A new report challenges the assertion that asylum seekers are widely exploiting the UK’s modern slavery system. The findings, from the centre-right thinktank Bright Blue, suggest that claims of abuse have been overstated by successive Home Secretaries.
Report Questions Claims of Widespread Abuse
Bright Blue’s report found limited evidence to support claims that asylum seekers are falsely identifying as victims of modern slavery to remain in the country. This contradicts statements made by multiple Home Secretaries who have suggested such claims hinder deportation efforts. The current Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, has also accused asylum seekers of making “vexatious, last-minute claims,” particularly after a recent High Court decision blocked the deportation of an Eritrean man who alleged he was a victim of trafficking.
The number of referrals to the modern slavery system has increased significantly since its inception, rising from just over 3,000 in 2015 to more than 19,000 last year. Despite this increase, the report indicates that the vast majority of referrals – 90% – are assessed as having reasonable grounds for classification as victims of modern slavery.
Limited Impact of Proposed Reforms
The Bright Blue report also casts doubt on the potential effectiveness of proposed changes to the modern slavery rules. Home Secretary Mahmood is expected to outline her proposals early next year, but the report suggests these changes may not significantly reduce the number of asylum claims. The authors propose a shift towards earlier detection of modern slavery, which they believe could address the limited amount of abuse that does occur.
It’s important to note that a modern slavery classification does not automatically grant leave to remain in the UK. The report states that it more often results in compensation and only temporary permission to stay. Furthermore, asylum seekers cannot self-refer for assessment; referrals must come from third-party organizations.
What Could Happen Next
If the government adopts the report’s recommendations, we could see increased training for Border Force and Home Office personnel to better identify victims of modern slavery. It is also possible that ministers may consider banning referrals from individuals already in detention who have been assessed by these organizations. However, the Home Office has indicated it intends to proceed with reforms aimed at identifying vulnerable people and preventing misuse of the system, suggesting a continued focus on tightening the rules around modern slavery claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What nationalities are most commonly referred for modern slavery assessments?
British nationals make up the largest group being evaluated for modern-day slavery, followed by people from Albania, Vietnam and Eritrea.
Can an asylum seeker directly request a modern slavery assessment?
No, an asylum seeker can only be referred for assessment by third-party organizations, with 97% of claims coming via public bodies such as Border Force, police authorities, local authorities and the Home Office itself.
What does the Home Office say about the rising number of modern slavery referrals?
A Home Office spokesperson stated that the rising number of referrals is the reason for announced reforms, intended to identify vulnerable people and stop misuse of the system, and to make Britain a less attractive destination for illegal migrants.
Given these findings, how might a more nuanced understanding of modern slavery claims impact the broader debate surrounding asylum policy?
