Media figure Ngizwe Mlando Mchunu has issued a formal, unconditional public apology and retraction to Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) President Julius Malema. This development follows two binding court orders issued in May 2026, which required Mchunu to legally address a series of highly inflammatory and defamatory remarks made against the political leader.
In a statement released on Thursday, Mchunu confirmed that he sought legal counsel and now fully understands the legal implications of the court directives. He has committed to refraining from publishing similar statements in the future and has formally withdrawn all defamatory remarks made both before and after the court orders were issued.
Addressing the Allegations
The retraction addresses several severe and unfounded claims Mchunu previously leveled against the EFF leader. These include accusations that Malema received 60 million from Nigerian drug dealers and illegal foreigners, as well as claims that he looted the collapsed VBS Mutual Bank and misappropriated funds in Ekurhuleni and through On Point Engineering.
Beyond the financial allegations, Mchunu’s prior commentary included personal insults, such as referring to Malema as a “political devil,” a “dead snake,” and a “dog.” During an interview in Johannesburg on April 30, Mchunu had further challenged the politician to confront him at his location in Nkandla and stated that Malema “must go to jail.”
Potential Implications
With the issuance of this formal retraction, the legal pressure on Mchunu regarding these specific comments will subside, provided he adheres to the court’s prohibition on repeating the claims. Supporters of Mchunu may now face a period of adjustment as he calls upon them to accept his decision to comply with the legal requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the apology from Ngizwe Mlando Mchunu?
The apology follows two binding court orders handed down in May 2026 that required Mchunu to answer for defamatory remarks made against Julius Malema.
What specific claims were retracted?
Mchunu retracted claims that Malema received 60 million from illegal foreigners and Nigerian drug dealers, as well as accusations regarding the looting of VBS Mutual Bank and the misappropriation of funds in Ekurhuleni and On Point Engineering.
What was the court’s ruling regarding these statements?
The North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria ruled that the statements were defamatory and prohibited Mchunu from repeating the allegations in any manner, including explicitly or impliedly.
How do you view the role of the judiciary in curbing inflammatory rhetoric in public discourse?