Russian President Vladimir Putin is actively reshaping the narrative of the war in Ukraine by framing the ongoing conflict as a direct struggle against NATO rather than a regional territorial dispute. According to data from the Institute for the Study of War, while Putin publicly claimed Russian forces seized over 3,000 square kilometers of territory this year, actual territorial gains between January and July amounted to just 97 square kilometers. This discrepancy highlights a growing reliance on state-controlled information to justify the extended duration of what the Kremlin initially labeled a “special military operation.”
Why is the Kremlin reframing the conflict as a war with NATO?
The Kremlin’s strategic shift to labeling the conflict a “real war” serves to explain the lack of a quick victory to the Russian public. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated that the situation has evolved into a “real war” because “behind Kyiv stand Berlin, and Paris, and the Hague, and Oslo, and, unfortunately, Washington.” Lt. Gen. Ihor Romanenko, former deputy head of Ukraine’s general staff of armed forces, told Al Jazeera that this rhetoric is necessary to justify why the conflict is entering its fifth year. By positioning NATO as the primary adversary, the Russian leadership attempts to deflect from tactical failures and domestic economic pressures, including fuel shortages.
How does Russia maintain its “constructed reality” on the battlefield?
Russia maintains a narrative of battlefield success by prioritizing symbolic gestures over territorial control. According to the Institute for the Study of War, the Kremlin relies on an information space that rejects tactical reality. A Ukrainian serviceman identified as Andriy told Al Jazeera that Russian units are often ordered to reach specific landmarks or central squares to plant flags for photo opportunities, despite the high probability of those soldiers being killed shortly after. This tactic allows the Kremlin to broadcast images of “liberated” territory even when the tactical situation on the ground remains contested or under Ukrainian control.
While the Kremlin claimed to have seized over 3,000 square kilometers (1,158 square miles) of land in 2024, verified geolocated data from the Institute for the Study of War indicates the actual figure is closer to 97 square kilometers (37.4 square miles).
What are the potential future trends in Russian mobilization?
Analysts suggest that the Kremlin is preparing the Russian public for a broader mobilization effort following the September 18-20 parliamentary vote. Volodymyr Fesenko, head of the Kyiv-based Penta think tank, noted that as Russia faces increased strikes on its territory and ongoing economic instability, it must manufacture justifications for further escalation. While a “partial mobilization” was declared in September 2022, the state has since relied on sign-up bonuses and the forced recruitment of migrants. Future trends indicate a likely shift toward more formal, large-scale conscription as the government struggles to maintain momentum in the face of what it describes as a collective Western effort against Russia.
How does Ukraine respond to Russian claims of NATO involvement?
Ukrainian officials and frontline personnel characterize the Kremlin’s rhetoric as a face-saving measure. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has challenged Putin to visit contested areas like Kostiantynivka to seek a diplomatic resolution. Drones operators and other servicemen on the front lines, such as a drone operator named Ihor, told Al Jazeera that these claims are intended to hide the reality that Ukrainian forces are successfully countering Russian advances. By blaming NATO, Moscow avoids acknowledging that its military is failing to achieve its original, stated objective of demilitarizing Ukraine.
Pro Tip: Tracking Battlefield Data
To distinguish between official government claims and battlefield reality, experts recommend cross-referencing televised state announcements with geolocated reports from independent think tanks like the Institute for the Study of War, which track confirmed troop movements and territorial control.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Why did Russia change its terminology from “special military operation” to “war”?
According to Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, the change reflects the reality that the conflict involves support from multiple Western nations, including the U.S., Germany, and France. - Does Russia currently hold the territory it claims to have seized?
Not according to verified data. For instance, Putin claimed to have “completely liberated” Kostiantynivka, but Ukrainian forces still maintain control over parts of the city. - Is there a risk of further mobilization in Russia?
Analysts like Lt. Gen. Ihor Romanenko suggest that Russia is likely preparing for further mobilization efforts following the September parliamentary elections to sustain its military operations.
For more updates on the conflict in Ukraine and global geopolitical shifts, subscribe to our newsletter or explore our archive of conflict analysis.