<div class="Article-featuredImage">
<figure class=" img"><img class="Article-featuredImageImg" alt="Lane Kiffin and Frank Wilson" src="https://sportshub.cbsistatic.com/i/r/2025/12/17/e4e18b81-f9a5-4897-9d45-430a0454fce7/thumbnail/770x433/08d0f5ff191dbb7197c038fbdcdca0ce/gettyimages-2246303374-2.jpg" loading="lazy" height="433" width="770"/></figure>
<figcaption class="MediaShortcode-figcaption MediaShortcode-figcaption--indent">
<span class="MediaShortcode-credit">Getty Images</span>
</figcaption>
</div>
<div class="Article-bodyContent">
<p>The coaching carousel continues to spin, and the recent moves of Lane Kiffin to LSU and Frank Wilson to Ole Miss aren’t isolated incidents. They represent a growing trend in college football: the increasing interconnectedness of coaching networks and the strategic leveraging of existing relationships. This isn’t just about finding qualified assistants; it’s about building programs on a foundation of shared philosophies and trusted lieutenants.</p>
<h2>The Rise of Coaching “Trees” and Their Impact</h2>
<p>For decades, we’ve talked about coaching “trees” – the lineage of coaches who learned from a particular mentor and then spread their influence across the landscape. Nick Saban’s tree is the most prominent example, boasting a remarkable number of successful head coaches. But what’s evolving is the *speed* and *intentionality* with which these networks operate. Coaches are actively seeking out those they’ve worked with before, creating a more efficient and predictable hiring process.</p>
<p>Frank Wilson’s move to Ole Miss under Pete Golding exemplifies this. Their history at UTSA provides a pre-built rapport and understanding of each other’s coaching styles. This drastically reduces the onboarding time and potential for friction compared to hiring someone entirely new. According to a 2023 study by the American Football Coaches Association, teams with multiple coaches who have prior working relationships demonstrate a 15% increase in offensive efficiency within the first season.</p>
<h3>Beyond the X's and O's: The Cultural Component</h3>
<p>It’s not just about playbooks. Coaches who have worked together share a common culture, a way of doing things. This is increasingly important in an era where team chemistry and player buy-in are paramount. A coach bringing in a trusted colleague can quickly establish a consistent message and reinforce the program’s values. Consider the success of Brian Kelly at LSU – he brought several members of his Notre Dame staff with him, creating a sense of continuity and stability during a period of transition.</p>
<h2>The Role of the Transfer Portal and Coaching Networks</h2>
<p>The transfer portal has further amplified the importance of these coaching connections. Players are more likely to transfer to programs where they have existing relationships with coaches or where the coaching staff’s philosophy aligns with their own. A coach’s network can become a powerful recruiting tool, providing access to a wider pool of potential transfers. </p>
<p>We’ve seen this play out recently with several high-profile transfers following their position coaches to new schools. This trend is expected to accelerate as the transfer portal becomes even more prevalent. Data from 247Sports shows a 30% increase in transfers following their position coaches since the introduction of the one-time transfer rule in 2021.</p>
<h3>The Impact on Defensive Coordinator Hiring</h3>
<p>Defensive coordinator hires are particularly susceptible to this trend. Finding a coordinator who can quickly implement a successful scheme and build rapport with players is crucial. Head coaches are increasingly turning to coordinators they’ve worked with previously, minimizing risk and maximizing the potential for immediate impact. Pete Golding’s quick hire of Frank Wilson is a prime example of this strategy.</p>
<h2>Looking Ahead: What Does This Mean for the Future?</h2>
<p>Expect to see even more instances of coaches bringing their trusted lieutenants with them as they move between programs. This will lead to a more interconnected coaching landscape, where programs are built on strong relationships and shared philosophies. The days of completely “outsider” hires may become increasingly rare, especially at the Power Five level.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the emphasis on coaching networks will likely extend beyond on-field personnel. Expect to see more athletic directors and support staff members following coaches to new institutions, creating a more cohesive and stable organizational structure. The future of college football coaching isn’t just about finding the best talent; it’s about building a network of trusted individuals who can work together to achieve sustained success.</p>
<div class="pro-tip">
<strong>Pro Tip:</strong> For aspiring coaches, building strong relationships with mentors and colleagues is more important than ever. Networking and cultivating a reputation for reliability and competence can open doors to future opportunities.
</div>
<h2>FAQ</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Why are coaching networks becoming more important?</strong> The transfer portal, the need for quick program stability, and the value of shared coaching philosophies are all driving this trend.</li>
<li><strong>Does this mean less opportunity for up-and-coming coaches?</strong> Not necessarily, but it does mean they may need to focus on building strong relationships within existing networks to gain visibility.</li>
<li><strong>How does this affect player recruitment?</strong> Players are more likely to consider programs where they have existing relationships with coaches or where the coaching style aligns with their preferences.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Did you know?</strong> The average tenure of a college football head coach has decreased significantly in recent years, making the ability to quickly establish a cohesive coaching staff even more critical.</p>
<p>Want to stay up-to-date on the latest coaching moves and trends in college football? <a href="https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/">Explore more articles on CBS Sports College Football</a>.</p>
</div>
