission) designation of its Secretary-General, Hasto Kristiyanto, as a suspect in an alleged bribery case involving a former KPU (General Election Commission) commissioner, Wahyu Setiawan.

The press conference was held at the PDIP Central Executive Board’s (CEB) office in Jakarta on Tuesday (24/12/2024) evening. PDIP’s CEB Chairman, Ronny Talapessy, along with other party leaders, addressed the media.

PDIP’s Key Statements:

  1. Legal Status: PDIP asserts that the bribery case has concluded in court and is legally binding, with the convicted parties having served their sentences. PDIP claims that no evidence connects Hasto to the case.

  2. "Diawut-awut" Confirmation: PDIP believes the designation of Hasto as a suspect validates Megawati Soekarnoputri’s statement from earlier this month, in which she mentioned that PDIP would face disorder (Diawut-awut) regarding its VI Congress.

  3. Political Interference: PDIP views this legal development as political interference and forced prosecution. They contend that the case aims to gain public sympathy through the premature release of confidential documents.

  4. Cooperation and Previous Statements: PDIP reassures the public that Hasto will cooperate fully with the KPK. They point out that Megawati had previously hinted at Hasto’s impending designation as a suspect in a podcast hosted by Akbar Faisal.

  5. Presidential and Party Issues: Ronny implies that Hasto’s designation as a suspect is retaliation for PDIP’s stance against democratic erosion during President Joko Widodo’s tenure and its recent decision to expel members suspected of undermining democracy. He expresses regret over the premature disclosure of confidential documents.

  6. Megawati’s Statement and Congress: PDIP interprets Megawati’s previous statement of PDIP facing disorder (Diawut-awut) as a warning about potential disruption during the VI Congress.

  7. Hasto’s Cooperation: PDIP confirms that Hasto will fully cooperate with the KPK’s investigation. No new evidence linking Hasto to the case has been presented, according to Ronny.

  8. KPK’s Allegations: The KPK alleges that Hasto played a crucial role in the bribery case, facilitating the placement of Harun Masiku as a legislative candidate in South Sumatra, despite him being from South Sulawesi. This allegedly allowed Masiku to amass votes and replace the late Nazarudin Kiemas as a PDIP representative in the DPR. The KPK claims that Hasto actively frustrated Rizky Aprilia’s candidacy.

PDIP maintains that Hasto’s actions rested on his commitment to party principles and democracy, not criminal intent. The party extends its full support to Hasto as he faces these allegations.

Keywords: PDIP, Hasto Kristiyanto, KPK, Wahyu Setiawan, Megawati Soekarnoputri, Politics, Bribery

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts