Heritage Foundation calls on US to prioritize marriage and family in new report

The Heritage Foundation is calling for a renewed focus on strengthening the “American family,” launching a series of policy recommendations as the midterm election year begins. The proposals range from “marriage bootcamp” programs for cohabitating couples to a “universal day of rest” modeled on existing blue laws.

A Shift in Focus

The plan, published Thursday, represents a broadening of the foundation’s traditional focus on limited government, positioning it as a key voice on domestic issues within the populist right. During President Donald Trump’s second term, Heritage demonstrated its influence through Project 2025, a comprehensive blueprint for overhauling U.S. policy. The foundation’s authors contend that, “except for radically redefining the institution, marriage is not currently a federal priority.”

Did You Know? The Heritage Foundation’s plan calls for a review of all federal grants, contracts, and policies to assess their impact on marriage and family formation.

Among the recommendations is a discouragement of online dating, citing research suggesting couples who meet online are less likely to marry. The report also suggests tax codes should not penalize marriage and that education policies should not encourage young people to delay starting families.

Controversial Past and Current Alignment

Last year, Heritage President Kevin Roberts defended conservative commentator Tucker Carlson’s interview with Nick Fuentes, a figure known for antisemitic views, sparking significant controversy and leading to resignations within the organization. This incident highlighted internal divisions and external criticism regarding the foundation’s direction.

Currently, Vice President JD Vance has publicly supported Heritage’s vision, praising the organization as a leading source of conservative ideas. He has also proposed policies aimed at supporting families, such as allowing parents to vote on behalf of their children and offering low-interest loans to married couples.

Expert Insight: This report signals a clear intention to inject social and cultural issues directly into the political debate, moving beyond traditional economic and foreign policy concerns. The emphasis on marriage and family formation reflects a desire to appeal to a specific segment of the electorate and potentially shape the policy agenda of a future administration.

IVF and the Role of Government

The report addresses in vitro fertilization (IVF), acknowledging its benefits but arguing against its use outside of marriage. This stance comes after a period of debate surrounding IVF access, particularly following a ruling in Alabama that temporarily threatened the practice. Despite this, President Trump signed an executive order in his second term aimed at reducing the costs of IVF treatment.

The Heritage Foundation’s recommendations call for a significant role for the federal government in shaping family policy, requesting that Trump issue executive orders to evaluate the impact of all federal actions on marriage and family formation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core argument of the Heritage Foundation’s report?

The report argues that the federal government should actively work to “save and restore the American family” by implementing policies that encourage marriage and discourage alternatives, believing this will strengthen society.

What specific policies are being proposed?

The proposals include “marriage bootcamp” programs, a “universal day of rest,” discouraging online dating, and reviewing all federal policies to ensure they support traditional family structures.

What was the controversy surrounding Heritage President Kevin Roberts last year?

Kevin Roberts defended Tucker Carlson’s interview with Nick Fuentes, a figure known for antisemitic views, which led to outrage and resignations from within the Heritage Foundation.

As the Heritage Foundation pushes these proposals, will they gain traction in the broader political landscape, and how might they influence the upcoming election cycle?

Leave a Comment