The scheduled indictment hearing for urban artist Stiven Mesa Londoño, known as Blessd, was suspended on June 9 after the presiding judge reported health issues. The proceedings, which address allegations of aggravated extortionate kidnapping, remain stalled as the judiciary works to reschedule the session, according to legal representative Sebastián Gutiérrez. This delay adds to a series of procedural hurdles involving multiple jurisdictions in Medellín.
Why was the indictment hearing for Blessd postponed?
The hearing was suspended due to the presiding judge’s sudden medical leave, as reported by the secretary of the 20th Municipal Criminal Court with functions of guarantee control. Initially, the case was assigned to the 17th Municipal Criminal Court, but that office could not proceed due to scheduling conflicts and prior commitments. According to attorney Sebastián Gutiérrez, who represents the alleged victim in the 2022 case, the lack of judicial availability has caused significant frustration in the legal process. Gutiérrez has publicly requested that the justice administration ensure permanent availability for guarantee control judges to prevent further delays in these high-profile proceedings.
The Colombian judicial system utilizes “guarantee control” judges to ensure that constitutional rights are protected during the pre-trial phase of criminal investigations, particularly when serious charges like extortion are involved.
What are the allegations against the artist?
The Fiscalía General de la Nación summoned Blessd, his manager Santiago Jaramillo Morán (known as “Dímelo Jara”), and two others to an indictment hearing regarding a 2022 incident. The complainant, Andrés Felipe Sánchez—an imitator known for his work on Yo Me Llamo—alleges he was held against his will at a recording studio in the La Frontera sector. Sánchez claims he was threatened and pressured to sign a contract after performing as an imitator of the artist. The investigation was recently reactivated following a ruling from the Superior Tribunal of Medellín, which ordered authorities to move forward with the case.
How has the defense responded to the claims?
Blessd and his legal team, the firm Arango ||| Tres Palacios, have consistently denied the allegations. In a public statement, the artist acknowledged that a meeting took place on June 1, 2022, but denied his personal presence. He characterized the accusations as an attempt by Sánchez to generate social media traffic at the expense of his reputation. The defense maintains that the legal dispute arose because Sánchez allegedly promoted events using the artist’s identity without authorization. Lawyers for the artist have stated they intend to prove his innocence in court, rejecting the characterization of the events as criminal.
Are there other similar legal challenges?
Beyond the 2022 case, Blessd faces separate allegations involving Iván Andrés Galindo Navia, the representative for the singer Pirlo. Galindo claims he and his team were assaulted and held captive on May 21, 2024, at a property in the Alto de Las Palmas sector. In a sworn statement provided to the Fiscalía on February 11, 2025, Galindo alleged that he was forced to undress and surrender mobile devices after being accused of stealing jewelry from the artist. The artist’s attorney, Luis Ángel López, has dismissed these claims as “false,” arguing that the version of events provided by the accuser has changed multiple times throughout the investigation.
When following criminal proceedings involving public figures, monitor official reports from the Fiscalía General de la Nación rather than social media speculation to ensure you are receiving verified, accurate information.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is an indictment hearing? It is the formal session where the prosecution presents evidence and officially notifies the accused of the charges they face.
- Has Blessd been convicted? No. As of now, the artist is in the preliminary stages of the legal process and maintains his innocence.
- Who is representing the artist? The firm Arango ||| Tres Palacios is leading the defense for the artist and his manager.
- Why was the hearing moved between courts? The case was transferred from the 17th Municipal Criminal Court to the 20th due to internal scheduling conflicts and resource availability.
Stay informed on the latest developments regarding this case and other legal news in the entertainment industry. Subscribe to our newsletter for verified updates as they happen.
