• Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World
Newsy Today
news of today
Home - United States House of Representatives
Tag:

United States House of Representatives

News

House Passes $70B Immigration Enforcement Bill

by Rachel Morgan News Editor June 9, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

The U.S. House of Representatives narrowly passed a $70 billion immigration enforcement bill on Tuesday, clearing the way for President Donald Trump to sign the legislation into law. The 214-212 vote, which fell largely along party lines, funds Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Border Patrol for the next three years, providing the administration with a surge of capital to support its goal of deporting approximately 1 million people annually.

How the funding is allocated

According to the White House, the $70 billion package includes $38 billion for ICE, $26 billion for the Border Patrol, and a $5 billion reserve for unforeseen expenses. This funding represents a significant addition to the nearly $140 billion previously allocated to the same agencies under the tax and spending cuts bill passed by a Republican-led Congress last year. Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, stated that this budget provides “regular, normal funding” intended to prevent future legislative stalemates by covering the agencies for a three-year term.

View this post on Instagram about Border Patrol, White House
From Instagram — related to Border Patrol, White House

Why lawmakers are divided

The legislation faced intense opposition from Democrats, who criticized the lack of oversight and the absence of operational reforms. Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries characterized the bill as a “blank check” for what he described as a “violent mass deportation machine.” Democrats had pushed for specific mandates, including requirements for agents to remove masks, display ID badges, and obtain judicial warrants before entering private property—proposals that were ultimately excluded from the final bill. Conversely, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise defended the funding as a matter of public safety, arguing that a vote against the bill is a vote to “defund the police.”

Why lawmakers are divided

What happens next

With the bill headed to the President’s desk, the Department of Homeland Security—now under the leadership of Secretary Markwayne Mullin—is expected to accelerate its enforcement operations. While the administration has yet to reach its annual target of 1 million deportations, officials including border czar Tom Homan have signaled that expanded enforcement actions may soon target major cities, including New York. Additionally, the administration continues to pursue policies that complicate the status of legal immigrants, including efforts to end Temporary Protective Status and updates to green card processing, which may lead to further legal and procedural challenges for affected individuals.

US News LIVE: Hakeem Jeffries Slams Trump's ICE Plan, Warns of $70 Billion Funding | Anti ICE Speech

June 9, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Senate Passes $70B Immigration Bill Without Trump Funding Limits

by Rachel Morgan News Editor June 5, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate passed a $70 billion legislative package early Friday morning to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Border Patrol. The vote, which concluded just before 5 a.m., secures funding for these agencies for the next three years, covering the remainder of President Donald Trump’s term.

The 52-47 vote brings a close to months of legislative gridlock, during which Democrats blocked the funding to demand policy changes following the fatal shootings of two protesters by federal agents in January. While the bill passed with nearly uniform party support—with Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska the only Republican to oppose it and Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado absent—the path to the floor was complicated by intense internal Republican debate over an unrelated $1.776 billion settlement fund.

US Senate chamber vote

The settlement fund, which stems from a lawsuit filed by President Trump against the IRS regarding the leak of his tax returns, became a major point of contention. Despite acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stating earlier in the week that the fund would not move forward, many lawmakers remained skeptical. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., expressed frustration over the delay, stating shortly before midnight, “This would have been done several hours ago if we weren’t having to deal with some of the issues around the fund.”

Throughout the day and into the night, the Senate defeated multiple amendments aimed at blocking or restricting the fund. This included a proposal by Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., that would have redirected settlement payments to law enforcement officers injured during the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Another amendment, proposed by Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., sought to move the settlement money into a Department of Justice anti-fraud fund. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., criticized the retention of the fund, stating, “Republicans are now leaving taxpayers to rely on nothing more than a promise from Donald Trump’s personal fixer. That is not accountability. That is a permission slip.”

Senate passes immigration enforcement funding after clashes over ballroom, ‘anti-weaponization’ fund

The legislative process faced further uncertainty after President Trump signaled conflicting views on the fund, telling reporters on Wednesday that it remains “incredibly important” while noting he did not know its current status.

What Happens Next

With the Senate having cleared this hurdle, the bill is expected to head to the House of Representatives. Lawmakers anticipate that the House may take up the legislation as early as next week. Should the House pass the measure, it would finalize a funding solution that has remained elusive since the Department of Homeland Security’s funding lapsed in mid-February and subsequent bipartisan negotiations failed to produce an agreement on immigration enforcement tactics.

June 5, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

House Passes Resolution to Limit Military Action Against Iran

by Rachel Morgan News Editor June 3, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

In a significant legislative rebuke of the administration’s foreign policy, the U.S. House of Representatives voted 215-208 on Wednesday to approve a war powers resolution aimed at halting U.S. Military action against Iran. The passage of this resolution, which saw four Republicans break ranks to join Democrats, marks the first time the House has successfully moved to curb the three-month-long conflict.

The vote highlights a growing divide between the legislative and executive branches regarding the limits of commander-in-chief authority. House Speaker Mike Johnson had previously attempted to block such an outcome, abruptly shutting down floor proceedings two weeks ago when the resolution appeared poised for approval. Despite these efforts, mounting political pressure and the ongoing nature of the conflict have emboldened lawmakers to push back against the administration’s war strategy.

The Context of the Conflict

The resolution arrives as the administration faces increasing domestic and international challenges. Since the U.S. Joined Israel in launching strikes against Iran on February 28, the conflict has contributed to rising gas prices and inflationary pressures for American consumers. Iran’s ability to interrupt shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has threatened the global flow of oil, natural gas and fertilizer.

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries characterized the conflict as a “reckless and costly war of choice,” noting that it has cost taxpayers over $100 billion. While an uneasy ceasefire was declared in April, the situation remains volatile, further complicated by Israel’s broadening military engagements against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Implications and Future Outlook

The resolution is largely viewed as a symbolic assertion of Congressional authority, as it would not immediately terminate the conflict. The administration maintains that the hostilities have effectively ceased due to the April ceasefire, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio has warned that such legislative action could tie the administration’s hands, potentially discouraging Iran from negotiating a lasting peace deal.

House passes Iran war powers resolution for first time

As the resolution moves to the Senate, its ultimate success remains uncertain. While four Republican senators joined Democrats last month to advance a similar measure, the Senate has not yet held a final vote. President Trump is expected to resist any attempts by Congress to limit his military authority, setting the stage for a continued constitutional dispute over which branch holds the final say in matters of war and peace.

Looking ahead, the House is expected to consider further national security measures, including a potential war powers resolution regarding Lebanon and a separate effort to authorize support for Ukraine. With midterm elections approaching, the political tension surrounding these foreign policy decisions is likely to persist as both parties navigate the balance between domestic priorities and international entanglements.

June 3, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Congressional Black Caucus Urges Firms to Oppose GOP Redistricting

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 26, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

The Congressional Black Caucus issued a formal call to action on Tuesday, urging more than 250 major corporations to take a public stand against redistricting efforts in Republican-led states. Lawmakers contend these legislative map redrawing processes are “coordinated efforts to silence Black voices at the ballot box” and seek to eliminate majority-Black U.S. House districts.

Rep. Yvette Clarke, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, stated in an interview that the letter is intended to put “corporate America on notice.” She emphasized that firms benefiting from Black consumers and workers “cannot look away while Black political power is dismantled in plain sight.” Despite the firm tone, Clarke noted that the caucus is not seeking an adversarial relationship with the private sector.

Business for Voting Rights coalition logo

The current push follows a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last month that weakened a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, an outcome that has enabled several states to move forward with changes to their congressional districts. The caucus is specifically requesting that companies publicly condemn these redistricting plans, engage in direct dialogue with caucus members regarding the protection of voting rights, and disclose political donations made to Republican politicians in states currently undergoing redistricting.

This initiative marks a shift in the caucus’s strategy regarding corporate accountability. Many of the companies receiving the letter—including Apple, Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Tesla, Salesforce, Target, PayPal, Intel, and Starbucks—were part of a 2021 coalition known as Business for Voting Rights, which previously advocated for the John Lewis Voting Rights Act. The caucus’s letter challenges these companies to prove whether their past commitments to racial equity and democratic principles remain “rooted in principle or convenience.”

Congressional Black Caucus lambasts redistricting scheme

The political landscape remains fraught, with Democratic Rep. Steven Horsford of Nevada noting, “We understand who the occupant in the White House is and the reality of Republicans being in charge.” However, he added that the caucus is demanding companies “stand on the side of democracy, fairness and equal representation.”

The path forward remains uncertain. While the caucus has also recently called for Black athletes to boycott public universities in states engaged in aggressive redistricting, the effectiveness of these corporate appeals is yet to be determined. Most companies contacted for comment have not yet responded, and Microsoft has declined to comment. Any potential reversal of these redistricting trends through federal legislation would likely require Democrats to secure control of both chambers of Congress and the presidency, suggesting that significant legislative change may not be immediate.

May 26, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Federal Court Blocks Alabama’s New US House Map

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 26, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

Federal Judges Block Alabama Redistricting Plan

A three-judge panel issued a preliminary injunction on Tuesday, temporarily blocking Alabama’s attempt to implement a new congressional map. The court’s ruling requires the state to continue utilizing the same court-ordered districts that were in place for the 2024 congressional elections.

The decision marks a significant setback for state Republicans, who had sought to introduce a map that could provide the GOP with an advantage in a key U.S. House race. The contested map was intended to influence the upcoming November midterm elections, specifically targeting the seat currently held by Democratic U.S. Rep. Shomari Figures.

Lawyers representing Black voters had requested the injunction, citing a 2023 finding by the same judicial panel that the state’s previous map was intentionally discriminatory. They further argued that modifying district lines in the middle of an election year would create unnecessary administrative chaos.

Broader Implications and Legal Context

This ruling is the latest development in a complex legal landscape following a U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a Black-majority district in Louisiana and weakened the federal Voting Rights Act. That high court ruling has prompted Republican-led efforts across several Southern states to reshape districts with large minority populations that have historically elected Democrats.

Representative Shomari Figures joins to discuss Alabama's special session on redistricting

The current redistricting push is part of a wider effort supported by President Donald Trump as he seeks to maintain the Republicans’ narrow House majority in the November elections. Since President Trump first urged Texas to redraw its U.S. House districts last summer, approximately half a dozen Republican-led states have enacted new voting maps, many of which remain subject to legal challenges.

A Shifting Political Map

The legal activity surrounding redistricting has impacted election schedules and candidate processes across the country:

  • Louisiana: Republican Gov. Jeff Landry postponed the state’s May 16 congressional primaries until later this summer to allow lawmakers time to consider a new map that would eliminate a majority-Black district.
  • South Carolina: Legislators have considered a proposal to discard the results of the June 9 congressional primary and hold a new primary in August using revised districts.
  • Tennessee: The state enacted a new map that carves up a Black-majority district in Memphis, potentially allowing Republicans to capture all nine of the state’s seats. This process included a temporary reopening of the candidate qualifying period.

While Republican-led states continue to pursue these redistricting plans, Democrats have countered with new districts in California and expect to gain a seat following court-imposed redistricting in Utah.

What May Happen Next

The immediate future of Alabama’s electoral map remains uncertain. The state has the option to appeal the panel’s ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. Depending on the outcome of such an appeal, or further proceedings in the lower courts, the state may be forced to proceed with the current court-ordered districts or may eventually be permitted to implement its proposed changes.

May 26, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

South Carlina to take up redistricting of US House

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 18, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

Lawmakers in the South Carolina state House are set to begin a potentially contentious discussion Monday regarding the reshaping of the state’s congressional districts. The effort centers on whether to adopt a U.S. House map aligned with the desires of President Donald Trump, which could result in a clean sweep of all seven seats for Republicans.

Republican Governor Henry McMaster, who convened the special session on redistricting, stated that maximizing the number of Republicans sent to Washington is critical. According to McMaster, this strategy is intended to prevent Democrats from seizing control of the House and attempting to impeach Trump.

The Legal and Political Battle

The push in South Carolina follows similar aggressive efforts by Republicans in Alabama, Louisiana, and Tennessee. These moves leverage a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that weakened Voting Rights Act protections for minority districts, effectively allowing Republicans to redraw districts with large Black populations that have historically elected Democrats.

View this post on Instagram about Supreme Court, Voting Rights Act
From Instagram — related to Supreme Court, Voting Rights Act

In South Carolina, this strategy specifically targets the seat held by U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn, who is currently the only Democrat among the state’s seven House representatives. Clyburn has stated he has no plans to retire regardless of how the districts are changed.

Speaking to reporters in Washington last week, Clyburn noted that he maintains addresses in Santee, Charleston, and Columbia, stating, “I live in three districts. I’ll decide which one to run in.” He further characterized the effort as an attempt at “turning the clock back to Jim Crow 2.0,” asserting that the issue is not about his specific district or voting, but something more systemic.

Internal Republican Concerns

Despite the push for a 7-0 map, some Republicans have expressed caution. There are concerns that attempting to secure every seat could spread Republican voters too thin, which may leave some currently held Republican districts vulnerable to Democratic victories.

Internal Republican Concerns
Republican lawmakers voting redistricting bill

Timeline and Legislative Next Steps

The redistricting debate coincides with a tight election calendar:

  • May 26: Scheduled start of early voting for statewide primaries.
  • June 9: Date of the South Carolina statewide primaries.

the state House is considering legislation that would move U.S. House primaries to August. If this legislation clears the House, it must then proceed to the Senate for approval.

The National Redistricting Landscape

South Carolina’s efforts are part of a broader national redistricting conflict. Following President Trump’s urging to Texas Republicans last year to redistrict, Republicans believe they could gain as many as 15 seats through new maps in the following states:

  • Alabama
  • Florida
  • Missouri
  • North Carolina
  • Ohio
  • Tennessee
  • Texas

Conversely, Democrats believe they could gain six seats from new maps in Utah and California. While these projections exist, the final outcome remains uncertain as litigation continues in several states and the ultimate decision rests with the voters.

South Carolina redistricting process underway

May 18, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Letlow and Fleming advance to Louisiana Senate runoff, Cassidy loses

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 17, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

In a decisive blow to the incumbent, Sen. Bill Cassidy was defeated in Saturday’s Republican primary in Louisiana. The loss underscores a growing trend of political retribution within the party, as Cassidy was unable to overcome the lasting impact of his vote to convict President Donald Trump during the impeachment trial regarding the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

U.S. Rep. Julia Letlow and state treasurer John Fleming have advanced to a runoff election scheduled for June 27. Letlow, who entered the race after securing President Trump’s endorsement in January and Fleming, a former U.S. House member and Trump administration official, will now compete for the nomination.

The Power of Endorsement Over Expenditure

The results highlight a stark divide between financial resources and political influence. Cassidy waged an aggressive reelection campaign, with his campaign expected to spend roughly $9.6 million on advertising through May 16, supported by an additional $12.3 million from the Louisiana Freedom Fund super PAC. This total was nearly double the combined spending of his opponents.

In contrast, Letlow’s campaign spent approximately $3.9 million, with the Accountability Project super PAC contributing about $6 million. Fleming’s campaign spent roughly $1.5 million. Despite being outspent, Letlow capitalized on Trump’s support, which she praised during her victory party, calling Trump “the best president this country has ever had.”

A Pattern of Party Purges

Cassidy’s defeat is part of a broader effort by President Trump to remove individuals he views as disloyal. The president targeted Cassidy on the morning of the election, labeling him a “disloyal disaster” and a “terrible guy.” Following the results, Trump posted on social media, “that’s what you get by voting to Impeach an innocent man.”

A Pattern of Party Purges
Louisiana Senate President Trump

This campaign of retribution has extended beyond Louisiana. On May 5, Trump helped oust five of seven Indiana state senators who had rejected his redistricting plan. The momentum continues next Tuesday, as U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky faces Trump-backed challenger Ed Gallrein. Trump has already called Massie a “major Sleazebag” and urged voters to “get this LOSER out of politics.”

The intraparty turmoil comes at a critical juncture as Republicans face the possibility of losing control of Congress in the November midterm elections.

Policy Clashes and Political Friction

The campaign was marked by sharp ideological battles. Cassidy and the Louisiana Freedom Fund attacked Letlow for her past support of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which she had supported while interviewing for the presidency of University of Louisiana-Monroe in 2020.

Cassidy’s defeat ends Senate career after Trump feud in Louisiana primary

Cassidy also faced friction with Trump over health appointments. While Cassidy supported Robert F. Kennedy Jr. For the Department of Health and Human Services, he later became critical of Kennedy’s funding cuts for vaccine development. Trump blamed Cassidy for the failed nomination of his second choice for surgeon general, Casey Means, due to Cassidy’s support for vaccinating newborns for hepatitis B.

Election Confusion and Legal Shifts

The primary took place amid significant administrative and legal upheaval. A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding the Voting Rights Act led Louisiana leaders to delay House primaries to redraw district lines, creating potential confusion for voters.

Cassidy further argued that a new primary system enacted last year—which requires voters to request a partisan ballot—was “destined to be confusing.” Dadrius Lanus, executive director of the state Democratic Party, echoed these concerns, stating his team received hundreds of calls from voters and describing the situation as a “whirlwind of confusion.”

What May Happen Next

Because of Louisiana’s strong Republican leanings, the June 27 runoff between Letlow and Fleming is likely to determine the state’s next senator. On the Democratic side, while Jamie Davis has advanced to a runoff, the second spot remains too close to call between Nicholas Albares and Gary Crockett.

The outcome of these races, along with the upcoming primary in Kentucky, could further signal the extent of President Trump’s influence over the GOP’s composition heading into the general election.

May 17, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

FBI Director Kash Patel denies drinking allegations at Senate hearing

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 12, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

A Senate budget hearing turned confrontational Tuesday as FBI Director Kash Patel clashed with Democratic lawmakers over allegations regarding his personal conduct and leadership of the agency.

The exchange centered on reports that Patel drinks excessively on the job and has been unreachable to his staff. Patel dismissed these claims as “unequivocally, categorically false,” stating, “I will not be tarnished by baseless allegations and fraudulent statements to the media.”

Legal Battle Over Agency Leadership Portrait

The tension began when Sen. Chris Van Hollen, a Democrat from Maryland, questioned Patel about a recent article in The Atlantic magazine. The publication provided an unflattering portrait of Patel’s leadership of the nation’s premier federal law enforcement agency.

View this post on Instagram about Chris Van Hollen, Heated Exchange Over Conduct During
From Instagram — related to Chris Van Hollen, Heated Exchange Over Conduct During

Patel has since sued over the story. In response, The Atlantic stated that it stands by its reporting and intends to vigorously defend itself against what it called a “meritless lawsuit.”

Heated Exchange Over Conduct

During the hearing, Patel shifted the focus to Sen. Van Hollen, accusing the lawmaker of “slinging margaritas on the taxpayer dime” during a previous visit to El Salvador. This was a reference to Van Hollen’s meeting with Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who had been jailed in El Salvador following a mistaken deportation. “The only person who has been drinking during the day on the taxpayer dime was you,” Patel asserted.

Van Hollen pushed back, calling Patel’s claims “provably false.” He explained that the El Salvador government had misrepresented the encounter, alleging that officials staged the meeting by a hotel pool with drinks that only appeared to be alcohol.

The confrontation escalated when Van Hollen asked if Patel would be willing to take a test to determine if he has a drinking problem. Patel responded, “I’ll take any test you’re willing to take.”

Scrutiny of Travel and Personnel Decisions

While Republican senators praised Patel’s leadership and he touted major crime-fighting achievements, Democratic members pressed him on other controversies, including:

FBI Director Kash Patel denies drinking allegations in heated Senate exchange | NBC New York
  • International Travel: Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware questioned the cost and mission-related value of a trip to the Winter Olympics in Milan, Italy, where Patel partied with the U.S. Men’s hockey team following their gold medal victory.
  • Personnel Actions: Lawmakers questioned the mass terminations of agents who had worked on investigations into President Donald Trump.

Defending his trip to Italy, Patel asserted that the FBI was responsible for security at the Olympics and claimed the visit helped facilitate the transfer of a Chinese cyber criminal, who had been detained by Italian authorities, into U.S. Custody.

Significance and Implications

This exchange underscores a sharp partisan divide regarding the current direction of the FBI. The clash reveals a fundamental disagreement between those who view Patel’s leadership as successful and those who see his conduct and personnel decisions as a potential liability to the agency’s mission.

Potential Next Steps

The conflict between the FBI Director and The Atlantic may continue to unfold in court as the defamation lawsuit proceeds. The FBI’s budget and Patel’s administrative decisions, including the termination of specific agents and the use of funds for international travel, could remain points of contention in future congressional oversight hearings.

May 12, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

GOP redistricting confuses voters and burdens election officials

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 11, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

A rush to redraw congressional districts across several Southern states is triggering widespread voter confusion and creating significant logistical burdens for election officials, according to recent reports. The upheaval, occurring in the midst of primary season, follows a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that weakened the Voting Rights Act and has sparked an intensely partisan gerrymandering battle initiated by President Donald Trump to protect a slim Republican majority.

The Catalyst: A Weakened Voting Rights Act

Last month’s Supreme Court decision has prompted Republican-led legislatures to reconsider existing maps. In Louisiana, the ruling required a review of a 2024 map that featured two majority-minority congressional districts designed to elect Black representatives. In a state where approximately 30% of the population is Black, the GOP-controlled Legislature may eliminate one or both of these districts.

The Catalyst: A Weakened Voting Rights Act
Supreme Court

The ruling has also encouraged Republicans in Tennessee, South Carolina, Alabama, and Mississippi to consider eliminating four Democratic districts, three of which are represented by Black lawmakers. Florida has implemented a new map intended to cost Democrats four of their eight seats out of 28.

State-Level Chaos and Logistical Failures

The impact of these changes is manifesting as immediate administrative chaos across the region:

View this post on Instagram about Supreme Court, South Carolina
From Instagram — related to Supreme Court, South Carolina
  • Louisiana: Governor Jeff Landry declared an emergency and suspended congressional primaries to allow for a new map. However, early voting had already begun on May 2. The secretary of state’s office reported that nearly 179,000 primary ballots had been cast as of Friday, including roughly 53,000 returned by mail. These votes in congressional contests will not be counted.
  • Alabama: Lawmakers passed legislation on Friday allowing for a “do-over” of congressional primaries. While voting on May 19 will proceed using old districts, those votes may not count if a court permits a switch to new districts.
  • Tennessee: The state was the first to enact a new map following the Supreme Court decision. The new map divides Memphis among three congressional districts. Before the map was enacted, the state’s elections coordinator warned county officials that the change would require retraining poll workers, reprogramming election systems, and potentially adjusting precinct boundaries.
  • South Carolina: Lawmakers may move congressional races—or all June 9 primaries—to August. The state Elections Commission noted that more than 6,800 mail ballots had been sent out, with 260 already returned. Executive director Conway Belangia told lawmakers that a separate election for congressional primaries could cost $3 million and would involve compressed preparation time.
  • Mississippi: While primaries occurred in March, President Trump is pushing for the redrawing of the state’s four congressional districts. A special session of the Legislature is scheduled for May 20.

Impact on Voters and Democratic Trust

The administrative instability has led to reports of voter disenfranchisement. Sallie Davis, a 66-year-old New Orleans resident, recounted voting early only to find a sign at her polling booth where the race for Democratic U.S. Rep. Troy Carter had been crossed off with a ballpoint pen. “I think I have been disenfranchised,” Davis said, expressing fear that her vote would not count.

Voting rights advocates warn that this chaos is a systemic issue. Amir Badat, a voting rights attorney and activist in Jackson, Mississippi, stated, “Modern-day voter suppression relies on election administration errors and chaos, and that’s what we’re going to see play out in all of these states.”

In Tennessee, activists point to 2022 events in Nashville as a warning; a state report from that period found that over 3,000 voters were assigned to incorrect districts and more than 430 cast ballots in the wrong races. Matia Powell, executive director of Civic TN, noted that it will be “really hard” for election commissions to manage the current short timelines.

Broad Implications

The instability is creating a ripple effect of confusion among both voters and officials. Bobby Singleton, Alabama’s Senate Democratic leader, reported that even the heads of elections are unsure of how to proceed. Michael McClanahan, president of the NAACP’s Louisiana State Conference, noted that some voters are opting out entirely because they believe the elections have been suspended.

Broad Implications
GOP redistricting confuses voters Broad Implications

Anneshia Hardy, executive director of Alabama Values, warned that such volatility may lead to long-term disengagement. “Once people stop believing that the process is stable and fair, disengagement is going to increase,” Hardy said, emphasizing that democracy relies on the belief that participation matters.

May 11, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Alabama lawmakers approve new US House primary, if courts allow it

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 9, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

A national redistricting battle over U.S. House seats shifted toward Republicans on Friday, driven by a Virginia court ruling that invalidated a Democratic effort and new legislation in Alabama that could trigger fresh primary elections.

These developments are part of a broader movement by Republicans in several Southern states to capitalize on a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that significantly weakened protections for minorities under the Voting Rights Act.

Alabama Prepares for Potential Primary Reset

Republican Governor Kay Ivey quickly signed a law allowing for new primary elections if courts permit the state to use GOP-drawn House districts for the November midterm elections. The law would effectively ignore the May 19 primary results for certain congressional seats and direct the governor to schedule new primaries under revised districts.

View this post on Instagram about Supreme Court, Democratic Rep
From Instagram — related to Supreme Court, Democratic Rep

The move is an attempt to replace a court-selected map, currently in place until after the 2030 census, which required a second district where Black voters are the majority or nearly so. This existing map led to the 2024 election of Democratic Rep. Shomari Figures. Republican officials seek to restore a 2023 map, previously rejected by a federal court, which could allow them to reclaim Figures’ district.

Alabama Prepares for Potential Primary Reset
Supreme Court

“With this special session successfully behind us, Alabama now stands ready to quickly act, should the courts issue favorable rulings in our ongoing redistricting cases,” Gov. Ivey said in a statement.

However, a three-judge panel rejected Alabama’s request to lift the injunction on Friday evening. The request remains pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.

The legislation sparked intense protest at the Alabama Statehouse, where one demonstrator was dragged from the House gallery by security. Democratic state Sen. Rodger Smitherman described the vote as a setback to the “days of Reconstruction,” while other Black lawmakers argued the legislation mirrors the state’s “shameful Jim Crow history.”

Procedural Failure in Virginia

In Virginia, the state Supreme Court invalidated a redistricting measure that Democrats hoped would gain them as many as four additional U.S. House seats. The court ruled that the Democratic-led legislature violated constitutional procedural requirements.

Alabama lawmakers approve special election bills during chaotic final day of special session

Under the Virginia Constitution, a constitutional amendment must be approved in two separate legislative sessions with a state election occurring in between. The court found the legislature’s initial approval last October came too late, as more than 1.3 million ballots—approximately 40% of the total—had already been cast in the general election.

Redistricting Efforts Across the South

Other Southern states are pursuing similar strategies to redraw congressional lines:

  • Louisiana: A Senate committee considered options proposed by Republican state Sen. John “Jay” Morris that could eliminate one or both of the state’s current Black-majority U.S. House districts. Democratic state Sen. Sam Jenkins argued these maps reduce Black voting power, a claim Morris denied, stating his goal was to be “respectful of the traditional boundaries.”
  • South Carolina: Lawmakers discussed a proposed map intended to give Republicans a clean sweep of the state’s seven U.S. House seats. The plan involves breaking up the 6th District, represented by Democratic U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn, though some Republicans worry this could make the other six districts less Republican. A legislative subcommittee has advanced a plan to delay the congressional primary to August and reopen candidate filing if the map is approved.
  • Tennessee: The state recently enacted new districts that carve up a Black-majority, Democratic-held district in Memphis. The state Democratic Party filed a lawsuit on Friday to prevent these districts from being used in this year’s elections.

National Implications

The high-stakes redistricting war is centered on the closely divided House, where both parties are seeking an edge for the midterm elections. Following a push from President Donald Trump last summer for Texas to redraw its districts, Republicans believe they could gain as many as 14 seats through new districts across several states, while Democrats believe they could gain up to six.

Despite these goals, the outcomes remain uncertain, as aggressive gerrymandering could potentially backfire in highly competitive districts.

May 9, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • Game Prices Rising Higher Than Expected

    June 22, 2026
  • US Stocks Hover Near Record Highs as Oil Prices Slip

    June 22, 2026
  • Romeo Beckham Makes Acting Debut in Tennis Romance ‘Forty Love

    June 22, 2026
  • Russia Issues Over 1,100 ‘Anti-Woke’ Visas in 2025

    June 22, 2026
  • MotoGP Updates: Holeshot Devices Banned and Grid Layout Changes

    June 22, 2026

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Maya Jama flaunts her taut midriff in a white crop top and denim jeans during holiday as she shares New York pub crawl story

    April 5, 2025
  • 2

    Saar-Unternehmen hoffen auf tiefgreifende Reformen

    March 26, 2025
  • 3

    Marta Daddato: vita e racconti tra YouTube e podcast

    April 7, 2025
  • 4

    Unlocking Success: Why the FPÖ Could Outperform Projections and Transform Austria’s Political Landscape

    April 26, 2025
  • 5

    Mecimapro Apologizes for DAY6 Concert Chaos: Understanding the Controversy

    May 6, 2025

Follow Me

Follow Me
  • Cookie Policy
  • CORRECTIONS POLICY
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF SERVICE

Hosted by Byohosting – Most Recommended Web Hosting – for complains, abuse, advertising contact: o f f i c e @byohosting.com


Back To Top
Newsy Today
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World