Tag:

pengadilan tipikor jakarta pusat

News

Budi Said Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison for 1.1-Ton Gold Corruption Case

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Surabaya‘s ‘Crazy Rich’ Budi Said Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison for ₹1.1 Trillion Emas Scam

In a landmark verdict, Crazy Rich Surabaya, Budi Said, has been sentenced to 15 years in prison for his role in a ₹1.1 trillion (IDR 165.1 trillion) gold heist involving state-owned miner PT Antam. The ruling was delivered at the Central Jakarta Corruption Court on Friday, December 27, 2024.

Budi Said was found guilty of manipulating the sale and purchase of 1.1 tons of gold belonging to PT Antam, causing significant losses to the state. The court also convicted him of money laundering.

The judge handed down the following ruling:

  • 15 years imprisonment, with an option to pay a fine of ₹1 billion (IDR 15.2 billion). If the fine is not paid, he faces an additional six months imprisonment.
  • Budi Said is ordered to pay ₹35.078 billion (IDR 5.154 trillion) to the state as compensation, representing 58.135 kg of gold. If unpaid within one month after the verdict, his assets will be seized and auctioned off.

The judge found Budi Said guilty under Articles 2 and 18 of the Corruption Eradication Law, along with Article 55(1)k of the Criminal Code and Article 64(1) of the Criminal Code, as well as Article 3 of Law No. 8/2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes.

This sentence is less severe than the prosecution’s earlier demand of 16 years imprisonment, a ₹1 billion fine, and ₹1.1 trillion in compensation.

Watch Video: Budi Said Faced 16 Years in Prison over ₹1.1 Trillion Gold Scam

Source: (amw/haf)

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Prosecutor Criticizes 6.5-Year Sentence for Bui Harvey Moeis: Too Lenient!

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Jakarta – Justice Served, But Critics Seek Harsher Punishment in $300B Timah Corruption Case

The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) has filed an appeal against the verdict issued to business tycoon Harvey Moeis and four other defendants, arguing that the sentencing was too lenient in a massive corruption case involving state-owned mining company PT Timah Tbk.

Harvey Moeis, along with Suwito Gunawan, Robert Indiarto, Reza Andriansyah, and Suparta, were convicted for their role in a $300 billion corruption case involving the illegal trading of tungsten ore, a byproduct of tin mining, between 2015 and 2022.

"The reason for the appeal is that the sentences given to the five defendants were too mild," said Sutikno, Director of Special Crimes Division at the AGO. "There’s an imbalance in the sentencing, with the punishments not reflecting the severity of their crimes."

The AGO believes that the court failed to consider the broader impact of the defendants’ actions on society, particularly in the Bangka Belitung Islands, where the illegal activities occurred.

Harvey Moeis, the mastermind behind the scheme, was initially sentenced to six years and six months in prison. However, the prosecution had sought a 12-year prison term. Other defendants received sentences ranging from five to eight years, considerably lower than the prosecution’s demands.

"I believe the court only considered the personal roles of the defendants in this case, but they failed to factor in the significant damage caused to the community and the state," Sutikno said in an interview with reporters.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Harsh Sentence of 6.5 Years Sparks Widespread Criticism for Harvey Moeis

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Harvey Moeis’ 6.5-Year Prison Sentence Sparks Outrage; Critics Demand Harsher Punishment

Jakarta – Harvey Moeis’ 6.5-year imprisonment in the timah corruption case has drawn sharp criticism from various quarters. The court’s decision, considered lenient by many, is at odds with the prosecution’s demand for 12 years. The magnitude of the corruption case, which caused an Rp 300 trillion loss to the state, has further fueled public frustration.

The defendant was also fined Rp 1 billion, with an alternative sentence of six months in prison if unpaid. Moreover, Moeis must pay Rp 210 billion in asset replacement, with his properties to be seized and auctioned off if he fails to do so. The high court’s decision has been met with a chorus of disapproval.

"This verdict is a slap in the face of justice. How can a Rp 300 trillion loss be equated to just 6.5 years in prison?" said Hinca Panjaitan, a member of the DPR-RI‘s Commission III, summing up the sentiment shared by many.

Charles Simabura, director of the Constitutional Studies Center at Andalas University’s Faculty of Law (Pusako Unand), echoed the same sentiment. "This leniency in sentencing is counterproductive to the fight against corruption. It’s high time our judicial system starts dishing out harsher punishments for such grave crimes."

Rudianto Lallo, an(III)ance member of the DPR-RI from the NasDem fraction, concurred. "The sentences should have been maximized to serve as a deterrent. Moreover, the focus should be on recovering the assets, not just imposing fines."

The case, which involved the illegal extraction and export of timah from Bangka-Belitung islands, has had devastating consequences. It has led to environmental destruction, loss of livelihood for local communities, and a massive dent in state coffers.

Many critics argue that the court’s decision fails to reflect the gravity of the crimes committed. They demand stiffer penalties to uphold justice and deter future corruption.

Story developing…

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Stiff Sentence of 6.5 Years for Harvey Moises Sparks Public Outcry

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Title: Broad Outcry Against lenient 6.5-Year Sentence for Harvey Moeis in $300B Timah Corruption Case

Harvey Moeis, a key figure in a colossal corusption case involving the state-owned miner PT Timah, received a controversial 6.5-year prison sentence, drawing heavy criticism from various sectors of society. The massive embezzlement resulted in a staggering loss of Rp300 trillions ($22.5 billion) for the nation.

The Trial and Verdict

The Central Jakarta Corruption Court sentenced Harvey Moeis to 6 years and 6 months in prison for his role in the case, along with a Rp1 billion fine and an order to pay Rp210 billion in restitution. The verdict was significantly lower than the 12-year prison sentence demanded by the prosecution.

Presiding judge Eko Aryanto stated that Harvey Moeis had been found guilty of corruption and money laundering beyond a reasonable doubt. However, the lenient sentence has sparked widespread outrage and disbelief.

Political Figures’ Criticism

  • Hinca Panjaitan, Demokrat Party’s Deputy Chairman: "How can a Rp300 trillion loss to the nation be equated to just 6.5 years in prison?"
  • Charles Simabura, Constitutional Law Expert: "This sentence further weakens corruption fight in Indonesia. We expect the prosecution to appeal this decision."
  • Rudianto Lallo, NasDem Party’s Representative: "The sentence does not set a strong enough example. The penalty should have been maximized to serve as a deterrent."

Read More on Next Page:

Harvey Moeis’ Influence and Connections

The impact of Harvey Moeis’ ties to prominent figures and the unexpected leniency in his sentence on Indonesia’s corruption battle

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Director-General of Customs Summoned Over Alleged Corruption Involving Former Banjarmasin Regent

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

KPK Summons Official in Connection to Case Involving Former Kutai Kartanegara Regent

The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has summoned Rizal (RZ), the Director of Enforcement and Investigation at the Directorate General of Customs and Excise, Ministry of Finance, as a witness in the case of alleged money laundering involving the former regent of Kutai Kartanegara, Rita Widyasari.

KPK spokesperson Tessa Mahardhika confirmed the news on Monday (23/12/2024), stating that RZ was summoned as a witness in the case against Rita, who is currently a suspect in the money laundering investigation. However, Mahardhika did not disclose whether RZ had already responded to the summon or the specific questions he would be asked.

The witness summon takes place at KPK’s headquarters, the Red and White Building, on Jl. Kuningan Persada, according to Mahardhika.

Rita initially faced charges of bribery and gratification in 2017, later standing trial and being convicted for gratification. In 2018, she was sentenced to 10 years in prison, fined Rp 600 million, and banned from holding political office for 5 years. The Central Jakarta Corruption Court found Rita guilty of accepting Rp 110 billion in bribes related to permits for a project in Kutai Kartanegara.

Rita attempted to appeal the verdict but was unsuccessful. The Supreme Court rejected her appeal for case review in 2021, and she has since begun serving her sentence at Pondok Bambu Prison.

Besides the gratification case, Rita remains a suspect in the money laundering case. In July 2024, KPK revealed that Rita had also received bribes from mining companies. Directer of KPK’s Investigation Unit Asep Guntur Rahayu disclosed that Rita received USD 5 for every metric ton of coal provided by a company.

Stay tuned for more updates on this ongoing case.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Ensuring Long-Term Efficiency: Four to Eight-Year Bui Contracts for PT Timah’s 3 Bos Smelters

Or, for a shorter version:

PT Timah’s 3 Bos Smelters: Long-Term Bui Contracts Spell Efficiency

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Heads Roll: Three Smelter Chiefs Get 4-8 Years for Rp 3T Timah Corruption

Jakarta – Aそれともtribunal at the Jakarta Corruption Court has read out the verdict, sentencing three top bosses of private smelters to 4-8 years in prison for a corruption case involving the misuse of around Rp 300 trillion in state funds related to the management of tin. The convicts are Suwito Gunawan, Robert Indarto, and Rosalina, holding key positions in PT Stanindo Inti Perkasa, PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa, and PT Tinindo Internusa respectively.

Stiff Penalties and Fines

  • Suwito was sentenced to 8 years imprisonment and fined Rp 1 billion, or face 6 months in jail. He was also ordered to pay a replacement fine of Rp 2.2 trillion, or face 6 years imprisonment.
  • Robert got an 8-year prison term and a Rp 1 billion fine, or 6 months in jail. He was also ordered to pay Rp 1 trillion as a replacement fine, or face 6 years imprisonment.
  • Rosalina received a 4-year prison term and a Rp 750 million fine, or 6 months in jail.

Money Laundering and Corruption Charges

The court found Suwito and Robert guilty of money laundering, violating articles 2, 18, and 55 of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Law, and articles 3 and 55 of Law Number 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering. Rosalina was found guilty of violating articles 2 and 18 of the KPK Law, and article 55 of the Indonesian Criminal Code.

Lesson Learned

The corruption bust underscores the importance of maintaining transparency and accountability in the mining industry. This verdict sets a precedence that corruption will not be tolerated, and those found guilty will face severe consequences.

This is a developing story. mehr details will be provided as they become available. (whn/haf)

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Harvey Dent Sentenced to 6.5 Years in Prison

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Indonesian Magnate PT Timah Dirut, Dwiocar Jaksa – Bangkapos.com”>Harvey Moeis Sentenced to 6.5 Years in Prison for $30 Billion Tin Corruption

Article:

Indonesian tycoon Harvey Moeis was sentenced to 6 years and 6 months in prison by the Jakarta Corruption Court on Monday (December 23, 2024), for his role in a massive corruption scandal involving the trading of tin, resulting in a staggering loss of IDR 300 trillion ($30 billion) to the state.

The presiding judge, Eko Aryanto, read out the verdict, stating, "Harvey Moeis has been proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt of committing corruption and money laundering." Alongside the prison sentence, Moeis was also ordered to pay a fine of IDR 1 billion, replaceable with 6 months of imprisonment if unpaid.

Moeis, who represented PT Refined Bangka Tin in the joint venture with PT Timah, was additionally ordered to pay IDR 210 billion in restitution. Failing this, his properties will be seized and auctioned to recover losses, with any shortfall met with additional imprisonment.

The court ruled that the aggravating factors against Moeis included his actions hindering the government’s anti-corruption efforts, while mitigating factors deemed relevant were his lack of previous convictions, proper conduct during trial, and family obligations.

Harvey Moeis was found guilty of violating Articles 2 and 18 of the Corruption Eradication Commission’s Law (UU Tipikor), along with Article 55(1) subsection a of the Criminal Code (KUHP), and Article 3 of Law No. 8/2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of the Criminal Act of Moneylaundering.

The prosecution had initially sought a 12-year prison term and the same fines for Moeis, alleging that his actions had caused significant state losses. The case was among Indonesia‘s largest corruption scandals, with Moeis and other co-defendants accused of manipulating tin trade agreements during the administration of former State-Owned Enterprises Minister Rini Soemarno.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

The Hero’s Jubilee: A Feast of Sensation and Illusion

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Jakarta: Harvey Moeis’ Defense in Timah Corruption Case Lacks Substance, Claims Prosecutor

In a dramatic turn at the Jakarta Corruption Court, prosecutors struck back against the defense presented by Harvey Moeis, the main defendant in the Timah commodities corruption case. Prosecutor Silvi criticized Harvey’s plea, deeming it lacking in substance and filled with sensationalism.

Starting off, Silvi dismissed Harvey’s suggestion that he was being framed and used as a scapegoat. "The defense’s claim that the defendant and his family have been framed and are merely a pawn in this case is incorrect and baseless," Silvi stated.

Silvi lamented the lack of substance in Harvey’s defense, which he said was laden with sensationalism and illusions. "It’s unfortunate that the defendant’s plea lacks substance but is full of sensationalism and the defendant’s illusions," Silvi commented.

From the start of the trial, Silvi observed that Harvey did not show any remorse. Instead, Silvi alleged, Harvey positioned himself as a victim. "From the start to the end of the trial, there has not been any apology from the defendant for being involved in and part of the corruption crime in this case. Instead, the defendant always positions himself as a victim," Silvi explained.

Going further, Silvi argued that Harvey’s claims of philanthropy and heroism were unsupported by evidence. Harvey had claimed to donate Rp 15 billion for ICU ward construction in a public hospital, assist with a cash-strapped pregnant woman’s delivery costs, and distribute COVID equipment to the public. However, Silvi noted that none of these claims were backed by evidence.

The prosecutor concluded, "Thus, it seems that the defendant portrays himself as a hero and philanthropist, but sadly, his claims lack evidence."

Read more on the next page…

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts