Tag:

tindak

News

PDIP’s Rieke Under Fire for Criticizing 12% PPN Rate; DPR Delays Calling MKD for Questioning

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Indonesian Parliament‘s Ethics Panel Summons PDIP MP Rieke Diah Pitaloka Over PPN 12% Delay Remarks

Article:

The Ethics Committee of the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR), known as the Mahkamah Kehormatan Dewan (MKD), has received a complaint against PDI Perjuangan (PDIP) member Rieke Diah Pitaloka. The complaint arises from her remarks during a DPR plenary session, calling for the delay of the 12% Value-Added Tax (PPN) hike.

According to a document received by detik.com on Sunday, December 29, 2024, a letter numbered 743/PW.09/12/2024, dated December 27, 2024, was signed by the MKD chairman, Nazaruddin Dek Gam. The complainant, identified as Alfadjri Aditia Prayoga, filed the complaint on December 20, 2024, leading to an invitation for Ms. Rieke to the MKD’s boardroom on December 30, 2024.

The complaint, as cited in the letter, alleges a breach of ethics due to Ms. Rieke’s remarks on social media, urging people to reject the PPN 12% policy. MKD chairman Dek Gam confirmed receipt of the complaint and the ensuing summons but noted that it has been delayed due to the ongoing recess period. Members are currently in their respective constituencies, making a gathering unfeasible at the moment. Dek Gam mentioned that further actions would be determined by the panel upon their reconvening.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Harvey Moeis: 6.5-Year Sentence Far from Just

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Harvey Moeis Sentenced to 6.5 Years for Rp 300 Trillion Corruption Case: Too Lenient, Says Former KPK Detective

Former businessman, Harvey Moeis, was recently sentenced to 6.5 years in jail by a panel of judges in a case involving Rp 300 trillion in state losses due to corruption in the management of bauxite trading. However, many, including a former KPK investigator, believe the sentence is far from commensurate with the severity of the crime.

Yudi Purnomo, a former KPK investigator, expressed his disbelief regarding the sentence. In an interview with detik.com, he stated, "I think this is far from the public’s sense of justice." Yudi was puzzled by the judges’ rationale in assigning a minor role to Harvey Moeis in the case, emphasizing that corruption remains a grave crime regardless of one’s position.

The judges acknowledged the state’s loss amounting to Rp 300 trillion but imposed a light sentence of just 6.5 years. Moreover, Harvey Moeis was fined Rp 1 billion (with an additional 6-month imprisonment if unpaid) and ordered to pay Rp 210 billion in compensation, with a 2-year imprisonment alternative if unpaid or the seizure of his assets.

Yudi argued, "The sentence is much too lenient. I hope the prosecutors appeal and at least match the minimum prosecution demand of 12 years." He further emphasized, "This does not deter corruption and only serves to embolden other potential offenders."

The case involved Harvey Moeis and other defendants conspiring to manipulate bauxite trading, causing massive state losses. Despite Harvey Moeis’s conviction, Yudi believes there are still many unanswered questions regarding his role and the overall outcome of the trial.

The public eagerly awaits the next developments in this high-profile corruption case, hoping for a sentence aligned with the severity of the crime committed.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

1.1 Ton Gold Heist: Budi Said Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Budi Said Sentenced to 15 Years for 1.1 Ton Gold Corruption Case Worth Rp 1.1 Trillion

Subhead: ‘Crazy Rich’ Surabaya Man Found Guilty of Manipulating Gold Sales at PT Antam

Article:

In a landmark verdict, the Jakarta Corruption Court has sentenced Budi Said, also known as "Crazy Rich Surabaya," to 15 years in prison for his role in a gold corruption case involving state-owned miner PT Antam. The case, which has gripped the nation, resulted in a loss of Rp 1.1 trillion (approximately USD 78 million) to the state.

The court, in its decision read out on Friday (27/12/2024), found Budi Said guilty of corruption and money laundering. The judge stated, "We sentence the defendant to 15 years in prison and a fine of Rp 1 billion. If the fine is not paid, it will be replaced with an additional six months imprisonment."

In addition to the imprisonment, Budi Said was also ordered to pay compensation to the state in the form of 58.135 kg of Antam gold, equivalent to Rp 35.078.291.000 (approximately USD 2.5 million). If he fails to do so within a month, his assets will be seized and auctioned off.

The court considered several factors in reaching its decision, including Budi Said’s family responsibilities and his cooperative behavior during the trial. However, the primary factor was the significant financial loss incurred by the state due to Budi Said’s actions.

Budi Said was initially charged with 16 years in prison and a fine of Rp 1 billion by the prosecution. However, the court reduced the sentence by one year. The court also found that Budi Said had not purchased the 1.136 kg (1.1 ton) of gold from PT Antam, and thus, the company had no obligation to provide the gold to him.

The case has sparked public outrage and highlighted the need for stricter penalties against white-collar crimes in Indonesia. Budi Said’s high-profile trial and sentence have sent a strong message to potential offenders that corruption will not be tolerated.

Keywords: Budi Said, Corruption, PT Antam, Jakarta Corruption Court, Gold, Money Laundering, Indonesia

Meta Description: Budi Said, known as ‘Crazy Rich Surabaya,’ has been sentenced to 15 years in prison for his role in a Rp 1.1 trillion gold corruption case at PT Antam. The court also ordered him to pay compensation in the form of gold and fines.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Cash Usage Set to Surge Again

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Java-Based QRIS Payments to See 12% Value Added Tax Increase in 2025

The Indonesian government has officially announced a rise in Value Added Tax (VAT) on Java-based Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS) payments, effective January 1, 2025. This shift will impact transactions conducted using the country’s popular QR code standard.

Until now, VAT has primarily targeted certain sectors. However, this new policy introduces a 12% VAT on QRIS-based transactions, a change that has sparked conversation and concern among economists.

Professor Dr. Rahmat Setiawan, SE, MM, from the Faculty of Economics and Business at Airlangga University (FEB Unair), believes the increased VAT on QRIS transactions could lead consumers to revert to cash payments. "If QRIS transactions are subject to a 12% VAT, customers may opt for cash again. Why choose QRIS if it ultimately attracts a higher VAT?" he explained.

Prof. Setiawan condemns the government’s decision to impose a 12% VAT on QRIS transactions, stating that it contradicts their efforts to promote non-cash transactions. "The government encourages non-cash transactions to boost economic growth and combat money laundering," he pointed out, referring to the government’s and Bank Indonesia‘s joint campaign to increase non-cash transactions.

Moreover, the economist predicts that this VAT increase could impact daily necessities and potentially contribute to unemployment. "Items like deodorant, toothpaste, and soap aren’t just luxuries; they’re daily essentials, and now they’re subject to a 12% VAT," he stated. He also expressed concern that a decrease in consumption due to the increased VAT could lead to job losses.

Prof. Setiawan urges the government to reconsider or postpone the VAT hike, suggesting they could use their existing authority to cap the VAT at 11% without amending the law. "The government can lower or raise the VAT to a maximum of 15% without changing the law," he concluded.

jar/tjh

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Private Bos Smelter Sentenced to 8 Years in Prison for $300M Timah Corporation Corruption Case

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Managers of Private Smelters and Brokers Sentenced in Rp 300 Trillion Timah Corruption Case

Jakarta, Dec 27 (ANTARA) – A panel of judges at the Jakarta Corruption Court (Tipikor) sentenced three private smelter owners and a broker to varying terms of imprisonment for their roles in a Rp 300 trillion state loss corruption case involving illegal timah management.

Sentences Announced on Friday

The sentencing hearing was held at the Jakarta Corruption Court on Friday (Dec 27). The three private smelter owners are Tamron alias Aon, beneficial owner of CV Venus Inti Perkasa and PT Menara Cipta Mulia, Achmad Albani, general manager of CV Venus Inti Perkasa and PT Menara Cipta Mulia, and Hasan Tjie, director of CV Venus Inti Perkasa. The broker involved is Kwan Yung alias Buyung.

Tamron Sentenced to 8 Years

Tamron was sentenced to 8 years in prison and a Rp 1 billion fine for his role in corruption and money laundering. The judge ordered that if the fine is not paid, it would be replaced by an additional 1-year imprisonment.

Tamron was also ordered to pay Rp 3.538.932.640.663 (Rp 3.5 trillion) in reparations. If Tamron is unable to pay, he will serve an additional 5-year prison sentence.

The judge ruled that evidence seized would be considered as part of the reparations payment. If the seized evidence is more or less than the required reparations, it will be returned or additional jail time will be served, respectively.

Tamron was found guilty of violating Article 2 of the Anti-Corruption Law (UU Tipikor), in conjunction with Article 18 of the same law, Article 55 paragraph (1) point 1 of the Criminal Code (KUHP), and Article 3 or 4 of the Law on the Prevention and Eradication of the Laundering of Proceeds from Crime (UU P3P).

Albani, Tjie, and Buyung Sentenced to 5 Years

Achmad Albani, Hasan Tjie, and Kwan Yung alias Buyung were each sentenced to 5 years in prison and a Rp 750 million fine, with an alternative sentence of 6 months of imprisonment if the fine cannot be paid. The judge ruled that Albani, Tjie, and Buyung had violated Article 2 paragraph 1 or Article 3, in conjunction with Article 18 of the Anti-Corruption Law, in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) point 1 of the Criminal Code.

Sentences Lighter than Prosecution’s Demand

The sentences were lighter than the prosecution’s demands. Tamron was originally charged with 14 years in prison, a Rp 1 billion fine, and Rp 3.6 trillion in reparations, with an alternative sentence of 8 years in prison.

Meanwhile, Albani, Tjie, and Buyung were charged with 8 years in prison and a Rp 750 million fine, with an alternative sentence of 6 months in prison.

Corruption Timeline

The prosecution accused the defendants, along with other suspects, of running a long-standing corruption scheme involving illegal timah starting in 2004. Tamron, Albani, Tjie, and Buyung were allegedly involved in purchasing and collecting illegal timah from miners operating outside their concessions, then collaborating with PT Timah, a state-owned enterprise, for processing without conducting feasibility studies, leading to inflated production costs. Theiractions resulted in a state loss of Rp 300 trillion.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Budi Said Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison for 1.1-Ton Gold Corruption Case

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Surabaya‘s ‘Crazy Rich’ Budi Said Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison for ₹1.1 Trillion Emas Scam

In a landmark verdict, Crazy Rich Surabaya, Budi Said, has been sentenced to 15 years in prison for his role in a ₹1.1 trillion (IDR 165.1 trillion) gold heist involving state-owned miner PT Antam. The ruling was delivered at the Central Jakarta Corruption Court on Friday, December 27, 2024.

Budi Said was found guilty of manipulating the sale and purchase of 1.1 tons of gold belonging to PT Antam, causing significant losses to the state. The court also convicted him of money laundering.

The judge handed down the following ruling:

  • 15 years imprisonment, with an option to pay a fine of ₹1 billion (IDR 15.2 billion). If the fine is not paid, he faces an additional six months imprisonment.
  • Budi Said is ordered to pay ₹35.078 billion (IDR 5.154 trillion) to the state as compensation, representing 58.135 kg of gold. If unpaid within one month after the verdict, his assets will be seized and auctioned off.

The judge found Budi Said guilty under Articles 2 and 18 of the Corruption Eradication Law, along with Article 55(1)k of the Criminal Code and Article 64(1) of the Criminal Code, as well as Article 3 of Law No. 8/2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes.

This sentence is less severe than the prosecution’s earlier demand of 16 years imprisonment, a ₹1 billion fine, and ₹1.1 trillion in compensation.

Watch Video: Budi Said Faced 16 Years in Prison over ₹1.1 Trillion Gold Scam

Source: (amw/haf)

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Prosecutor Criticizes 6.5-Year Sentence for Bui Harvey Moeis: Too Lenient!

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Jakarta – Justice Served, But Critics Seek Harsher Punishment in $300B Timah Corruption Case

The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) has filed an appeal against the verdict issued to business tycoon Harvey Moeis and four other defendants, arguing that the sentencing was too lenient in a massive corruption case involving state-owned mining company PT Timah Tbk.

Harvey Moeis, along with Suwito Gunawan, Robert Indiarto, Reza Andriansyah, and Suparta, were convicted for their role in a $300 billion corruption case involving the illegal trading of tungsten ore, a byproduct of tin mining, between 2015 and 2022.

"The reason for the appeal is that the sentences given to the five defendants were too mild," said Sutikno, Director of Special Crimes Division at the AGO. "There’s an imbalance in the sentencing, with the punishments not reflecting the severity of their crimes."

The AGO believes that the court failed to consider the broader impact of the defendants’ actions on society, particularly in the Bangka Belitung Islands, where the illegal activities occurred.

Harvey Moeis, the mastermind behind the scheme, was initially sentenced to six years and six months in prison. However, the prosecution had sought a 12-year prison term. Other defendants received sentences ranging from five to eight years, considerably lower than the prosecution’s demands.

"I believe the court only considered the personal roles of the defendants in this case, but they failed to factor in the significant damage caused to the community and the state," Sutikno said in an interview with reporters.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Mahfud Condemns Corruptors, Terms Excessive Peace Talk as Collusion"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Former Minister Mahfud MD Slams Proposal for Settling Corruption Cases via ‘Denda Damai’

Jakarta, CNN Indonesia — Former Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal, and Security Affairs Mahfud MD has strongly condemned the proposal to settle corruption cases through a ‘denda damai’ (out-of-court settlement) system, recently advocated by Minister of Law Supratman Andi Agtas.

Mahfud argued that it’s wrong to suggest such an idea as corruption cases cannot be resolved through peaceful means. "It’s not just a mistake, it’s completely incorrect. Corruption cases cannot be settled peacefully. If settled peacefully, it would no longer be corruption; it would be called collusion," Mahfud said at the MMD Initiative office in Jakarta on Thursday (26/12).

Mahfud also pointed out that such a practice already exists informally between law enforcement agencies. "It happens all the time, secretly, between prosecutors, police, and judges. And when they’re caught, they end up in prison," he added.

The former minister emphasized that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Law and other criminal proceedings do not permit the application of ‘denda damai’ for corruption cases. He was surprised that the Minister of Law attempted to justify this practice by referring to the Law on the Prosecutors’ Office.

Mahfud explained that the ‘denda damai’ provision in the Law on the Prosecutors’ Office only applies to economic crimes related to customs, tax, and excise duties. It’s a negotiation process to lower punitive fines.

"For instance, if you’re supposed to pay a Rp100 billion fine for violating tax laws but end up paying Rp95 billion instead, that’s considered ‘denda damai’. But this process is transparent, done with the approval of the relevant ministry and the Attorney General," Mahfud said.

Previously, Minister of Law Supratman had planned to offer amnesty to state loss perpetrators through ‘denda damai’. The minister believes that the prosecutor general has the authority to impose ‘denda damai’ as permitted by the Law on the Prosecutors’ Office. However, he did not clarify how this would apply to corruption cases.

"Denda damai", according to Supratman, involves discontinuing the court process and imposing a fine agreed upon by the Attorney General. This can be used to manage cases causing state losses.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Harsh Sentence of 6.5 Years Sparks Widespread Criticism for Harvey Moeis

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Harvey Moeis’ 6.5-Year Prison Sentence Sparks Outrage; Critics Demand Harsher Punishment

Jakarta – Harvey Moeis’ 6.5-year imprisonment in the timah corruption case has drawn sharp criticism from various quarters. The court’s decision, considered lenient by many, is at odds with the prosecution’s demand for 12 years. The magnitude of the corruption case, which caused an Rp 300 trillion loss to the state, has further fueled public frustration.

The defendant was also fined Rp 1 billion, with an alternative sentence of six months in prison if unpaid. Moreover, Moeis must pay Rp 210 billion in asset replacement, with his properties to be seized and auctioned off if he fails to do so. The high court’s decision has been met with a chorus of disapproval.

"This verdict is a slap in the face of justice. How can a Rp 300 trillion loss be equated to just 6.5 years in prison?" said Hinca Panjaitan, a member of the DPR-RI‘s Commission III, summing up the sentiment shared by many.

Charles Simabura, director of the Constitutional Studies Center at Andalas University’s Faculty of Law (Pusako Unand), echoed the same sentiment. "This leniency in sentencing is counterproductive to the fight against corruption. It’s high time our judicial system starts dishing out harsher punishments for such grave crimes."

Rudianto Lallo, an(III)ance member of the DPR-RI from the NasDem fraction, concurred. "The sentences should have been maximized to serve as a deterrent. Moreover, the focus should be on recovering the assets, not just imposing fines."

The case, which involved the illegal extraction and export of timah from Bangka-Belitung islands, has had devastating consequences. It has led to environmental destruction, loss of livelihood for local communities, and a massive dent in state coffers.

Many critics argue that the court’s decision fails to reflect the gravity of the crimes committed. They demand stiffer penalties to uphold justice and deter future corruption.

Story developing…

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Stiff Sentence of 6.5 Years for Harvey Moises Sparks Public Outcry

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Title: Broad Outcry Against lenient 6.5-Year Sentence for Harvey Moeis in $300B Timah Corruption Case

Harvey Moeis, a key figure in a colossal corusption case involving the state-owned miner PT Timah, received a controversial 6.5-year prison sentence, drawing heavy criticism from various sectors of society. The massive embezzlement resulted in a staggering loss of Rp300 trillions ($22.5 billion) for the nation.

The Trial and Verdict

The Central Jakarta Corruption Court sentenced Harvey Moeis to 6 years and 6 months in prison for his role in the case, along with a Rp1 billion fine and an order to pay Rp210 billion in restitution. The verdict was significantly lower than the 12-year prison sentence demanded by the prosecution.

Presiding judge Eko Aryanto stated that Harvey Moeis had been found guilty of corruption and money laundering beyond a reasonable doubt. However, the lenient sentence has sparked widespread outrage and disbelief.

Political Figures’ Criticism

  • Hinca Panjaitan, Demokrat Party’s Deputy Chairman: "How can a Rp300 trillion loss to the nation be equated to just 6.5 years in prison?"
  • Charles Simabura, Constitutional Law Expert: "This sentence further weakens corruption fight in Indonesia. We expect the prosecution to appeal this decision."
  • Rudianto Lallo, NasDem Party’s Representative: "The sentence does not set a strong enough example. The penalty should have been maximized to serve as a deterrent."

Read More on Next Page:

Harvey Moeis’ Influence and Connections

The impact of Harvey Moeis’ ties to prominent figures and the unexpected leniency in his sentence on Indonesia’s corruption battle

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts