Facial attractiveness correlates with mortality risk, according to a long-term study using high school yearbook photographs from 1957. Researchers found that individuals in the lowest facial attractiveness group faced a 16.8% higher mortality risk than those in middle-tier groups, though the most attractive participants held no distinct survival advantage, la.lv reported.
Wisconsin High School Cohort Tracked Across Decades
The study analyzed data from 8,386 individuals who graduated from high schools in Wisconsin in 1957. Researchers tracked these participants across decades until their deaths or the conclusion of the study period in 2022. To determine facial attractiveness, independent raters evaluated participant photographs from their 1957 high school yearbooks. These evaluations allowed researchers to divide participants into six distinct groups ranging from least attractive to most attractive.
Investigators then compared these groupings against mortality records obtained from the US National Death Index up to 2022. The resulting data showed a distinct divide. Participants assigned to the lowest attractiveness group experienced a mortality risk 16.8% higher than the four middle groups. Conversely, individuals in the highest attractiveness tier demonstrated mortality risks that did not significantly differ from participants with average facial ratings.
Life Expectancy Variations Among Men and Women
Researchers applied life expectancy table methods to estimate how these statistical risks translate into potential years of life. For women who fell into the lowest attractiveness group at age 20, the projected life expectancy was nearly two years shorter than that of remaining female participants. Among men, the disparity was smaller, with those in the lowest attractiveness category showing an expected lifespan nearly one year shorter at age 20.
Study authors emphasized that these figures do not serve as individual health predictions. The findings reflect statistical associations observed across a large population sample rather than a definitive timeline for any single person.
Researchers adjusted analysis for auxiliary variables
To test whether external circumstances drove the findings, researchers adjusted their analysis to account for a wide array of auxiliary variables. High school academic performance, intellectual capacity, family background, adult income, and physical and mental health status during midlife were all integrated into the statistical models.
Even after controlling for these factors, the statistical link between the lowest attractiveness ratings and elevated mortality risk persisted. Investigators suggest that facial appearance may serve as an indicator for underlying biological traits connected to health, or may reflect broader behavioral patterns regarding personal well-being and lifestyle habits.
Independent raters evaluated yearbook photographs
How were the facial photographs evaluated for the study?
Independent raters assessed participant photographs taken from 1957 high school yearbooks in Wisconsin. Based on these evaluations, researchers sorted the 8,386 participants into six groups ranging from least attractive to most attractive before cross-referencing the data with the US National Death Index through 2022.
Does the study prove that being conventionally attractive leads to a longer life?
The elevated mortality risk was isolated to participants in the lowest attractiveness group.
Did the researchers account for socioeconomic and health differences?
The association between the lowest attractiveness tier and increased mortality risk remained present even after accounting for these variables.
Worth a look