And why does each agency calculate the area of u200bu200bprotected lands in its reports in its own way, getting different numbers, even if we still have lands in one layer (except for some abandoned mining areas)?
But the scariest thing is that in Estonia it is currently unknown how much forest has been lost and is being lost due to nature restoration. How much of the productive forest, which has grown thanks to the hard work of foresters over the centuries, has been cut down or is planned to be cut down to restore grassland communities? How many fully viable trees must die before large numbers of wetland restoration can be reported?
If you don’t even know the areas covered by nature protection, you shouldn’t even dream of carrying out impact assessments of protection measures.
Comment Read comments (1)
2024-01-25 22:00:00
mari-kartau-how-many-more-forests-will-have-to-die-for-the-sake-of-nature-conservation