The evolutionary roots of heel-first walking allowed early hominins to travel long distances more efficiently, but at the cost of higher impact forces on their bones and joints, according to a Penn State-led study published Sept. 8 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. While modern humans instinctively land heel-first with every step, chimpanzees vary their foot-strike patterns significantly when moving on two legs, shedding light on a distinctive biomechanical tradeoff in human origins.
Evolutionary Significance of Heel-First Walking
Early hominins adopted the heel-strike gait to transition from ape-like locomotion to a more efficient stride, according to research led by Nicholas Holowka, assistant professor of anthropology at Penn State. This shift allowed our ancestors to roll smoothly from the back of the foot to the front, conserving an estimated 26% to 41% of the metabolic energy required by a midfoot-striking gait, as measured by treadmill tests with human participants wearing portable respirometry systems.
That energetic savings proved crucial. According to Holowka, the efficiency of heel-first walking enabled early humans to cover vast distances daily, supporting the adoption of hunting and gathering practices that ultimately helped them spread across the globe.
Biomechanical Tradeoffs and Impact Forces
That efficiency came with a physical penalty. High-speed cameras and metal force plates at Stony Brook University and the University at Buffalo showed that heel-strikes generate much higher impact forces than midfoot-strikes. In humans, the rate of impact force loading reached up to 162% higher than during midfoot-strikes, according to the study data.
Pro Tip: When analyzing human bipedalism, researchers look closely at foot-strike angles. Chimpanzees display 2.4 to 8.6 times greater ranges of foot-strike angles than humans, favoring softer midfoot or side landings when moving on two legs.
Study co-author Nathan Thompson, associate professor at the New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, compared midfoot walking to sneaking across a creaky wooden floor. Chimpanzees prefer this softer landing when walking bipedally, using heel-strikes less often than when moving on all fours, the researchers found. For humans, however, coping with the intense loading of a heel strike required later anatomical adaptations, including thicker heel bones and larger knee and ankle joints, according to the research team.
Modern Environments and Future Research
Holowka noted that researchers are interested in exploring how modern environments interact with these high-impact walking mechanics in future studies. Even so, the authors emphasize that walking remains a healthy exercise because human bodies evolved specifically to handle these forces.
Did You Know? The study data was gathered using high-resolution cameras and force plates, analyzing gait mechanics across 15 chimpanzees from prior datasets alongside new laboratory trials with 12 human participants.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the Penn State study reveal about human walking?
The study found that consistent heel-first strides—while unique to humans and vital for long-distance energy conservation—create significantly higher impact forces on bones and joints compared to the variable foot strikes used by chimpanzees.
How much energy does heel-first walking save?
According to researchers, walking heel-first saves modern humans an estimated 26% to 41% of the metabolic energy required to walk on the ball of the foot.
Did early ancestors walk like modern humans?
No. Early human ancestors likely walked more like chimpanzees, using variable, less consistent foot landings on the balls or sides of their feet, which limited how far they could travel before the evolution of efficient heel-striking.
Join the Conversation
How do your daily walking habits fit into your routine? Share your thoughts in the comments below, or subscribe to our newsletter for more updates on human evolution and anthropology research.
Related reading