Indonesian comedian Daus Mini filed an official police report at the Polda Metro Jaya after an unauthorized social media account misused his identity and altered his name to “Dayus Mini,” according to statements recorded by local authorities.
Legal Actions and Statute Applications Under the ITE Law
According to legal counsel Zecky Alatas, the formal complaint utilizes specific provisions within Indonesia’s Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE) Law. The legal team formally filed the report citing Pasal 51 ayat (1) juncto Pasal 35 ayat (1) Undang-Undang ITE, with potential expansions depending on the results of the ongoing police investigation. Before escalating the matter to law enforcement, representatives attempted direct digital interventions. Zecky Alatas noted that legal team members entered the offending profile to issue direct warnings, but the account operator ignored the notices and treated the warnings as a joke.
Real-World Harassment and Financial Impacts
According to Daus Mini, the digital impersonation campaign quickly translated into physical harassment and financial harm during public appearances. The comedian stated that onlookers pointed at him in public spaces while confusing his identity with the fraudulent profile. Furthermore, the incident triggered a noticeable decline in digital revenue. Daus reported that live-streaming session earnings and virtual gift distributions dropped significantly compared to previous broadcasts, causing direct material losses alongside reputational damage. Beyond identity theft, the account operator also sent direct messages containing threats and body shaming remarks, prompting plans for separate legal filings.
Pro Tip: Document all digital harassment immediately by capturing clear screenshots of direct messages, profile handles, and transaction histories before filing formal reports with cybercrime units.
Platform Compliance and Informal Warning Failures
Daus Mini stated that friends and colleagues attempted to resolve the issue informally by asking the account holder to issue a public apology and clarify the situation. Despite multiple requests to cease the activity, the individual refused to comply and continued broadcasting live streams using the unauthorized name and stolen photographs. Daus emphasized that while minor imitation has occurred in the past, this specific incident represents an escalation in severity that required formal judicial intervention rather than casual resolution.
Did You Know? Digital impersonation laws frequently incorporate specific clauses for electronic manipulation and identity falsification under regional cybercrime frameworks.
Frequently Asked Questions
What specific charges were filed in the Daus Mini impersonation case?
According to attorney Zecky Alatas, the legal team filed the report under Pasal 51 ayat (1) juncto Pasal 35 ayat (1) Undang-Undang ITE at the Polda Metro Jaya.
How did the fake social media account alter the comedian’s identity?
According to Daus Mini, the unauthorized profile used his actual photographs while modifying his name slightly to ‘Dayus Mini’.
What secondary offenses accompanied the identity theft?
According to Daus Mini, the account operator also sent direct messages containing explicit threats and body shaming remarks.
What tangible impacts did the impersonation cause?
According to the artist, the incident led to public pointing incidents at event venues, emotional stress, and a noticeable drop in live-streaming gift revenues.
What are your thoughts on strengthening digital identity protections across social media platforms? Share your perspective in the comments below, explore our related coverage on cyber law enforcement, or subscribe to our newsletter for updates.
Keep reading