A dispute between two neighbors over a pet dog in a Ghaziabad apartment elevator escalated into a physical altercation on September 12, prompting local police to register a case against one of the women, according to police statements released on Monday.
Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP) Nandgram, Ziauddin Ahmad, stated that the confrontation occurred around 3 pm at a high-rise apartment complex where both women reside on the same floor. The complainant, a schoolteacher, was returning home and attempted to board the elevator when another resident already inside with a dog objected to her entry.
According to the police report reviewed by authorities, the situation quickly turned violent inside the lift. The schoolteacher stated in her complaint that the other woman pushed her out, struck her with a cane, and verbally abused her while threatening to unleash the dog.
“When I tried to enter the lift, she started pushing me out of the lift. When I did not exit the lift, she hit me with a cane. Then I snatched the cane from her, and she slapped me. She also verbally abused me. She also threatened that she would unleash her dog on me,” the teacher stated in her official complaint.
Surveillance footage from the elevator captured the altercation. The video, which went viral on social media on Monday, shows the woman with the dog striking the teacher with a cane. Security guards and bystanders later intervened near the elevator door to attempt to pacify the two residents. After the doors closed again, the footage shows the woman with the dog slapping the teacher, who retaliated.
Did You Know? The case was registered at the Nandgram police station under sections 115(2) for voluntarily causing hurt and 352 for intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
Police Charges and Legal Classification
The Nandgram police station formally registered the case on September 12 following the teacher’s complaint. Both statutory sections applied in the case—section 115(2) and section 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita—are classified as non-cognisable offenses.
https://x.com/htTweets/status/2099470643507208249
Under Indian law, non-cognisable offenses mean that police cannot initiate independent investigations or execute arrests against a suspect without obtaining a specific court order. ACP Ahmad confirmed that the recorded CCTV clip will be incorporated into the ongoing official inquiry and that appropriate action will follow.
Next Steps in the Investigation
As the police investigation continues, authorities are analyzing the elevator’s CCTV footage to verify the sequence of events detailed in the complaint. Because the report is non-cognisable, further legal proceedings and potential investigative steps depend on directives from the local court.
Investigators will review the statements provided by the schoolteacher alongside the video evidence to determine subsequent actions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Both residents continue to reside on the same floor of the high-rise complex while the inquiry proceeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
What sparked the altercation between the two neighbors?
The dispute began when a schoolteacher attempted to enter an apartment elevator where another resident was already standing with a pet dog and objected to anyone else boarding.
What legal charges were filed by the police?
Police registered a case under sections 115(2) for voluntarily causing hurt and 352 for intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
Can the police arrest the suspect immediately?
No. Because both applied sections are non-cognisable, police cannot initiate formal investigations or make arrests without a prior court order.
How do residential elevator disputes of this nature impact community safety and neighborly relations in high-rise complexes?
Keep reading