WASHINGTON — Amidst a violent crackdown on nationwide protests, U.S. President Donald Trump stated Monday that Iran “wants to negotiate” with Washington, following his earlier threat of military action. The protests, sparked by economic hardship, have reportedly resulted in at least 599 deaths, according to activists.
Rising Tensions and Diplomatic Signals
While Iran has not directly responded to Trump’s comments, the Omani foreign minister – a traditional intermediary between the U.S. and Iran – traveled to Tehran this weekend. Any potential negotiations are complicated by Trump’s firm demands regarding Iran’s nuclear program and ballistic missile arsenal, issues Tehran considers vital to its national defense.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, speaking to foreign diplomats, claimed “the situation has come under total control” and blamed the U.S. and Israel for instigating the violence, offering no supporting evidence. However, Araghchi also stated Iran remains “open to diplomacy,” with Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei confirming a communication channel to the U.S. remains open, contingent on “mutual interests and concerns” rather than unilateral demands.
Demonstrations and Crackdown
Monday saw a counter-demonstration of pro-government supporters flooding the streets, a show of force following days of protests directly challenging the authority of 86-year-old Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. State television broadcast chants of “Death to America!” and “Death to Israel!” from the rally, which appeared to involve tens of thousands of participants. Iran’s attorney general warned that protesters would be considered “enemies of God,” a charge that carries the death penalty.
The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, indicated a divergence between Iran’s public statements and private communications received by the administration. She stated the president is open to exploring these messages but remains prepared to use military options “if and when he deems necessary.”
Weighing Options
Trump and his national security team are reportedly considering a range of responses, including cyberattacks and potential strikes by the U.S. or Israel. The president stated, “The military is looking at it, and we’re looking at some very strong options,” and warned of unprecedented retaliation should Iran act against U.S. interests.
In addition to potential military action, Trump announced 25% tariffs on countries doing business with Iran, including Brazil, China, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, and Russia, as a means of exerting economic pressure.
Information Blackout and Rising Death Toll
With internet access restricted and phone lines cut, independent verification of events within Iran is increasingly difficult. The U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency, which has previously provided accurate reporting on unrest in Iran, reports more than 10,600 people have been detained and at least 599 people have died – 510 protesters and 89 security force members. Video circulating online purportedly shows bodies at the Kahrizak Forensic Medicine Center outside Tehran.
A witness in Tehran described deserted streets after sunset, citing fear of the crackdown. Police and the Revolutionary Guard have sent text messages warning against participation in protests.
Frequently Asked Questions
What sparked the initial protests in Iran?
The demonstrations began on December 28th over the collapse of the Iranian rial currency, which trades at more than 1.4 million to $1, as iran’s economy is squeezed by international sanctions.
What is the U.S. position regarding potential negotiations with Iran?
President Trump stated Iran “wants to negotiate” with Washington, but has set strict demands regarding Iran’s nuclear program and ballistic missile arsenal. The administration is also weighing military options.
How many people have reportedly been killed in the protests?
Activists, citing information from the U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency, report at least 599 people have died, with 510 identified as protesters and 89 as security force members.
Given the escalating tensions and limited access to information, what impact might these events have on regional stability?
