China’s People’s Liberation Army Navy test-fired a long-range ballistic missile into the South Pacific on Monday. Launched from a nuclear-powered submarine at 12:01 p.m. local time, the missile carried a dummy warhead. The event drew immediate protests from Australia, Japan, and New Zealand over regional stability and transparency.
JL-3 Capabilities and the South Pacific Nuclear-Free Zone
The projectile used in Monday’s test was reportedly a new JL-3 submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM), according to The Guardian. These missiles can carry multiple warheads, each capable of delivering a nuclear payload to different targets. With an estimated range of 10,000km, the JL-3 allows China to strike distant targets while operating from nuclear-powered submarines in the South China Sea.
Beijing’s naval expansion is accelerating. China currently operates six of these submarines, and The Guardian reports that the Bohai shipyards can likely produce six more per year, with a second shipyard in Shanghai also constructing nuclear-powered vessels.
The launch site created immediate legal and diplomatic friction. New Zealand officials noted the missile was fired into the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone, established by the 1986 Treaty of Rarotonga. While China ratified the protocols in 1987, pledging not to test nuclear weapons in the zone, the use of a dummy warhead allowed Beijing to maintain that it complied with international law.
Diplomatic Friction: Australia, Japan, and New Zealand
Regional allies criticized the timing and lack of transparency surrounding the launch. Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong described the test as destabilizing for the region, noting it occurs amid a rapid military buildup by China.
The timing was particularly pointed: Monday was the same day Australia and Fiji signed a new mutual defense treaty intended to counter Chinese influence in the Pacific. Fiji becomes Australia’s fourth formal treaty ally, joining the U.S., New Zealand, and Papua New Guinea.
Japan and New Zealand expressed similar alarm over the short notice provided by Beijing.
- New Zealand: Foreign Minister Winston Peters told The Associated Press that China carried out the test within hours of informing the government.
“Australia has been clear with China that we regard this as destabilizing to the region,”
Penny Wong, Australian Foreign Minister
Strategic Signaling and U.S. Reaction
The U.S. State Department monitored the launch of the unarmed missile. Spokesperson Tommy Pigott stated that while the U.S. works to prevent nuclear proliferation, Beijing is doing the opposite through an opaque nuclear weapons buildup. The U.S. continues to urge China to commit to regularized notification arrangements for intercontinental-range launches, consistent with other P5 members.
Analysts suggest the test is less about routine training and more about projecting superpower status. Lyle Morris, a senior fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute’s Center for China Analysis, noted that this was the first publicly acknowledged test with a dummy warhead from a Chinese nuclear-powered submarine to travel this far into the Pacific, as reported by The Associated Press.
This launch follows a pattern of increasing military assertiveness. In 2024, China fired an intercontinental ballistic missile into the Pacific for the first time since 1980. That move mirrored U.S. testing protocols and was viewed by experts as a signal of China’s growing global reach.
The ‘Weishe’ Strategy: Coercion Through Force
Beyond the technical specifications of the JL-3, the test fits into a broader Chinese military doctrine known as weishe, or coercion. Under Xi Jinping, this strategy has expanded to shape the Indo-Pacific region and preserve what Beijing calls its period of strategic opportunities.
The missile test coincides with other aggressive naval postures. The Guardian highlights a Chinese naval task group’s circumnavigation of Australia last year, which included live-fire exercises and the harassment of Australian patrol aircraft and naval personnel. These actions are aimed at pressuring Australia to cease legal passage operations in international waters, which would strengthen China’s claims in the South China Sea.
Beijing has dismissed these concerns, urging other nations to avoid overinterpretation. The Chinese foreign ministry maintains the launch was a routine part of annual training and not directed at any specific country.
Timeline of Pacific Missile Escalation
| Year | Event | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | Previous ICBM Test | Last Pacific test before the 2024 gap. |
| 1986-87 | Treaty of Rarotonga | Establishment of South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone; China ratifies. |
| 2024 | First Modern ICBM Test | First Pacific test in over four decades; dummy warhead used. |
| Last Year | Australian Circumnavigation | Chinese naval task group conducts live-fire exercises around Australia. |
| Monday | JL-3 SLBM Test | Nuclear-powered sub launch into South Pacific; coincides with Fiji-Australia treaty. |
The immediate future for the region involves a heightened state of alert. With the “Joint Sea-2026” exercises currently underway between China and Russia in the port of Qingdao, as reported by CBS News, the South Pacific has become a primary theater for China to demonstrate its ability to strike thousands of kilometers from its shores.
Find more reporting in our World section.