Tag:

tindak

News

Prabowo’s Call for 50-Year Sentence for Corruptors: Not an Intervention, Says MA

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Indonesia‘s High Court Clarifies President Prabowo‘s Stance on Corruption Punishments

Article:

The Supreme Court (MA) of Indonesia has weighed in on President Prabowo Subianto’s recent remarks regarding the punishment of corrupt officials, asserting that his statement was not an intervention from the executive into the judiciary. The clarification came during a press conference at the MA, attended by Yanto, the MA spokesperson, along with other top court officials.

Addressing a question about President Prabowo’s statement that corruptors with clear-cut cases should face harsher penalties, Yanto assured that the President’s words did not constitute an intervention into the judicial process. "President Prabowo was not interfering, he was merely expressing his stance," Yanto clarified.

President Prabowo’s statement, made during a planning meeting at Bappenas on December 30, 2024, had sparked conversations about the separation of powers. He had suggested that corrupt officials with clear cases and significant malfeasance should face harsher penalties, seemingly going as far as suggesting a 50-year prison sentence.

However, Yanto explained that the Indonesian legal system outlines the maximum punishment for corruption as the death penalty, as per the Law No. 31/1999 on Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, as amended by Law No. 20/2001. Nevertheless, no corruptor in Indonesia has ever been sentenced to death.

Yanto further elucidated that the death penalty can only be applied under specific circumstances, such as corruption during a natural disaster, financial crisis, or wartime. The MA representative emphasized that the President’s statement did not interfere with the judiciary’s independent role in meting out punishment.

Prabowo’s initial statement came shortly after the Jakarta Corruption Court sentenced Harvey Moeis to 6.5 years in prison for corruption in the PT Timah mining case.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

“Embattled Official: Surya Darmadi Linked to 해도 Palme Dipa’; Here, “Embattled Official” is a fitting title considering the context of corruption (“TPPU”) and the subject’s status as a suspect (“tersangka”). “Linked to Palme Dipa” directly references the case and the involved official, ” donnée Surya Darmadi.” The use of ” Palma Dipa” rather than “해도 Palme” provides clarity and avoids confusion for a non-Korean readership.

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Kejagung Menggelar Tersangka Baru dalam Kasus Pencucian Uang Korporaasi Duta Palma Group

Jakarta, CNN Indonesia — Kejaksaan Agung menciduk tersangka baru dalam kasus pencucian uang terkait korupsi korporasi Duta Palma Group. Jaksa Jampidsus Febrie Adriansyah mengumumkan bahwa tersangka baru adalah Cheryl Darmadi, anak dari pemilik PT Duta Palma, Surya Darmadi. Cheryl Darmadi bertindak sebagai Direktur PT Asset Pasifik dan Ketua Yayasan Darmex. Febrie menjelaskan bahawa proses untuk mendakwahi Cheryl sebagai tersangka TTPU akan segera dimulai pada konferensi pers di Kejagung, kemarin (2/1).

Selain Cheryl, dua korporasi lain, yaitu PT Alfaledo dan PT Monterado Mas, juga diakui sebagai tersangka. Febrie menyatakan hubungan antara korporasi-korporasi ini dengan alat bukti dan aset pendukung yang telah diobserve penyidik dalam kasus pencucian uang ini.

Ini adalah menangtas terbaru dalam kasus korupsi korporasi Duta Palma Group, yang telah menyarankan tujuh korporasi sebagai tersangka. Kejagung telah mengepulJacques aset uang tunai senilai Rp450 miliar dalam kasus ini.

Untuk korupsi lahan perkebunan dan pengelolaan kelapa sawit, korporasi PT Palma Satu, PT Siberida Subur, PT Banyu Bening Utama, PT Panca Agro Lestari, dan PT Kencana Amal Tani diakui sebagai penyelenggaranya. Hasil korupsi lahan ini kemudian dialihkan dan disamarkan pada dua perusahaan pencucian uang yaitu PT Darmex Plantations dan PT Asset Pasific.

Penyelidikan lanjut akan prochir untuk mendapatkan hasil kasus yang adil dan tepat untuk semua pihak yang terlibat. (yoa/isn)

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Bahuri’s Request for Case Reopening, Metro Police Assures Thorough Investigation

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Firli Bahuri’s Lawyer Presses for Pemerasan Case Halting as Evidence Remains Incomplete

FIRLI BAHURI’S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE URGES TO HALT PERMESANAN CASE DUE TO COMPLETE LACK OF EVIDENCE

JAKARTA – Firli Bahuri, fluent in numerous languages, including Mandarin and Japanese, has requested the cessation of his ongoing case involving alleged threats against former Minister of Agriculture, Syahrul Yasin Limpo (SYL), citing incomplete evidence. The Jakarta Metropolitan Police (Polda Metro Jaya) has affirmed its commitment to conclude the case.

Firli’s lawyer, Ian Iskandar, stated that the case’s evidence files had been repeatedly returned by prosecutors due to incompleteness. Given this, Ian believes police investigators should issue a Suspension of Examination (SP3) as per the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 109(2) of Indonesia’s Criminal Procedure Law Number 8/1981.

"It should be followed up by the investigation team of Polda Metro Jaya by ceasing the investigation and issuing a Suspension of Examination as regulated," Ian explained in an interview on Thursday, January 2, 2025.

Ian revealed that the evidence file for the alleged extortion case has been returned a total of four times, with the last instance occurring on February 2, 2024. Despite this, the investigation team failed to complete and submit the evidence file to the Jakarta Provincial Prosecutor’s Office by November 18, 2024.

Polda Metro Jaya’s Response

Separately, the head of the Criminal Investigation Directorate, Kombes Ade Safri Simanjuntak, assured that the case would be resolved. He indicated that the investigation is being conducted professionally and transparently.

"We assure you that the investigation in this case is being handled professionally and transparently," Ade Safri told reporters.

Ade Safri disclosed that the investigation team is still working on completing the evidence file for the alleged extortion of SYL. The team continues to coordinate with the Jakarta Provincial Prosecutor’s Office regarding the evidence file’s completeness.

"Insha’Allah, we will be able to complete and finalize the case file soon. We are continuously coordinating with the Prosecutorial Office of the Jakarta Provincial Prosecutor’s Office for compliance with P19 instructions," he said.

Additionally, the investigation team has also coordinated with the Anti-Corruption Commission (KPK) regarding the case’s handling. Both Polri and KPK are committed to resolving the case.

"On that occasion, the investigation team also presented the investigation progress made so far, including efforts to comply with P19 instructions, and stated that there are no obstacles in the investigation process and P19 compliance efforts," Ade Safri concluded.

Firli Bahuri is currently facing multiple cases at Polda Metro Jaya, with the primary case involving alleged extortion of SYL. He has been named a suspect in this case, and investigators are also exploring potential money laundering charges (TPPU). Another case involves Firli’s alleged violation of article 36 in conjunction with article 65 of Law Number 30/2002, as amended by Law Number 19/2019, regarding a meeting with parties involved in the case.

Firli has previously filed two pretrial appeals, with the first being rejected and the second withdrawn for completion of the evidence file.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Indonesian President to Address Harvey Moeis’ Verdict if Complaints Emerge

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Indonesia‘s Attorney General Exploresždy Re-examining Harvey Moeis’ 6.5-Year Sentence for Timah Corruption

Subheadline: Potential review follows Surabaya court’s controversial acquittal in Ronald Tannur case

In a significant development, the Attorney General’s Office (AGO) in Indonesia has not ruled out the possibility of reviewing the 6.5-year prison sentence handed down to Harvey Moeis, a key figure in the high-profile timah (tin) corruption case. The AGO’s spokesman, Harli Siregar, confirmed that a re-evaluation could take place if new information or reports from the public emerge.

The AGO maintains that they are open to investigating any irregularities in the court’s decision, as demonstrated in the case of Judge Mochammad Ronald Tannur of the Surabaya State Court. Recently, two separate public complaints led to further scrutiny of his controversial acquittal of a ballot fraud suspect. The AGO will proceed with a similar approach for Harvey Moeis’ case, should significant information come to light.

Harli emphasized that the AGO is currently monitoring the situation but has not found concrete evidence of any irregularities that could undermine the court’s decision in Harvey Moeis’ case. However, he underscored the importance of public vigilance and encouraged citizens to report any suspicious activities or information they might have regarding the case.

"It’s up to the public to help monitor and report any such instances," Harli said. "We will respond accordingly if we receive convincing reports or evidence."

Speaking at a press conference today, Attorney General ST Burhanuddin briefly touched on the matter, stating that the AGO would take appropriate action if any anomalies were discovered in relation to Harvey Moeis’ case. He confirmed that the AGO would publicly disclose any findings, much like they did in the Ronald Tannur case.

Stay tuned for further developments on this story, as the AGO’s potential review of Harvey Moeis’ sentence could have significant implications for ongoing anti-corruption efforts in Indonesia.

Editor’s note: This article is based on information gathered from a press conference held by the Attorney General’s Office on January 2, 2025.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Brawijaya Alleges Prabowo’s 50-Year Sentence Call Not an Intervention"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Indonesian President‘s Remarks on Corruption Penalties Draw Attention of Supreme Court

The Supreme Court (MA) has weighed in on recent statements made by President Prabowo Subianto regarding the punishment of corrupt officials. The MA has affirmed that the President’s remarks did not constitute interference from the executive branch into the judiciary.

At a press conference hosted by the MA, Chief Spokesperson Yanto was joined by MA’s Chief of Legal Services Sobandi and MA’s Head of Inter-Institutional Relations Rudi Sudianto to discuss various topics. During the conference, a journalist inquired about President Prabowo’s statement, in which he called for severe penalties for convicted corrupters.

"Unlike his predecessor, President Joko Widodo, who consistently deferred to the judgments of the courts, President Prabowo has publicly requested a 50-year prison sentence for corrupt officials. Does the MA feel that this is an instance of intervention, or rather, a mere expression of opinion?" the journalist asked.

Yanto, the Chief Spokesperson, responded by acknowledging that he had watched President Prabowo’s remarks during a Musrenbang event at Bappenas on Monday, December 30, 2024. He clarified that the President’s statement was not an intervention.

"That was not an intervention," Yanto explained. "His statement was simply a reiteration of his position. The President did not instruct or pressure the judiciary in any way."

The Supreme Court spokesperson went on to discuss the legal framework regarding penalties for corruption in Indonesia. While the country’s laws provide for the death penalty in severe cases, no corrupt official has ever been given such a sentence. The MA spokesperson highlighted that the death penalty would only be applicable in extraordinary circumstances, such as corruption during times of natural disasters, economic crises, or war.

President Prabowo’s call for severe penalties came days after the Jakarta Corruption Court (Tipikor) sentenced Harvey Moeis to 6.5 years in prison for his role in a corruption case involving the state-owned mining company, PT Timah. During his remarks, President Prabowo did not specify which corrupt official he was referring to but emphasized that "if the evidence is clear and the damage is significant, the penalty should not be too light." He urged relevant ministry officials to review the case and consider appealing the sentence.

The Supreme Court’s statement serves as a reminder of the separation of powers between the executive and judicial branches of government. While President Prabowo is entitled to express his views on matters of public interest, the judiciary maintains its independence in adjudicating cases and handing down verdicts.

(With input from Aik and Dhn)

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"New Developments in the Judol Komdigi Corruption Scandal: Unveiling the Mafia-like Network"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Title: Unraveling the Latest Facts on theKomdigi Corruption Case Involving the Mafia Judol Group

the latest investigation into the online gambling website unlocking service mafia case involving personnel from the Ministry of Communication and Digital has widened. What was initially thought to be a case of mafia operations has now been uncovered as a potential case of corruption. Here are the latest developments:

Police Raid Homes

In a significant turn of events, the Metropolitan Police’s Criminal Investigation Unit (UKC) conducted raids at five residences related to the suspected corruption case involving the online gambling mafia group. This action was taken to gather evidence and strengthen the police’s investigation.

Previously, the case had been elevated to the status of a formal investigation by the Metropolitan Police’s Criminal Investigation Unit. On December 12, 2024, the head of public relations for the Metropolitan Police, Commissioner Ade Ary Syam Indradi, confirmed that the case was being investigated.

Over 30 Witnesses Have Been Interviewed

More than 30 witnesses have been questioned by the police, including former Minister of Communication and Informatics, Budi Arie Setiadi. Budi’s testimony lasted for 6 hours, during which he was asked 18 questions. Upon completion of his testimony, Budi Arie stated that he believed he was being framed and denied any wrongdoing.

Budi Arie emphatically stated, "I gave a statement as a witness, so stop the framing and запитать, because you will be the one to burn."

5 Homes Raided, Evidence Seized

The investigation into the alleged corruption case involving the mafia group is ongoing. The Criminal Investigation Unit of the Metropolitan Police has conducted raids at five homes, seizing multiple pieces of evidence, including documents, letters, and electronic devices. Over 30 witnesses have been interviewed, with 21 of them being employees of the Ministry of Communication and Digital.

During a press conference, Director of the Criminal Investigation Unit, Commissioner Ade Safri Simanjuntak, confirmed that the raids had been carried out. He also revealed that several pieces of evidence, including various documents and electronic devices, had been seized during the raids.

Bribery of Civil Servants Suspected

The alleged corruption case is suspected to involve bribery of civil servants from the Ministry of Communication and Digital by external parties. The bribes were reportedly given to influence the blocking of online gambling websites.

This was revealed by the Chairman of the Metropolitan Police, Irjen Karyoto, who stated that the bribery involved both active and passive corruption. The latter involved bribes given to civil servants to take action or fail to take action based on the briber’s wishes.

Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.

Continue reading on the next page

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Aid in $300 T Timah Corruption Scandal

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Corruption Scandal: Activist Frowns on Court’s Decision, Demands Return of Seized Assets from Helena Lim

Subhead:
Anti-Corruption Activist Disagrees with Court Verdict, Pressures Prosecutors to Appeal

Byline:
Lirang Brata, Jakarta

Article:

In a surprising turn of events, the Masyarakat Anti Korupsi Indonesia (MAKI) has expressed its displeasure with the court’s decision to return seized assets to Helena Lim, a money changer and businesswoman accused of participating in a multi-billion-dollar corruption scheme involving the trade of tin. The activist group is urging prosecutors to appeal the verdict, which it believes is lenient given the magnitude of the alleged crime.

MAKI’s coordinator, Boyamin Saiman, told reporters, "I was let down by the court’s decision to return Helena Lim’s assets. I urge the Attorney General’s Office to file an appeal and insist on the seizure of her wealth to make up for the Rp 300 trillion loss to the state."

In its verdict, the court ruled that Helena Lim must pay a Rp 900 million fine as damages for her role in the corruption case that benefited Harvey Moeis. Boyamin contests this, highlighting the disparity between the damages assigned to each defendant. "It’s confusing, to say the least. Harvey Moeis was initially accused of causing Rp 420 billion in losses, but the damages assigned to him in this latest verdict amount to only Rp 210 billion," he said, questioning where the remaining funds went.

Boyamin maintains that Helena Lim, who has been convicted of corruption and money-laundering, should have her assets seized to compensate for the losses incurred by the state. "Given her involvement in the corruption case and the fact that her wealth is suspected to be the proceeds of her illegal activities, her assets should be seized and forfeited to the state," he stated.

The activistgroup is calling for a fair and just legal process, underscoring the enormous losses suffered by the state due to Helena Lim’s alleged role in the illegal tin trading scheme. "Helena Lim’s conviction should serve as an example, and her assets should be seized to help recover the Rp 27 trillion in damages caused to the state," Boyamin stressed.

Moreover, MAKI has urged the government to continue investigating the case and consider declaring entrepreneur Robert Bonosusatya (RBS) a suspect in connection with the illegal tin trading scandal.

In a separate development, Helena Lim was sentenced to five years in prison for her role in the corruption case. The court also handed down a Rp 750 million fine, subsided by an additional six months of imprisonment, and ordered her to pay Rp 900 million in damages.

*}

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Billionaire Helena Lim Fined Rp 900,000,000 for Insurance Fraud of Rp 210,000,000"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: "Crazy Rich Money Changer, Helena Lim, Sentenced to 5 Years for Timor Corruption"

Subhead: "Businesswoman fined Rp 900 million and ordered to forfeit assets in multimillion-dollar corruption case"

In a landmark verdict, controversial ‘crazy rich’ money changer Helena Lim was sentenced to 5 years in prison for her role in a massive corruption case involving the smuggling of timah (tin), worth over Rp 300 trillion. The sentence was handed down by the Corruption Court in Jakarta on Monday, December 30, 2024.

The verdict, read by the panel’s head, Rianto Adam Pontoh, also included a fine of Rp 750 million, subsiding a 6-month prison term. Moreover, Lim was ordered to pay a state restitution of Rp 900 million within one month, with the threat of an additional one-year imprisonment if not complied with.

If her assets are deemed insufficient to cover the restitution, they will be seized and auctioned off, with the potential of adding another year to her prison sentence.

Lim, who operates a notorious money changer business, was accused of accepting and laundering large sums of ‘pengamanan’ (insurance money) from Harvey Moeis, a private smelter entrepreneur, involving CSR funds worth USD 30 million (Rp 420 billion). The money was allegedly channeled through Helena’s PT Quantum Skyline Exchange (PT QSE), with Lim personally pocketing a Rp 900 million commission.

Prosecutors alleged that Lim’s actions caused an astronomical loss of Rp 300 trillion to the state treasury, as per the Audit Board’s report. Lim was also charged with money laundering, alleged to have concealed the true source of the funds through complex financial transactions.

On Thursday, December 5, Lim’s trial concluded, with prosecutors seeking an 8-year prison term and a Rp 1 billion fine, accompanied by a one-year imprisonment alternative. The trial captivated public attention, with dramatic moments, including Lim’s emotional plea.

The 5-year sentence is the most severe punishment delivered so far in the ongoing Timor corruption crackdown. Authorities have vowed to continue pursuing those involved in the massive scandal, which has trembled the country’s mining industry and sparked widespread public outrage.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"PDIP’s Rieke Addresses Allegations of 12% Commission Provocation Amid MKD Nomination"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Rieke Diah Pitaloka of PDIP Refuses MKD DPR Invitation, Questions Verification Process

In a recent development, Member of Parliament (DPR) and a key figure in the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI Perjuangan), Rieke Diah Pitaloka, has publicly stated that she will not attend a hearing at the DPR’s Ethics Council (MKD DPR) amid allegations of provoking the discussion around the potential increase of Value-Added Tax (PPN) to 12%.

Rieke, in a letter uploaded on her official Instagram account, mentioned that she was unable to attend the MKD DPR hearing due to her current duties as a member of parliament, stating that she was on official business alongside her fellow DPR members during the legislature’s recess.

In her letter, Rieke also questioned the authenticity of the MKD DPR’s summon, asking for confirmation regarding the originating document number 743/PW.09/12/2024, dated December 27, 2024. She expressed her concern about receiving the summon via WhatsApp, rather than through official channels.

Additionally, Rieke raised concerns about the verification process of the witnesses’ statements, requesting the MKD DPR to provide detailed information about the outcome of this process, as specified in the DPR RI Regulation Number 2 Year 2015 on Procedural Rules of the DPR Ethics Council.

The MKD DPR has acknowledged receiving a complaint against Rieke, with the grievance centered around her statement advocating for the postponement of the PPN 12% increase during the DPR’s plenary session.

Chairman of the MKD DPR, Nazaruddin Dek Gam, confirmed receiving the complaint and subsequently summoning Rieke. However, due to the ongoing recess and the absence of DPR members from their constituencies, the hearing has been postponed. Dek Gam assured that further steps would be taken once the DPR resumes its activities.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Helena Lim’s headlines: The Curious Case of Today’s Tin Summit"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Wealthy PIK Resident Helena Lim Faces Sentencing for Alleged Corruption in Timah Commodity Trading

Article:

In a case that has captivated the Indonesian public, businesswoman and owner of PT Quantum Skyline Exchange, Helena Lim, is set to face sentencing this Monday, December 30th, over allegations of corruption involving the trading of timah (tin) commodities at PT Timah Tbk between 2015 and 2022.

Helena Lim, known for her lavish lifestyle in the exclusive Pantai Indah Kapuk (PIK) area of Jakarta, has been accused of playing a significant role in a conspiracy that cost the nation a staggering Rp300,003 trillion. The corruption involved the mismanagement of funds and illegal activities within the mineral trading sector.

Details of the Case:

Helena was initially indicted on charges carrying a potential penalty of eight years imprisonment and a fine of Rp1 billion (subsidiary to one year imprisonment). Additionally, if found guilty, she could be ordered to pay Rp210 billion in compensation to the state within a month of the court’s final ruling. Failure to do so may result in the seizure and auctioning of her assets, with an additional four years of imprisonment if her assets prove insufficient.

The session, which is scheduled to commence at 2:00 PM, is expected to bring a close to a lengthy legal process that has kept Indonesia‘s corruption watchdog, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), in the spotlight.

Background on Helena Lim and Quantum Skyline Exchange:

Helena Lim, the wealthiest woman in Indonesia’s money exchange scene, has been under scrutiny for several years. Her company, PT Quantum Skyline Exchange, was allegedly used to facilitate money laundering activities related to timah commodity trading. Through this company, Helena was accused of handling padded security deposits collected by Harvey Moeis, representing PT Refined Bangka Tin.

Conclusion:

Monday’s sentencing marks a significant milestone in Indonesia’s ongoing battle against corruption. The court’s decision will have implications not only for Helena Lim but also for the broader business community and the integrity of Indonesia’s mineral trading sector.

  • yarn prepared and tagged by yaw and talitha saiful anja.
0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts