The Alexandra Magistrates Court has heard testimony revealing that the victim in a shooting case involving Bellarmine Mugabe and Tobias Matonhodze was paid to remain silent. It was disclosed that Sipho Mahlangu, a security guard who was shot twice in the back at a Hyde Park residence, received R250,000, with an additional R150,000 allegedly promised.
Guilty Pleas and State Demands
Mugabe and his cousin, Matonhodze, have pleaded guilty to several charges linked to the shooting. Mugabe too admitted to a separate incident involving the pointing of a toy gun.
Despite the guilty pleas, the state is pushing for significant prison time. Prosecutor Lufuno Maphiri has requested 12 months of direct imprisonment for the charges of pointing a firearm and being in the country illegally.
For the more severe charges, the state is seeking five years of direct imprisonment for attempted murder and 12 years for a firearms offence. The prosecution proposed 12 months for defeating the ends of justice and a fine for the possession of ammunition.
Lack of Cooperation and Recovery Efforts
Investigating officer Colonel Raj informed the court that the firearm used in the shooting has not been recovered. He stated that both accused individuals have failed to cooperate with police efforts to locate the weapon.
Because of this lack of cooperation, Colonel Raj has urged the court to impose a harsh sentence. While the defendants have petitioned for a fine or a suspended sentence, the state argues that they have shown no remorse.
Next Steps in the Legal Process
The matter has been postponed to April 29 for sentencing. Depending on the court’s evaluation of the state’s requests and the defense’s plea for leniency, the duo could face several years of direct imprisonment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the victim in the shooting case?
The victim was Sipho Mahlangu, a security guard who was shot twice in the back at a residence in Hyde Park.
What sentences is the state seeking for the most serious charges?
The state has asked for five years of direct imprisonment for attempted murder and 12 years for a firearms offence.
Why is the investigating officer calling for a harsh sentence?
Colonel Raj urged a harsh sentence because the accused have not cooperated with police to locate the firearm used in the shooting, and the state argues they have shown no remorse.
Do you believe a guilty plea should outweigh a lack of cooperation in determining a final sentence?
