• Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World
Newsy Today
news of today
Home - U.S. Republican Party
Tag:

U.S. Republican Party

News

Trump to Meet With Frustrated GOP Senators

by Rachel Morgan News Editor June 24, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

President Donald Trump is scheduled to visit Capitol Hill on Wednesday for a closed-door Senate Republican luncheon, his first such appearance in over a year. The visit comes as GOP senators express frustration over the President’s pressure to prioritize his voting legislation, his interference in personnel matters, and his influence on primary elections, according to reports from the Associated Press.

Why is there tension between the President and Senate Republicans?

The relationship between the President and the Senate GOP caucus has strained over several policy and political conflicts. According to the Associated Press, President Trump has repeatedly pressured Senate Majority Leader John Thune to pass the SAVE America Act, which would implement strict voter ID requirements and citizenship verification. Senator Thune has maintained that the bill lacks the necessary 60 votes to overcome a filibuster in the 53-47 Senate, calling the goal “not realistic.”

Why is there tension between the President and Senate Republicans?

Beyond the voting bill, the President has blocked the confirmation of his own nominee for national intelligence director, Jay Clayton, while demanding that lawmakers fund a White House ballroom project. Furthermore, the President’s decision to endorse primary challengers against incumbents John Cornyn and Bill Cassidy has alienated some of his previous allies, according to the Associated Press.

How are GOP leaders responding to the President’s demands?

Senate leadership is attempting to project unity ahead of the meeting, though internal divisions remain evident. Senator John Cornyn stated on Tuesday that the caucus is “not on the same page,” adding that the current lack of alignment is “dangerous” for the upcoming midterm elections. Meanwhile, Senator Thom Tillis expressed a desire for a “conciliatory” meeting to move past recent grievances.

WATCH: Trump attends Senate GOP luncheon

The invitation for the President to attend the luncheon was extended by Senator Rick Scott, a close ally of the President, without informing Senate Majority Leader Thune. This move has been characterized as an unusual step that highlights the varying perspectives within the conference. While Senator Scott argues that the party should aggressively push its priorities regardless of Democratic support, Senator Thune has emphasized the need to focus on realities within the chamber, noting that the “alternative universe” of social media platforms like X often fails to reflect the facts on the ground.

What could happen next?

The upcoming meeting serves as a high-stakes effort to determine whether the Republican caucus can establish a cohesive agenda for the remainder of the President’s term. A possible next step is that senators may use the time to press the President for details regarding the ongoing war in Iran, a topic on which most lawmakers have not yet been briefed, according to Senator Mike Rounds.

What could happen next?

If the meeting fails to resolve the friction over the SAVE America Act, the legislative gridlock could continue. A group of 25 House Republicans has already vowed to oppose all legislation until the voting bill advances, a hardline stance that could further complicate the Senate’s ability to pass critical measures, such as the renewal of a key surveillance law, which the President has threatened to block unless his voting requirements are attached.

June 24, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Rising Tensions: Trump and GOP Senators Clash in Election Year

by Rachel Morgan News Editor June 19, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

President Donald Trump’s relationship with Senate Republicans has reached a critical juncture, characterized by legislative gridlock and public discord. The President recently stalled the confirmation of his own nominee for national intelligence director, Jay Clayton, and conditioned the renewal of a key surveillance law on new terms, according to Associated Press reporting. These actions have strained an alliance that, just one year ago, was unified behind major tax and spending legislation.

Why the alliance between Trump and Senate Republicans is fraying

The current friction marks a sharp departure from the previous legislative session, where Republican lawmakers largely aligned with the President to pass a massive tax and spending package. As the November election approaches, the legislative focus has shifted. According to the Associated Press, President Trump has increasingly demanded the passage of the SAVE America Act—legislation requiring proof of citizenship for voting—despite Senate Majority Leader John Thune’s warnings that the necessary votes do not exist. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., signaled frustration with the White House’s approach, stating, “I think somebody’s not dialing the president into the complexities of what he’s done here.”

Why the alliance between Trump and Senate Republicans is fraying

How the legislative agenda has stalled

The divide extends beyond the voting bill to broader policy initiatives. President Trump has requested congressional funding for a White House ballroom project, sought the appointment of an acting intelligence director, and asked lawmakers to cede authority regarding the Iran war. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., characterized the President’s deal to end the Iran war as “the worst foreign policy blunder in decades.” These demands have brought much of the Senate’s business to a halt, placing Republican incumbents on the defensive as they attempt to defend their majorities in the upcoming election, the Associated Press reports.

Trump sends Senate GOP reeling with intelligence chief chaos

What happens next for Senate leadership

Senate Majority Leader John Thune faces the difficult task of managing the President’s expectations while maintaining Senate operations. While President Trump has pressured Thune to scrap the filibuster, Thune has maintained that the Senate lacks the votes to do so. Unlike his predecessor, Mitch McConnell, Thune has not yet been the target of personal attacks from the President, according to Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo. Analysts suggest that if the legislative impasse continues, the internal party tension may deepen. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, continues to advocate for the filibuster’s removal, while other members, such as Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, have pushed back, stating it is the responsibility of those proposing legislation to secure the necessary support.

June 19, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

New Medicaid Guidance Puts Patient Coverage at Risk

by Chief Editor June 11, 2026
written by Chief Editor

New Medicaid work requirements mandated by the federal government are set to take effect next year, creating significant uncertainty for millions of enrollees who rely on the program for life-saving medical care. Under new guidance from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), participants will be required to document 80 hours of monthly work, community service, or education to maintain eligibility. While exemptions exist for those deemed medically frail, the administration’s narrow definition—requiring proof that a condition “significantly impairs” the ability to work—has sparked concerns from healthcare providers and state officials about potential coverage losses and increased bureaucratic burdens for the nation’s sickest patients.

How Will the New “Medical Frailty” Definition Affect Patients?

The updated CMS guidance requires that individuals seeking a “medically frail” exemption must prove their condition prevents them from meeting work requirements. According to the federal rule, a diagnosis alone is insufficient. Patients must provide documentation that their symptoms “significantly impair” their ability to fulfill the 80-hour monthly mandate. Adrianna McIntyre, a professor at the Harvard University school of public health, stated that this policy shift will likely force the sickest patients to navigate complex, time-consuming paperwork, which she suggests will lead to people “needlessly losing coverage.” For patients like DeAnna Brandon, a multiple myeloma survivor, the fear is that an inability to secure formal medical certification could jeopardize the twice-monthly chemotherapy treatments keeping her cancer in remission.

View this post on Instagram about Associated Press, Harvard University
From Instagram — related to Associated Press, Harvard University
Did you know?

While the federal government has allocated $200 million to assist states with implementation, an analysis by the Associated Press suggests the actual costs for technology upgrades and additional staffing will likely exceed $1 billion.

Why Are States Struggling to Implement the New Rules?

State Medicaid agencies are facing a technical and logistical challenge as they prepare for a January kickoff. Many states originally intended to use existing claims data to automatically exempt vulnerable enrollees. However, CMS administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz confirmed to the Associated Press that the agency will not allow states to “categorically exclude” individuals based solely on a diagnosis. This leaves officials in a difficult position. Kinda Serafi, a partner at the legal and consulting firm Manatt Health, noted that states are being asked to make eligibility determinations using information—specifically data proving “significant impairment”—that does not currently exist in their systems.

Why Are States Struggling to Implement the New Rules?

What Is the Government’s Stated Goal for These Requirements?

Proponents of the policy, including the Trump administration, argue that work requirements are necessary to preserve Medicaid for those with the greatest need. Dr. Mehmet Oz cited a report from the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, which claimed that able-bodied Medicaid enrollees spend an average of 6.1 hours a day “watching TV or just hanging out.” Oz described the new requirements as a “commonsense” approach to discourage government dependency. Conversely, critics, including Democratic lawmakers and patient advocates, characterize the move as an attack on the healthcare safety net, arguing that the policy ignores the reality of those living with chronic conditions who are not yet qualified for federal disability benefits.

Adrianna McIntyre & Yevgeniy Feyman [The Good Fight round 2]
Pro Tip: Documentation Matters

If you are a Medicaid enrollee with a chronic health condition, begin discussing the new requirements with your primary care provider now. Ask if they are prepared to provide the specific clinical documentation required to certify that your condition limits your ability to work, as some providers may be hesitant or unable to provide such certifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Who is affected by the new Medicaid work requirements?
    Expansion enrollees aged 19 to 64 are subject to the new rules, which require 80 hours of work, community service, or education per month.
  • Are there exemptions for people with disabilities?
    Yes, exemptions exist for those classified as “medically frail,” but the new federal rule requires proof that the condition significantly impairs the ability to work, rather than relying on a diagnosis alone.
  • What happens if I cannot meet the requirements?
    Failure to meet the work mandate or provide valid exemption documentation could result in the loss of Medicaid health insurance coverage.
  • Do I need to prove my status immediately?
    The government allows for self-attestation in 2027 and 2028, but official verification through claims data or medical documentation will be required during the renewal process in 2028.

Have you or a family member been impacted by changes to Medicaid eligibility? Share your experience in the comments below or subscribe to our health policy newsletter for ongoing updates as states roll out these new requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

June 11, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

House Passes $70B Immigration Enforcement Bill

by Rachel Morgan News Editor June 9, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

The U.S. House of Representatives narrowly passed a $70 billion immigration enforcement bill on Tuesday, clearing the way for President Donald Trump to sign the legislation into law. The 214-212 vote, which fell largely along party lines, funds Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Border Patrol for the next three years, providing the administration with a surge of capital to support its goal of deporting approximately 1 million people annually.

How the funding is allocated

According to the White House, the $70 billion package includes $38 billion for ICE, $26 billion for the Border Patrol, and a $5 billion reserve for unforeseen expenses. This funding represents a significant addition to the nearly $140 billion previously allocated to the same agencies under the tax and spending cuts bill passed by a Republican-led Congress last year. Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, stated that this budget provides “regular, normal funding” intended to prevent future legislative stalemates by covering the agencies for a three-year term.

View this post on Instagram about Border Patrol, White House
From Instagram — related to Border Patrol, White House

Why lawmakers are divided

The legislation faced intense opposition from Democrats, who criticized the lack of oversight and the absence of operational reforms. Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries characterized the bill as a “blank check” for what he described as a “violent mass deportation machine.” Democrats had pushed for specific mandates, including requirements for agents to remove masks, display ID badges, and obtain judicial warrants before entering private property—proposals that were ultimately excluded from the final bill. Conversely, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise defended the funding as a matter of public safety, arguing that a vote against the bill is a vote to “defund the police.”

Why lawmakers are divided

What happens next

With the bill headed to the President’s desk, the Department of Homeland Security—now under the leadership of Secretary Markwayne Mullin—is expected to accelerate its enforcement operations. While the administration has yet to reach its annual target of 1 million deportations, officials including border czar Tom Homan have signaled that expanded enforcement actions may soon target major cities, including New York. Additionally, the administration continues to pursue policies that complicate the status of legal immigrants, including efforts to end Temporary Protective Status and updates to green card processing, which may lead to further legal and procedural challenges for affected individuals.

US News LIVE: Hakeem Jeffries Slams Trump's ICE Plan, Warns of $70 Billion Funding | Anti ICE Speech

June 9, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Trump Pardons Former Congressman in Insider Trading Case

by Rachel Morgan News Editor June 6, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

President Donald Trump has issued a full, complete, and unconditional pardon to Stephen Buyer, a former Republican congressman from Indiana who previously served nearly two years in prison for insider trading.

Buyer, 67, was sentenced to 22 months in prison in 2023 after being convicted for making illegal stock trades based on inside information obtained while working as a consultant and lobbyist. His conviction involved the $26.5 billion merger between T-Mobile and Sprint, as well as trades involving the management consulting company Navigant. In addition to his prison sentence, which ended with his release in 2025, Buyer was ordered to pay a $10,000 fine and forfeit more than $350,000 in illegal gains.

In granting the pardon, which was dated Thursday and released by the White House late Friday, President Trump cited Buyer’s career as a judge advocate general in the Army and his time in the House of Representatives as “distinguished and highly productive.”

Trump Pardons Former Congressman President

Buyer, who left office in 2011, maintained his innocence following the announcement. He stated that the pardon “corrects a politically motivated prosecution” and described his imprisonment as “horrific for a crime that I did not commit.”

The pardon follows a campaign by Republican allies to secure clemency for the former congressman. On May 31, President Trump shared two letters on his Truth Social platform advocating for the pardon. One letter, signed by more than 40 former Republican members of Congress, claimed Buyer was “targeted by the deep state” due to his role as a House prosecutor during the 1998 impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton. The signatories further characterized Buyer as a “victim of lawfare conducted by the Biden Administration.”

Trump Pardoned Former Republican Congressman Fraudster Stephen Buyer 6/6

A second letter, submitted in June 2025, was signed by five current House Republicans: Tom Cole of Oklahoma, Ken Calvert of California, Marlin Stutzman of Indiana, Jack Bergman of Michigan, and Pete Sessions of Texas. They argued that a pardon would bring justice to the case.

The Supreme Court had previously declined to hear Buyer’s appeal in May, leaving his conviction in place prior to this presidential action. While the Constitution grants the president broad authority to issue pardons for federal crimes, such actions do not erase an individual’s criminal record. Moving forward, the pardon may be viewed as an act of mercy or justice by supporters, though it remains a point of contention regarding the nature of the original prosecution.

June 6, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Senate Passes $70B Immigration Bill Without Trump Funding Limits

by Rachel Morgan News Editor June 5, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate passed a $70 billion legislative package early Friday morning to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Border Patrol. The vote, which concluded just before 5 a.m., secures funding for these agencies for the next three years, covering the remainder of President Donald Trump’s term.

The 52-47 vote brings a close to months of legislative gridlock, during which Democrats blocked the funding to demand policy changes following the fatal shootings of two protesters by federal agents in January. While the bill passed with nearly uniform party support—with Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska the only Republican to oppose it and Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado absent—the path to the floor was complicated by intense internal Republican debate over an unrelated $1.776 billion settlement fund.

US Senate chamber vote

The settlement fund, which stems from a lawsuit filed by President Trump against the IRS regarding the leak of his tax returns, became a major point of contention. Despite acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stating earlier in the week that the fund would not move forward, many lawmakers remained skeptical. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., expressed frustration over the delay, stating shortly before midnight, “This would have been done several hours ago if we weren’t having to deal with some of the issues around the fund.”

Throughout the day and into the night, the Senate defeated multiple amendments aimed at blocking or restricting the fund. This included a proposal by Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., that would have redirected settlement payments to law enforcement officers injured during the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Another amendment, proposed by Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., sought to move the settlement money into a Department of Justice anti-fraud fund. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., criticized the retention of the fund, stating, “Republicans are now leaving taxpayers to rely on nothing more than a promise from Donald Trump’s personal fixer. That is not accountability. That is a permission slip.”

Senate passes immigration enforcement funding after clashes over ballroom, ‘anti-weaponization’ fund

The legislative process faced further uncertainty after President Trump signaled conflicting views on the fund, telling reporters on Wednesday that it remains “incredibly important” while noting he did not know its current status.

What Happens Next

With the Senate having cleared this hurdle, the bill is expected to head to the House of Representatives. Lawmakers anticipate that the House may take up the legislation as early as next week. Should the House pass the measure, it would finalize a funding solution that has remained elusive since the Department of Homeland Security’s funding lapsed in mid-February and subsequent bipartisan negotiations failed to produce an agreement on immigration enforcement tactics.

June 5, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Federal Court Blocks Alabama’s New US House Map

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 26, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

Federal Judges Block Alabama Redistricting Plan

A three-judge panel issued a preliminary injunction on Tuesday, temporarily blocking Alabama’s attempt to implement a new congressional map. The court’s ruling requires the state to continue utilizing the same court-ordered districts that were in place for the 2024 congressional elections.

The decision marks a significant setback for state Republicans, who had sought to introduce a map that could provide the GOP with an advantage in a key U.S. House race. The contested map was intended to influence the upcoming November midterm elections, specifically targeting the seat currently held by Democratic U.S. Rep. Shomari Figures.

Lawyers representing Black voters had requested the injunction, citing a 2023 finding by the same judicial panel that the state’s previous map was intentionally discriminatory. They further argued that modifying district lines in the middle of an election year would create unnecessary administrative chaos.

Broader Implications and Legal Context

This ruling is the latest development in a complex legal landscape following a U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a Black-majority district in Louisiana and weakened the federal Voting Rights Act. That high court ruling has prompted Republican-led efforts across several Southern states to reshape districts with large minority populations that have historically elected Democrats.

Representative Shomari Figures joins to discuss Alabama's special session on redistricting

The current redistricting push is part of a wider effort supported by President Donald Trump as he seeks to maintain the Republicans’ narrow House majority in the November elections. Since President Trump first urged Texas to redraw its U.S. House districts last summer, approximately half a dozen Republican-led states have enacted new voting maps, many of which remain subject to legal challenges.

A Shifting Political Map

The legal activity surrounding redistricting has impacted election schedules and candidate processes across the country:

  • Louisiana: Republican Gov. Jeff Landry postponed the state’s May 16 congressional primaries until later this summer to allow lawmakers time to consider a new map that would eliminate a majority-Black district.
  • South Carolina: Legislators have considered a proposal to discard the results of the June 9 congressional primary and hold a new primary in August using revised districts.
  • Tennessee: The state enacted a new map that carves up a Black-majority district in Memphis, potentially allowing Republicans to capture all nine of the state’s seats. This process included a temporary reopening of the candidate qualifying period.

While Republican-led states continue to pursue these redistricting plans, Democrats have countered with new districts in California and expect to gain a seat following court-imposed redistricting in Utah.

What May Happen Next

The immediate future of Alabama’s electoral map remains uncertain. The state has the option to appeal the panel’s ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. Depending on the outcome of such an appeal, or further proceedings in the lower courts, the state may be forced to proceed with the current court-ordered districts or may eventually be permitted to implement its proposed changes.

May 26, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Cornyn and Paxton Flood Texas Airwaves Before GOP Senate Runoff

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 25, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

SAN ANTONIO — As the Texas Republican U.S. Senate primary runoff reaches its conclusion, the state’s political landscape remains defined by a high-stakes advertising war and the shadow of presidential influence. With voters heading to the polls Tuesday, candidates Sen. John Cornyn and state Attorney General Ken Paxton have opted to forgo public campaign events on the final day, instead allowing their extensive media campaigns to make the closing arguments.

The runoff, which marks the end of a quest for the GOP nomination spanning more than a year, has seen advertising spending reach $109 million. While Cornyn’s camp has heavily outspent pro-Paxton groups by an almost nine-to-one margin over the past year, that financial gap has narrowed significantly in the campaign’s final week, with Cornyn’s spending now less than twice that of his opponent’s.

View this post on Instagram about Texas Republican Party, President Donald Trump
From Instagram — related to Texas Republican Party, President Donald Trump

The intensity of the race has been further complicated by President Donald Trump’s direct involvement. On May 19, Trump endorsed Paxton, a move that included a dismissal of Cornyn. Over the weekend, Trump reaffirmed his support, disparaging Cornyn as “VERY disloyal to me” while praising Paxton’s loyalty. This follows a pattern of presidential intervention in other states, where Republican voters in Indiana and Kentucky have recently favored primary challengers over incumbents who had opposed the president’s agenda.

Cornyn, who is seeking a fifth term, has attempted to reconcile the criticism by emphasizing his legislative record, noting that 99.3% of his votes aligned with Trump. “Obviously the president is entitled to make his pick,” Cornyn told reporters on Monday, adding that “Texans are a pretty independent breed and people will be making their own choices.”

John Cornyn, Ken Paxton face off in runoff fight for Senate race

The closing days of the campaign have seen a shift in strategy. Cornyn’s network continues to focus on ethical and personal questions surrounding Paxton, arguing that such baggage could lead to a loss against Democratic nominee James Talarico in the general election. Conversely, Paxton’s campaign and supporting groups have centered their messaging on Trump’s endorsement, with the Lone Star Liberty Fund recently initiating efforts to challenge Talarico directly.

Wayne Hamilton, a former executive director of the Texas Republican Party, characterized the race as “a slug fest,” noting the aggressive nature of the competition between the campaigns and third-party groups.

Paxton Flood Texas Airwaves Before

Looking ahead, the outcome of Tuesday’s vote is expected to carry significant implications for the direction of the Texas Republican Party. As the state’s 18.7 million voters weigh these competing visions, the result may determine the party’s official standard-bearer for a general election that both sides acknowledge could be competitive. Should Paxton succeed, it may signal a shift in party loyalty, whereas a win for Cornyn could reinforce the position of the incumbent guard despite opposition from the party’s current leadership in Washington.

May 25, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

House Republicans Delay Iran War Powers Resolution Vote

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 22, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

WASHINGTON — House Republican leadership declined to hold a vote on a war powers resolution this Thursday, choosing to delay the measure until June after struggling to secure the necessary support to defeat the Democratic-led initiative.

The legislation, which aims to compel President Donald Trump to withdraw from the ongoing conflict with Iran, has become a focal point of intensifying friction on Capitol Hill. While Republican leaders argued the postponement was intended to accommodate absent members, the move highlights a growing divide within the GOP regarding the president’s military campaign, which began over two months ago without congressional authorization.

Democratic Representative Gregory Meeks, who sponsored the bill, criticized the delay as a “political game,” asserting that supporters had the necessary votes to pass the resolution. House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries and other caucus leaders issued a joint statement labeling the decision to pull the vote as “cowardly.”

Growing Congressional Frustration

The conflict has faced mounting scrutiny as the stalemate in the Strait of Hormuz continues to disrupt global shipping and contribute to an increase in domestic gasoline prices, which reached a nationwide average of $4.53. Lawmakers are increasingly citing the 1973 War Powers Resolution, which mandates that presidents must seek congressional approval for military engagements exceeding 60 days.

View this post on Instagram about War Powers Resolution, Strait of Hormuz
From Instagram — related to War Powers Resolution, Strait of Hormuz

“We’re past 60 days so it’s got to be brought to us to vote on. We’re following the law,” said Representative Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican, who noted his intention to support the resolution. Conversely, some GOP lawmakers continue to back the president’s strategy. Representative Brian Mast, the Republican chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, defended the administration’s posture, stating, “I don’t believe in getting hit and walking away and pretending as though it didn’t happen.”

The White House Stance

The administration maintains that the requirements of the 1973 law are no longer applicable due to a ceasefire, though President Trump has publicly stated that military leaders should remain prepared for a “full, large scale assault of Iran” if an acceptable deal is not reached. The president has questioned the constitutionality of the 1973 act itself.

JUST IN: House Republicans And Democrats Clash Over Latest Iran War Powers Resolution

Internal GOP discord is also evident in the Senate, where Republican lawmakers are working to secure votes to dismiss a separate war powers resolution that advanced earlier this week. Senator Thom Tillis, a Republican, expressed frustration with the administration’s handling of the situation, specifically criticizing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Potential Implications

The delay of the House vote sets the stage for a potential legal and political showdown regarding the limits of executive authority in military conflicts. As the conflict persists, the momentum behind the war powers resolution could force a formal confrontation between Congress and the White House. If the resolution eventually passes both chambers, it would be a concurrent resolution, which lawmakers contend would take effect without the president’s signature.

Potential Implications
Gregory Meeks House floor

With the House now in a period of delay, the coming weeks may see continued pressure from both sides as lawmakers navigate the legal requirements of the War Powers Resolution and the administration’s ongoing military strategy in the Middle East.

May 22, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Trump endorses Paxton over Cornyn in Texas GOP Senate primary

by Rachel Morgan News Editor May 19, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

President Donald Trump has entered the Texas GOP Senate primary runoff, endorsing Attorney General Ken Paxton in an effort to oust four-term incumbent Senator John Cornyn. The endorsement, announced Tuesday, comes just one week before the May 26 runoff election.

The announcement broke during a campaign event in Allen, Texas, where Paxton told supporters, “I have so much respect for the president and appreciate so much his endorsement.” In a social media post, Trump described Paxton as a “true MAGA Warrior who has ALWAYS delivered for Texas and will continue to do so in the United States Senate.”

A Divide Over Loyalty and Strategy

The endorsement highlights a rift between the Make America Great Again movement and the Republican establishment. While Senator Cornyn has supported Trump’s agenda in Washington, Trump signaled that the relationship has been strained. Trump referred to Cornyn as a “good man” but claimed he “was not supportive of me when times were tough” and was “very late in backing me” during the Republican nomination process.

The tension dates back to 2023, when Cornyn suggested Trump’s “time has passed him by” and could not win the 2024 presidency. Cornyn also initially criticized Trump’s border wall plan, though he now supports the project. In response to the endorsement, Cornyn posted on X that he has voted with Trump “99% of the time” and that the president had previously called him a friend in the race.

Financial Disparity and Political Risk

Despite the endorsement, Paxton has been significantly outspent. According to the ad-tracking firm AdImpact, Cornyn’s campaign and allied super PACs have spent more than $87 million on advertising since last year—including over $18.5 million since the March 3 primary—the majority of which focused on attacking Paxton. In contrast, Paxton’s campaign and a single super PAC have spent a total of $9.2 million, with $4.9 million spent since the March 3 primary.

Financial Disparity and Political Risk
Texas Senator Tim Scott

Republican leadership has expressed concern that a Paxton nomination could jeopardize the seat in November. Senator Tim Scott, chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, warned that it is a “strong possibility we cannot hold Texas” without Cornyn. Senator Cynthia Lummis expressed sadness over the decision, suggesting that a Paxton victory would make the general election more expensive for the party.

A Broader Pattern of Influence

The Texas endorsement is part of a wider effort by Trump to remove GOP members who have opposed him. Recent examples include:

Trump endorses Ken Paxton in Texas GOP Senate runoff
  • Indiana: Trump’s support helped remove five of seven Republican state senators in a May 5 primary after they opposed a White House-backed redistricting plan.
  • Louisiana: Senator Bill Cassidy finished third in his primary, falling out of the June 27 runoff. The Trump-endorsed U.S. Rep. Julia Letlow finished first.
  • Kentucky: Trump endorsed Ed Gallrein to challenge U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie, citing Massie’s opposition to the Iran war and push to release the Epstein files.

Looking Toward November

The winner of the runoff will face Democratic state Rep. James Talarico in the general election. Cornyn has argued that Paxton would be a “weak nominee who jeopardizes everything we care about.” Talarico, however, stated that the runoff winner is less important than the “billionaire megadonors and their corrupt political system” he intends to fight.

Paxton enters the final stretch of the race having been acquitted in a 2023 impeachment trial on corruption charges and reaching a deal in 2024 to resolve a securities fraud case.

What may happen next: With early voting continuing through Friday, Trump’s endorsement could potentially sway primary voters who prioritize loyalty to the MAGA movement over established legislative records. If Paxton wins the runoff, the GOP may be forced to divert significant financial resources to defend the Texas seat in November, which could potentially impact the party’s ability to fund other competitive Senate races across the country.

May 19, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • Reda Kateb: Remembering the Wealth of the Immigrant Experience

    June 24, 2026
  • U18 Girls Shine in Respectable Performance Against China

    June 24, 2026
  • Formula E Unveils Faster Cars and Iconic Tracks for New Season

    June 24, 2026
  • Hawaii Guard and Indonesia Celebrate 20 Years of State Partnership

    June 24, 2026
  • What Middle Powers Can Learn from Iran’s Strategic Playbook

    June 24, 2026

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Maya Jama flaunts her taut midriff in a white crop top and denim jeans during holiday as she shares New York pub crawl story

    April 5, 2025
  • 2

    Saar-Unternehmen hoffen auf tiefgreifende Reformen

    March 26, 2025
  • 3

    Marta Daddato: vita e racconti tra YouTube e podcast

    April 7, 2025
  • 4

    Unlocking Success: Why the FPÖ Could Outperform Projections and Transform Austria’s Political Landscape

    April 26, 2025
  • 5

    Mecimapro Apologizes for DAY6 Concert Chaos: Understanding the Controversy

    May 6, 2025

Follow Me

Follow Me
  • Cookie Policy
  • CORRECTIONS POLICY
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF SERVICE

Hosted by Byohosting – Most Recommended Web Hosting – for complains, abuse, advertising contact: o f f i c e @byohosting.com


Back To Top
Newsy Today
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World