Political spending by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and its affiliates has emerged as a central battleground in US elections, according to campaign finance disclosures and primary election results. When former New York school principal Jamaal Bowman ran for Congress in 2020, AIPAC approached him to attend a meeting, according to Bowman. Bowman declined the invitation, likening the lobby group to the National Rifle Association because of its influential role in US politics, and later became a vocal critic of Israel. During his 2024 Democratic primary campaign, AIPAC’s political spending group, the United Democracy Project (UDP), invested a record-breaking $14.5 million in attack ads against him, according to AdImpact data. Bowman ultimately lost the primary seat to a pro-Israel Democrat.
How AIPAC-Funded Ads Steer Clear of Foreign Policy
AIPAC-backed political advertising deliberately avoids mentioning Israel, according to political analysts and tracking groups. While AIPAC’s stated mission is keeping Congress pro-Israel, campaign data shows its electoral messaging focuses almost exclusively on domestic policy. According to Casey Kennedy, co-founder of Track AIPAC, the issue of Israel is unpopular among key voter demographics, forcing outside spending groups to message about domestic issues instead. “Zero per cent of the ads talked about Israel,” Bowman told the ABC regarding the 2024 campaign, noting that attack ads instead framed him as unsupportive of specific domestic bills backed by President Biden.
Did you know?
According to an April Pew Research poll cited in campaign analyses, 60 per cent of Americans held an unfavourable view of Israel, with that figure rising to 80 per cent among Democrats and Democrat-leaning independents.
The Michigan Senate Primary Test
The Michigan Democratic primary for the US Senate served as a major test of AIPAC’s political clout, according to regional primary results. AIPAC and its affiliates spent more than $30 million to back moderate establishment candidate Haley Stevens against progressive Israel-critic Abdul El-Sayed. El-Sayed described the spending as a “$30 million down payment on a vote to send $3 billion somewhere else,” referencing annual US military financing for Israel. Despite the heavy spending, a local poll indicated that 40.6 per cent of Democratic primary voters in Michigan were less likely to vote for a candidate supported by AIPAC. El-Sayed narrowly defeated Stevens in the primary, marking a significant hurdle for the lobby group’s strategy in a state with a high proportion of Arab American voters.
Contentious Tactics and Shell Organizations in Illinois
Illinois primary races featured similar outside spending strategies, with candidates and transparency advocates raising concerns over obscured funding sources. According to public radio station WBEZ, AIPAC-backed candidates in four Chicago-area seats declined to give clear stances on strict conditions for aid to Israel or allegations that Israel committed genocide in Gaza. Critics alleged that much of the campaign money was routed through shell organisations with local-sounding names like Elect Chicago Women and Affordable Chicago Now, which did not prominently display their ties to AIPAC. Candidate Kat Abughazaleh, one of the targets of these expenditures, told her online followers that the groups wrap money in feel-good names to obscure their origins.
Navigating Transparency Ahead of the Midterm Elections
Ahead of the November 3 midterm elections, where voters will decide 435 House seats and 35 Senate seats, AIPAC reports backing 215 winning primary candidates. The group stated that its community remains proud to support pro-Israel candidates who stand for its values. However, tracking outside spending has grown increasingly difficult, according to Track AIPAC’s Casey Kennedy, as donors increasingly utilize online portals designed to shield identities. Despite setbacks in high-profile races like Michigan and Chicago, AIPAC maintains that its 7 million members will continue working to elect leaders who support a strong US-Israel partnership.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is AIPAC’s primary strategy in elections?
According to campaign tracking data and analysts, AIPAC and its affiliates invest heavily in political ads that focus on domestic policy and opponents’ voting records rather than mentioning Israel directly.
How do outside spending groups obscure political donations?
Critics and transparency groups like Track AIPAC report that political funds are frequently routed through shell organizations with local names, as well as online donation portals designed to prevent the public identification of individual donors.
How do voters respond to AIPAC endorsements?
Voter sentiment varies by region; while some moderate and pro-Israel candidates secure victories, polling in states like Michigan indicates that a substantial portion of primary voters are less likely to support candidates backed by the lobby group.
Call to Action: Want to stay informed on campaign finance trends and upcoming midterm elections? Subscribe to our newsletter or explore our latest reporting for continuous updates.
Related reading