@media screen and (min-width: 1201px) {
.jopub65d3015b6a423 {
display: block;
}
}
@media screen and (min-width: 993px) and (max-width: 1200px) {
.jopub65d3015b6a423 {
display: block;
}
}
@media screen and (min-width: 769px) and (max-width: 992px) {
.jopub65d3015b6a423 {
display: block;
}
}
@media screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 768px) {
.jopub65d3015b6a423 {
display: block;
}
}
@media screen and (max-width: 767px) {
.jopub65d3015b6a423 {
display: block;
}
}
For example, the heavily trafficked main street in the village of Halvrimmen, which has magically become a kind of millionaire’s strip.
Many words have been written about the new property valuation law, which most of all appears like a regular junk shop. We have seen a sea of examples of provisional property assessments so skewed as to defy all comprehension.
Because the system is set up in a way that ordinary citizens can neither see through, check, calculate nor understand.
It would be nice to test the truth of that narrative. The problem is just that it’s impossible.
This is a leader. It was written by a member of our board of directors and expresses Nordjutske’s position.
In any case, it is not logical, and so we are back to the old saying: If it cannot be explained, it cannot be defended.
Did the politicians – if anyone at all – notice the consequence when the new assessment act was adopted in due course? One hopes not.
And the home owners have to pay the bill.
Here it appears that home owners who live in an area where the landowner association owns common areas will, from next year, have to pay land tax on those areas.
Now another layer is added to the story of a tragicomic and opaque assessment system, where common areas are suddenly defined as “undeveloped business land.”
The audit firm BDO states that the bill to the home owners initially looks innocent, but over time adds up to “not insignificant amounts.”
And then we just have to pay. Also when the landowner association’s playground or noise pollution is suddenly an undeveloped, taxable commercial plot.
The entire new property tax system is built on the narrative that four out of five home owners will pay less in tax with the new rules than with the old ones.
Hidden extra bill for homeowners will “come as a shock”
For a previously unknown piece in the puzzle about future housing taxes has appeared in a response to the Danish Parliament’s tax committee from Tax Minister Jeppe Bruus (S).
Or rather: Assessments of green areas, water basins and noise barriers.
And then the land charge must be paid.
also read
An old saying goes that if it cannot be explained, it cannot be defended.
That way of speaking is to that extent worth pulling out of the vocabulary when we now again have occasion to deal with the famous property valuations.
It’s totally kuk-kuk.
@media screen and (min-width: 1201px) {
.vxgwu65d3015b6a3fd {
display: block;
}
}
@media screen and (min-width: 993px) and (max-width: 1200px) {
.vxgwu65d3015b6a3fd {
display: block;
}
}
@media screen and (min-width: 769px) and (max-width: 992px) {
.vxgwu65d3015b6a3fd {
display: block;
}
}
@media screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 768px) {
.vxgwu65d3015b6a3fd {
display: block;
}
}
@media screen and (max-width: 767px) {
.vxgwu65d3015b6a3fd {
display: block;
}
}
Related posts:
@media screen and (min-width: 1201px) {
.dsbig65d3015b6a3c2 {
display: block;
}
}
@media screen and (min-width: 993px) and (max-width: 1200px) {
.dsbig65d3015b6a3c2 {
display: block;
}
}
@media screen and (min-width: 769px) and (max-width: 992px) {
.dsbig65d3015b6a3c2 {
display: block;
}
}
@media screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 768px) {
.dsbig65d3015b6a3c2 {
display: block;
}
}
@media screen and (max-width: 767px) {
.dsbig65d3015b6a3c2 {
display: block;
}
}