Advocates Say Democrats Can Strip US-Israel Funding From NDAA

WASHINGTON — On Thursday in Washington, D.C., advocates said Democrats are uniquely positioned after the midterm elections to strip a controversial measure from a Pentagon funding bill that would codify the integration of U.S. and Israeli military industries.

Democratic leadership had already opposed the Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) earlier this year. The sprawling $1.15 trillion package includes funding for President Donald Trump’s military wishlist, such as the Golden Dome missile shield and the Trump-class battleship plan.

Top party officials, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, attached their opposition to the Trump administration’s war with Iran and wider affordability issues facing U.S. citizens. Advocates argue that leadership must also state that U.S.–Israeli defense production integration is not acceptable.

Section 219 of the current Senate version calls for the creation of a United States–Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative. The measure would expand and accelerate bilateral defense technology research, development, testing, evaluation, coordination, and industrial cooperation.

Opposition to Pentagon Funding Grows

Opposition to Pentagon funding has historically been politically fraught, with lawmakers wary of appearing unsupportive of the U.S. military.

Advocates Say Democrats Can Strip US-Israel Funding From NDAA
Photo: The Times of Israel

Lawmakers now face a December 11 deadline when current stopgap funding ends. Congress must pass another stopgap measure or the full NDAA to maintain Pentagon funding.

Republicans face a ticking clock before Democrats take control of both chambers of Congress in January.

Did You Know? The current Senate version of the NDAA includes Section 219, which establishes the United States–Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative to accelerate bilateral military research and industrial cooperation.

Diverging Views Among Democratic Leadership

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries called for dramatic change in the Middle East, reiterating his support for a two-state solution during a press briefing on Thursday. Jeffries said that the status quo is unacceptable regarding Gaza, the West Bank, and the expiring $3.8 billion annual Memorandum of Understanding on military aid to Israel, according to reporting by The Jerusalem Post.

Advocates Say Democrats Can Strip US-Israel Funding From NDAA
Photo: i24NEWS

Jeffries stopped short of endorsing Senator Chris Van Hollen’s initiative to remove the disputed NDAA provisions.

Growing Senate Pushback Against Section 219

A total of 12 senators have signed a new letter calling for the removal of the defense cooperation provisions. The signatories now include progressive figures like Bernie Sanders alongside more centrist lawmakers such as Ron Wyden and Tammy Duckworth.

In their letter, the senators wrote that the provision would expand technology sharing and co-production across domains like biotechnology, quantum systems, and artificial intelligence. They warned that this integration could exceed NATO allies and threaten U.S. security interests by giving Israel control over American weapons systems.

Advocates Say Democrats Can Strip US-Israel Funding From NDAA
Photo: The Jerusalem Post

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Section 219 of the NDAA?

Section 219 of the Senate defense bill calls for the creation of a United States–Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative to expand bilateral defense technology research, development, and industrial cooperation.

When does current congressional stopgap funding expire?

Current stopgap funding is scheduled to end on December 11, requiring lawmakers to pass either another stopgap measure or the full NDAA to keep the Pentagon funded.

How many senators signed the letter opposing the provisions?

A total of 12 senators signed the letter opposing the defense technology integration provisions, including Senator Chris Van Hollen and Bernie Sanders.

How will congressional leadership reconcile caucus opposition to Section 219 with the fast-approaching December 11 funding deadline?