The European Union views Western Balkans enlargement as a strategic investment in its own security following the outbreak of war in Ukraine. According to Biserka Benicheva, a career diplomat and Director of European Affairs at PanEuropa Bulgaria, regional instability in neighboring areas directly threatens the stability and security of the entire Union.
Why has EU enlargement become a security priority?
The geopolitical landscape shifted significantly after 2022. While the Western Balkans experienced a period of stagnation following 2008, the EU’s decision to grant candidate status to Ukraine and Moldova accelerated the conversation around integration. This shift has created what Benicheva describes as “muted dissatisfaction” among Western Balkan nations.
These countries are requesting a similar acceleration in their own accession processes. They point to the fact that even nations facing ongoing conflict or undefined borders are moving forward. The perception is that the timeline for the Balkans should not be slower than that of Eastern European neighbors currently facing active wars.
How do Montenegro and Serbia compare in the accession race?
Progress across the region is uneven, with different nations operating on different tracks. Benicheva identifies Montenegro as the country making the fastest progress in negotiations. A working group is already established to prepare Montenegro’s accession treaty, signaling a concrete move toward membership.
In contrast, Serbia remains the most influential heavyweight in the Balkan region but faces significant hurdles. Since 2021, Serbian negotiations have stalled. To regain momentum, Benicheva notes that Serbia must fulfill specific requirements, including:
- Ensuring freedom of the media.
- Implementing comprehensive judicial reforms.
- Upholding the rule of law.
The expectation is that once one Balkan nation successfully advances, it will create a motivational effect, proving to others that EU membership is a tangible reality rather than a distant prospect.
What hurdles face North Macedonia’s accession?
Negotiations for North Macedonia are currently at a standstill. According to Benicheva, this pause stems from what she calls a “non-constructive position” from local authorities. The European Commission and the European Parliament have reported that the country is lagging behind on necessary reforms.
A central requirement for starting negotiations involves the constitutional rights of Bulgarians in North Macedonia. Benicheva observes that this message often fails to resonate locally due to internal political pressures. Instead of accepting the condition, leaders often attempt to bypass or redefine the terms, a strategy she suggests is rarely successful in the long term.
She compares this to Bulgaria’s own history, noting that the country had to accept unpopular conditions—such as the closure of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant units—to secure its membership. In both cases, the deciding factor remains the political will of the sitting government.
Can EU integration prevent separatism in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
The path for Bosnia and Herzegovina is complex, requiring the fulfillment of 12 specific conditions before negotiations can officially open. However, the potential benefits of integration extend beyond mere economics.
Benicheva suggests that opening negotiations with the federation could serve as a tool to counter separatist forces within the country. By bringing the entire state into the negotiation process, the EU can effectively stabilize internal divisions through the prospect of unified membership.
Regional security and the role of Albania
Albania has emerged as another advanced player in the region. Beyond its progress toward the EU, Albania is working to align its legislation and has even signaled cooperation with Serbia regarding the EU single market. Additionally, Albania is joining a military alliance alongside Kosovo and Croatia, a move Benicheva links to the protection of minority rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is the Western Balkans enlargement important for EU security?
The EU views enlargement as a way to prevent regional instability from spreading, which could directly threaten the security and stability of all member states.
Which Balkan country is closest to EU membership?
Based on current negotiation speeds and the establishment of treaty working groups, Montenegro is currently the fastest-moving candidate.
What are the main obstacles for Serbia?
Serbia needs to address issues regarding media freedom, judicial reform, and the rule of law to overcome its current stagnation.
What do you think about the EU’s current expansion strategy? Should the Balkans be prioritized to ensure security, or should reform requirements remain the absolute focus? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for more geopolitical analysis.
Worth a look