Analogue black holes allow scientists to observe Hawking radiation—the theoretical emission of particles from a black hole’s event horizon—by simulating curved spacetime in laboratory settings. According to research published in Nature and Physical Review Letters, these “analogue” systems use fluids, light, and superconducting chips to mimic the physics of general relativity, providing the only current means to test Stephen Hawking’s 1974 predictions.
How do analogue black holes work?
Researchers create a “sonic” or “optical” event horizon by making a medium move faster than the waves traveling through it. In a fiber-optical analog, as described by Philbin et al. in Science (2008), a laser pulse creates a horizon where light cannot escape. This mimics the gravitational pull of a real black hole without requiring a collapsed star.
The physics relies on the “analogue gravity” framework detailed by Barcelo, Liberati, and Visser in Living Reviews in Relativity (2005). By manipulating the speed of sound in a Bose-Einstein condensate or the speed of light in a nonlinear fiber, scientists can study how quantum fields behave near a horizon. This allows them to observe “stimulated” radiation—where an input signal triggers an emission—and “spontaneous” radiation, which is the true thermal Hawking effect.
What are the latest breakthroughs in Hawking radiation observation?
Recent experiments have moved from theoretical models to direct observation. In 2019, Munoz de Nova et al. reported the observation of thermal Hawking radiation and its temperature in an analogue black hole, published in Nature. This was a critical step in verifying that the radiation follows the specific thermal spectrum Hawking predicted.
Other researchers have focused on “stimulated” emission. Drori et al. (2019) used an optical analogue to observe stimulated Hawking radiation in Physical Review Letters. More recently, Felipe-Elizarraras et al. reported the measurement of analogue Hawking radiation stimulated by a single photon in Nature Communications (2026), pushing the precision of these measurements to the quantum limit.
Comparing Simulation Mediums
Different laboratories use different “fluids” to simulate spacetime. The choice of medium changes what the researchers can measure:
- Optical Fibers: Used by Webb et al. (2014) and Philbin et al. (2008) to study nonlinear optics and event horizons via light pulses.
- Superconducting Chips: Shi et al. (2023) utilized an on-chip superconducting black hole to simulate curved spacetime and Hawking radiation in Nature Communications.
- Quantum Vortices: Svancara et al. (2024) used a giant quantum vortex to find signatures of rotating curved spacetime, as detailed in Nature.
- Hydrodynamic Flows: Nguyen et al. (2015) created an acoustic black hole using microcavity polaritons.
Why does “backreaction” matter for the future of physics?
A major unsolved mystery is the “information paradox,” discussed by Leonard Susskind in Scientific American (1997). If a black hole evaporates completely, what happens to the information that fell into it? To solve this, scientists are studying “backreaction”—how the emission of Hawking radiation affects the black hole itself.
According to Patrick, Gooding, and Weinfurtner in Physical Review Letters (2021), measuring backreaction in an analogue system provides a glimpse into how a real black hole might shrink over time. This is supported by earlier work on acoustic black holes by Balbinot et al. (2005) in Physical Review D, which explored the quantum effects of this feedback loop.
What happens next in quantum gravity research?
The trend is moving toward “quantum field simulators.” Viermann et al. (2022) described a quantum field simulator for dynamics in curved spacetime in Nature, suggesting that we can now build “toy models” of the early universe. This allows researchers to test theories of quantum gravity—the elusive “theory of everything”—without needing a telescope.
Future experiments are likely to focus on “white-black hole pairs.” Agullo, Brady, and Kranas (2022) have already begun exploring the quantum aspects of stimulated radiation in these pairs via Physical Review Letters, which could reveal how matter and energy behave at the very edge of existence.
Frequently Asked Questions
No. Real black holes are too far away and their Hawking radiation is too faint to detect with current telescopes. That is why scientists use “analogue” systems in labs.
According to researchers like Philbin et al., it is a boundary created by a laser pulse in a fiber where the pulse’s speed prevents other light waves from overtaking it, mimicking a gravitational horizon.
Jacob Bekenstein published the foundational work on black holes and entropy in Physical Review D in 1973, shortly before Hawking’s radiation paper.
Want to dive deeper into the quantum world? Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on analogue gravity and quantum simulations, or leave a comment below with your thoughts on the information paradox.












